|
I got a message to come back and play, so i'll start with this one. sign me up!
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2015 14:26 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 08:21 |
|
Starting to get some people i recognize! cant wait to be super scummy and get lynched!
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2015 22:46 |
|
Five posted:Pretty sure by definition all of us are going to be a little rusty. Confirming that I have my PM and that I was also never good.
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2015 21:39 |
|
schwein11 posted:Ecco said not to confirm, fyi. Whoops. We'll just pretend I like to be extra thorough and not that I didnt see that. See, not very good.
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2015 21:52 |
|
Five posted:Good morning, Thread. Morning! (Depending on time zone)
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2015 17:29 |
|
Catching up after being busy all day!Samfucius posted:Five's getting reaaaaal chummy here. Was this a serious vote?
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 01:34 |
|
Kleedrac posted:Wow, I didn't realize I was voting for LUTR. I will tell you a few things; I dont like this post, I dont think your vote was suspicious, but I think the response to pressure kind of is I also dont like the back handed vorbis comment, are you saying you think Vorbis is scum?
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 01:40 |
|
Kleedrac posted:
Kleedrac posted:
Okay so you dont think hes scum but then what was the comment for? look at vorbis instead of me? do you think the act is scummy but he isnt? (Ps, feel better!)
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 11:55 |
|
schwein11 posted:Not going to vote for Kleedrac at this point - I don't see it guys. I was originally leaning kleedrac, but the more he posts im not sure. Im not totally convinced of his innocence or scummitude yet, would vote though.
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 19:51 |
|
schwein11 posted:What the Christ is this? The way I read it is: (1) you originally thought a dude was sort of scummy ('leaning"); (2) then you weren't as sure (backing off the weak "leaning" to some degree), (3) you don't have a strong conviction of whether he's town or scum now; but (4) you'd vote for him? I originally thought he was shady but the more he explains himself the more I can see why he is posting the way he is. I know how it is to get lynched over and over D1. I have other opinions definately, I was only trying to say I would vote him to avoid a no-lynch.
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2015 01:22 |
|
Samfucius posted:Uradd why the hell aren't you voting? Im here for the deadline, Im not 100% sold on klee tbh but hes the only viable option right now it looks like so ##vote: kleedrac putting that there and im going to read everything again
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2015 03:33 |
|
Kleedrac posted:I'm curious about this as well as I'm not sure how many there should be. blah, what is this? this may as well be a claim but youve said nothing since? just you shouldnt lynch me I have powers? schwein11 posted:"only viable option"? looking back on chaos... votes on klee, chaoslord posted:I'm leaving my vote on Kleedrac. The flailing doesn't tell me anything. People flail as scum and as town. that looks not the best to me, but he doesnt have much to go from.
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2015 03:39 |
|
ConorT posted:Yeaaaah I'm good with uradd ##vote uradd what is this vote? just +1ing?
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2015 03:43 |
|
ConorT posted:Agreed about five (most active) and Schwerin, not so much uradd; he's just sorta prodded kleedrac a bit and nothing else. Giving him a pass for now since its a truncated d1. Kleedrac feels town, not sure why you've got never girls pegged at scum after only 2 posts. I think this is the only other mention of me and its just an ehhhh~ and he drops in just to vote with no explaining?
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2015 03:46 |
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:I was going to quote all the scummy uradd posts but it's literally all of them. Jumps on kleedrac when it's obvious it's klee or himself. All other posts are wishywashy. I was suspicious of klee as soon as he posted his list points? how was it when it was obvious it was him or me?
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2015 03:39 |
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:You prevented me from doing something but it wasn't a hit and I'm not scum. "you prevented me from doing something, and its very convenient that there was no kill" ##vote Nevergirls
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2015 03:41 |
|
Five posted:He's claiming that Chaoslord is lying, therefore Conor blocked Nevergirls, therefore nevergirls is scum because no night kill. I thought chaos said he blocked schweine, id try to add that post but im on my phone
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2015 15:15 |
|
LordVorbis posted:In fact, how does this vote make sense? Like, it's literally either ConorT or chaoslord. You're going to get nowhere with a Nevergirls vote right now. I know this wasnt at me, but I still dont like the semi-action claim from never, why should this go nowhere, never pretty much claimed but didnt say what, and a kill got stopped.
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2015 15:18 |
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:Is this you trying to ID who blocked you from your night kill? Very combative here, NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:You were "suspicious" and backpedaled like 2 posts later. You only cast your vote when it was like, 4 on him and 3 on you (I think?) to bring him to -1. Responds to me but nothing to do with my vote drop on him? NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:I would be intrigued. "Intrigued" about connor lying but doesnt post once the shoe drops. he did say he was blocked. Ima go with conor is full of poo poo and they are both scum
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2015 15:26 |
|
LordVorbis posted:Because we have counter-claiming jailers. There is no way both are town, so ONE of them is scum. Therefore we should lynch one of them. Trying to jump off and start on a third is super loving scummy. If im choosing a jailer to vote ill be voting conort. I think never should be the following lynch, however. In a 3 scum team those are my 2 picks.
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2015 16:00 |
|
Samfucius posted:Life = viva (latin), new = nova, foundation = something a mason would build or an organization so it works two ways Oof, I never would have gotten that. schwein11 posted:Why full claim now? Because I was giving him poo poo about the quality of his claim, as he quoted in that post. ##unvote
|
# ¿ Apr 2, 2015 00:29 |
|
Five posted:Right now it has to be Conor or Chaoslord. After that its you or Schwein this is pretty much it, and im way more confident in chaoslord than conor. ##vote ConorT
|
# ¿ Apr 2, 2015 00:34 |
|
schwein11 posted:So I guess I better claim - I'm the cop. Was blocked both nights. Check out first letter of my posts at beginning of game for those who care about breadcrumby things. I targeted Conor night one and Nevergirls night two. Gunsmith vs Cop this time around, claimsville again.
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2015 14:35 |
|
VivaNova posted:I believe that cl would have jailed Schwein. I believe that as well, can you perform a kill on the jailer if he jails you?
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2015 16:35 |
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:Can you answer my question please Id like to know what you think I did, personally. since scum opened the last day with silliness and im not entirely sure there would even be a gunsmith in this game, especially with a cop claim.
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2015 21:37 |
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:we have a jailer I only have one item, and its definately not a gun ##vote Nevergirls
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2015 05:44 |
|
LordVorbis posted:Okay, what is it? I have a skeleton key, it allows me to check to see if someone has moved at night.
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2015 20:09 |
|
LordVorbis posted:Okay, what have you done with it? This isn't the time to be coy. Night 1 I checked on Schweine, and he hadnt. Last night I checked Never and they had moved.
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2015 21:59 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 08:21 |
|
EccoRaven posted:NOTES: My pm specifically says I go through doc kills with no doc? so I had no power? this seemed a little skewed. specially because of the traitor.
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2015 12:05 |