|
hullo
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2015 16:05
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 22:01 |
|
|
CONFIRMED, HEY GUYS I'M VANILLA TOWN WHY DID I JUST POST THAT, AAAAWWWWW 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2015 02:57
|
|
|
ANarc is still pretty new and play in a really self-conscious and defensive way, even as town, and that looks scummy~
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2015 23:51
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:presuming you think Narc is town then. I don't have an alignment read on either of them.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 12:20
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Or you guys could be a scum team Scum wouldn't claim confirmed masons d1, c'mon.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 12:20
|
|
|
it's a scumclaim ##vote punt
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 15:16
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:Oh look some more posts, including two votes that I completely disagree with. Deflecting from "come on, a confirmed mason claim isn't a good place to start looking for scum" with "what is even the nature of scumminess, or existence, or anything" is awkward af. It's a good vote.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 15:55
|
|
|
It's a euphemism for lynch.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 16:14
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:Yeah I don't get that at all. You said "I don't think scum would claim confirmed masons D1," Punt said "that's not necessarily true, people don't follow a set pattern of behavior," so your natural response was to go "welp you disagreed with me, scum ##vote". It's not a good vote. nah
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 16:41
|
|
|
you think "two scum running a claimed masons gambit" is likelier than literally anybody else being scum?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 17:40
|
|
|
biased how? he listed three scum picks: the two claimed masons, and punt. that means he thinks the two claimed masons are likelier to be scum than anybody who isn't on that list. that's not a reasonable opinion.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Wow I was totally joking about the masons being scum, I didn't think it was gonna turn into a whole big thing. I can't give any reads now but I'll be back in a few hours and will do a reread of the thread. in the last two games we played together -we dunked a scum day one -i identified 3/4 scum based on d1 alone free your mind from day one negativity
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
##vote lutr
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 20:04
|
|
|
oh okay ##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 20:15
|
|
|
i'm going to a party so um ##vote doug i guess i have no alignment opinion on him.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 22:19
|
|
|
Look Under The Rock posted:Nice distance Thanks!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 22:43
|
|
|
hi what does searching do and how bad did i miss out by not searching
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 22:17
|
|
|
##vote theram
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 22:32
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Also Diq "This post is very calculated" was the crux of the case you led on a dead townie yesterday so maybe don't go tooting your horn just yet Are you saying Diq is scum? Or that he was wrong once and therefore (??)?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 22:35
|
|
|
TheRam posted:fyi, we had 1 NK. loving columbo over here
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 22:36
|
|
|
Ram is exhibiting bizarre mirror universe logic that doesn't add up i'm happy with my vote bye
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 22:38
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I mean he's acting like he caught Ram red handed on the same fact that he was just wrong about yesterday Those are two independent events that aren't related to one another though. You're saying he was wrong before so he's wrong again which makes no sense.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 22:41
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Well now that I get what you're saying I do, but I find I find it hard to believe Ram is that stupid What's the precise amount of stupid you think Ram is? Because the explanation that has him genuinely believe that Diq is scum based on the case he presented depends on him being pretty loving stupid.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 22:43
|
|
|
TheRam posted:Alright, so GoT leaked and that has made it very hard to do anything other than stay up and get pumped. Let me just recap, maybe not everything I'm thinking but I'm trying to make a post where I spell this poo poo out:
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
i could switch to exakt
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
your reaction to gulag is artificial af instead of saying "no that's not true", and moving on, you're dragging on the performative "why are people lyingggggggggggggggggg?" without applying any thought or adding anything new to it. you're happy to just adopt that stance (someone is lying, it's not me, and i'll keep reminding people of it) instead of engaging literally anything else about the game.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 02:42
|
|
|
Puntification posted:Hey guys sorry for missing the deadline last night, I can't tell the time apparently. what does claiming get you here
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 13:04
|
|
|
oh i didn't recognise that post 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 13:22
|
|
|
your case against me is fine on its own. why drape yourself in the habits of a dead player to make it?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 15:26
|
|
|
"instead of"?  i've already said why i think theram is scum. his story doesn't hold up. there's no reasonable thought process behind it. "i jailed diq, and there was a nightkill, therefore diq has a nightkill" is balls out ridiculous.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 15:49
|
|
|
Poque posted:that's not what he said at all. he said he expected two nightkills and that his "findings led [him] to believe [he] prevented a 2nd NK" that's exactly what he said. his findings are "I jailed diq".
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 15:57
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:on the other hand this is a crazy post that makes no sense either and you're ignoring it, pmom. why?  you can also ask literally anybody in the thread that same question
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 16:07
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:i'm asking it to you because you're currently voting theram for a similarly bad line of logic mostly it happened while i was jumping on the ram and i didn't pursue it
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 16:12
|
|
|
and also the ram keeps doing this and drawing attention to his moon anti-logic
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 16:13
|
|
|
oh, right, the easiest explanation is that Somber was shot twice isn't it
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 17:09
|
|
|
why would a juggernaut waste their kill on somber though
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 17:14
|
|
|
i think Ram might have been convinced there's be a second nk because he's scum and someone on his team is either BP or a doctor
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 17:16
|
|
|
if you have a limited number of uses of a juggernaut kill, you're going to waste a use on a claimed mason?GulagDolls posted:do you think he, as scum, would just let that slip without thinking in his first post do i think he, as scum, would do it? sure. he's not the very picture of clear-eyed rationality.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 17:18
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Well, it turned out to be a good scum move since they got two town for the price of one. the decision to use a juggernaut on somber would have had to be before scum knew he was a lover. i don't think using a juggernaut makes sense without knowing that he was lovers.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 17:25
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 22:01 |
|
|
Poque posted:If I were in a masonry and was getting heat and my unconfirmed partner did that, I would react the exakt same way. exakt says they're not in a masonry at all
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 18:45
|
|