|
HiipFire posted:im sorry for liking F U N What do you think of the case on Uradd? Anyone you're suspicious of at this point?
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 09:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 19:06 |
|
|
Is Keane usually this question-y. I feel like the socratic method is a departure from the norm for him.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 15:41
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:Is Keane usually this question-y. I feel like the socratic method is a departure from the norm for him. Yes of course! (I am in multiple games so I'm a bit more subdued here while trying g to finish up)
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 15:55
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:Is Keane usually this question-y. I feel like the socratic method is a departure from the norm for him. He's been pretty much this way in all his games lately. It's quite a change from the Keane who would beatbox and then leave the thread for days, but he's also been super townie in my opinion.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 17:00
|
|
|
Super townie seems like an overstatement, but the questions he is asking is sending the thread in the right direction, it is just not what I am used to.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 17:55
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:He's been pretty much this way in all his games lately. It's quite a change from the Keane who would beatbox and then leave the thread for days, but he's also been super townie in my opinion. So I take it you felt differently from grandicap's stance about questions that point the thread in the right way about Pander's questions? I also didn't know what he was expecting me to say about his vote.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 18:30
|
|
|
KhyrosFinalCut posted:So I take it you felt differently from grandicap's stance about questions that point the thread in the right way about Pander's questions? I also didn't know what he was expecting me to say about his vote. I'm not 100% clear what you are saying here my friend.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:35
|
|
|
Uradd has been replaced by Samfucius, say hello.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 22:11
|
|
|
Hey Grandicap, how serious was your vote on Uradd?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 22:28
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:I'm not 100% clear what you are saying here my friend. Sorry, I was conflating you and grandi there a little bit. You've ventured a concrete opinion on CCkeane being towny -- he's asked a significant chunk of questions. Can you tell me more about your thoughts about Pander and his line of questioning?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 23:17
|
|
|
I know it's, like, the weekend, or whatever, but I am severely disappointed with the Rate of Posting (RoP). Let's get this poo poo rolling. My vote on Uradd's surrogate remains: ##Vote Samfucius Samfucius, I would recommend posting any reads you have to help rectify this situation. Hiipfire, I am still waiting on a response.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 23:36
|
|
|
Samfucius posted:Hey Grandicap, how serious was your vote on Uradd? "How serious was your vote on [me]" is not how I expect town to enter the game, especially given the vote he's asking about. Grandicap's reason for voting clearly was "you don't think my kid is cute", which is obviously a joke. Why is his first instinct to question people who have voted him, rather than talk about who he finds townie or scummy?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 23:41
|
|
|
I was wondering if he had any underlying suspicions, that's all. Also there aren't a lot of reads to be had at the moment, but you're being awfully prescriptive about how we should play this game. I lean town on Keane and you, despite the fact you are firing all my "screw you, dad" circuits
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 23:48
|
|
|
Samfucius posted:I was wondering if he had any underlying suspicions, that's all. Thanks. No scum reads yet, then?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 23:50
|
|
|
Honestly, no.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 23:51
|
|
|
KhyrosFinalCut posted:Can you tell me more about your thoughts about Pander and his line of questioning? I was a little put off by Pander's early questioning because it felt like the sort of thing that wasn't going to lead anywhere, more like an empty question that was designed to throw some suspicion around and kind of "letting the content come to him" so he could pick it apart later. I don't know if I am explaining that all too well. It didn't sit well with me. Since then he's been ok, I probably feel neutral on him at this point.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 23:57
|
|
|
Uranium Phoenix posted:I know it's, like, the weekend, or whatever, but I am severely disappointed with the Rate of Posting (RoP). Let's get this poo poo rolling. I think UP is scum. I think he's using this replacement for a super weak vote to ride. He's been acting super "Townie" and helpful, pushing people to post reads. I don't like it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
LordVorbis posted:I think UP is scum. I think he's using this replacement for a super weak vote to ride. He's been acting super "Townie" and helpful, pushing people to post reads. I don't like it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 00:46
|
|
|
Hello I am dead in all my other games (or the game recently ended.) Now this game has CCKEANE'S FULL ATTENTION.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
bowmore posted:I think UP is just being a jerk, you look bad for not voting him when you said he was scum imo I am, in fact, a jerk, but LV is indeed currently voting for me. LordVorbis posted:I think UP is scum. I think he's using this replacement for a super weak vote to ride. He's been acting super "Townie" and helpful, pushing people to post reads. I don't like it. Playing like town and pushing people to scumhunt is scummy. Got it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:20
|
|
|
Samfucius posted:Hey Grandicap, how serious was your vote on Uradd? This is a good post. For a scum to make. In the scum doc. ##vote: Samfucius
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:I was a little put off by Pander's early questioning because it felt like the sort of thing that wasn't going to lead anywhere, more like an empty question that was designed to throw some suspicion around and kind of "letting the content come to him" so he could pick it apart later. I don't know if I am explaining that all too well. It didn't sit well with me. Since then he's been ok, I probably feel neutral on him at this point. I've done stuff since then? News to me. In other really weird news I kinda agree with LordVorbis about UP. Uranium Phoenix posted:Going back, this is probably the best vote so far. It indicates Uradd is skimming (or not reading) the thread, which is a behavior more often seen with scum. bowmore posted:I think UP is just being a jerk, you look bad for not voting him when you said he was scum imo
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 04:08
|
|
|
Uranium Phoenix posted:I am, in fact, a jerk, but LV is indeed currently voting for me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 04:18
|
|
|
Pander posted:That bolded part says absolutely nothing. What's it there for except for presentation?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 04:25
|
|
|
Pander posted:
Pander's essentially seeing two instances of the exact same thing: People not paying close attention to the thread. In one instance, Hal, he makes a throwaway comment. One might guess this is because Hal is implying Pander is town. In the other instance, Bowmore, he's seeing a conspiracy to vote someone. Either he has his blinders on, or it's purposeful selectivity.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 04:29
|
|
|
Uranium Phoenix posted:Pander's essentially seeing two instances of the exact same thing: People not paying close attention to the thread. In one instance, Hal, he makes a throwaway comment. One might guess this is because Hal is implying Pander is town. In the other instance, Bowmore, he's seeing a conspiracy to vote someone. Either he has his blinders on, or it's purposeful selectivity. 2) How are you getting that he's implying I'm town from "neutral"? 3) Are you being aggressive for its own sake? Because this type of lovely casebuilding doesn't ring true. Uranium Phoenix posted:Okay, so then why are you focusing on the part that says nothing instead of the case? What do you think of the case on Uradd/Samfucius? UP posted:I'm watching several other people at this point, but this is the only thing I think is worth of a genuine vote. As far as Sam goes, his question to grandicap about his vote seems like an attempt to nudge grandicap to take it off should it be a jokevote. I don't know sam at all, so if he's new it could be simple paranoia about seeing three votes on him and wanting to whittle it down. I don't think scum are alone in having that motivation. I think he genuinely thinks Keane is town, although he might be buttering you up by calling you town given your pushing on him. URadd's posting was a lot worse. Uradd didn't seem to have a good handle on jokephase. His second-to-last post seemed to indicate he wanted to retroactively make his jokepost case on keane a legit case. This is reinforced as a self-defense in his very last post. I wouldn't vote Sam at the moment based on his own posting. Uradd's posting I would vote.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 05:02
|
|
|
bowmore posted:I would get on Keane for trying to drive content from nothing but I feel like that's me being sore that he voted me
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 05:03
|
|
|
Pander posted:1) I wasn't speaking well of Hal. I don't know why he'd go from being suspicious of me to "neutral", because other than a brief back and forth with KFC I've not really posted much this game
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 05:11
|
|
|
A whole bunch of people don't even have a jokevote down, never mind a real vote: Votecount for Day 1   Samfucius (2): Uranium Phoenix, CCKeane Grandicap (1): Rurea Quidnose (1): Uranium Phoenix, bowmore, LordVorbis (1): Quidnose KhyrosFinalCut (1): Pander Uranium Phoenix (1): bowmore, LordVorbis, bowmore (0): CCKeane, Pander (0): CCKeane, bowmore, CCKeane (0): Pander, Not Voting (6): fiery_valkyrie, Grandicap, Hal Incandenza, HiipFire, KhyrosFinalCut, SamfuciusWith 13 alive, it's 7 votes to lynch. The current deadline is April 13th, 2015 at 11 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 1 day, 23 hours.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 05:12
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:I was a little put off by Pander's early questioning because it felt like the sort of thing that wasn't going to lead anywhere, more like an empty question that was designed to throw some suspicion around and kind of "letting the content come to him" so he could pick it apart later. I don't know if I am explaining that all too well. It didn't sit well with me. Since then he's been ok, I probably feel neutral on him at this point. Pander posted:I've done stuff since then? I Agree with UP, above, I liked the rest of Hal's post, but the bold is a problem for me. -- But what I really don't get is how it isn't a bigger problem for you, Pander. I'm seriously confused -- What even is this? You know you haven't made a single post since clarifying/reiterating that you wanted to know what I thought of your vote. Why are you letting the bolded BS slide so easily? There hasn't been any meaningful "since then" to be okay with. How are you not hitting this harder?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
Samfucius posted:Hey Grandicap, how serious was your vote on Uradd? I'm going to quote this again because I fear it'll get lost in the fold. BUT I WON'T LET IT DANG NABBIT.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 05:19
|
|
|
KhyrosFinalCut posted:I Agree with UP, above, Why are you going after me about it instead of confronting Hal directly, since you seem to think it's more of a scumtell than I do?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 05:20
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I'm going to quote this again because I fear it'll get lost in the fold. BUT I WON'T LET IT DANG NABBIT. Are you quoting because you too want an answer to it, or because you wish to showcase it's scumminess. Because I am behind option #2.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 06:16
|
|
|
I would be happy voting KFC and Sam\Uradd at this point. Someone remind me to put together a KFC case tomorrow when I wake up please. I have a seed of it in my brain, but 1am is not the time to put it together.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 06:18
|
|
|
Pander posted:I was thinking to myself about it. I noticed the neutral thing when I was replying to UP and mulled it over a bit. Hard to really say it's an impossible thing. I've posted so little this game that it's NOT unreasonable to be 'neutral' about me, if 'neutral' means 'there isn't enough information to form a strong opinion about this person right now.' It doesn't have to be BS. It CAN be, but it doesn't have to be. It's too early for low posting volume to be a sign of lurking scum, so neutrality is a realistic attitude toward someone in lieu of 'town' or 'scum'. quote:Why are you going after me about it instead of confronting Hal directly, since you seem to think it's more of a scumtell than I do? Because - I liked every other thing Hal said in that post - I think it's possible he was confused - Your tossoff reaction to it is striking me as more scummy than his comment is striking me as scummy. You don't say something like "you're confused/have me mistaken for someone else". You just sarcastically threw shade but there's no teeth. Then like UP says, it's not because you don't pay attention when people aren't reading the thread. Uradd/sam is still better, I think.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 16:30
|
|
|
Uranium Phoenix posted:Apology accepted. I have been kinda half reading this game cause I've been busy with other mafia games finishing up ill try to get poo poo done tonight
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 16:49
|
|
|
bowmore posted:I think UP is just being a jerk, you look bad for not voting him when you said he was scum imo Already am voting him. Defending your scum buddy? Uranium Phoenix posted:I am, in fact, a jerk, but LV is indeed currently voting for me. Its more how you've got like a ton of "what are your opinion posts" it makes me suspicious.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 18:04
|
|
|
LordVorbis posted:Its more how you've got like a ton of "what are your opinion posts" it makes me suspicious.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 18:11
|
|
|
Pander posted:I've done stuff since then? Haha I guess you hadn't really anything said else, I honestly didn't look back when I was posting that I just remembered being suspicious of what you had said and then not feeling quite as bad after we had our little exchange where you schoolmarmed me and that I hadn't seen anything from you that pinged me since then (which it turns out is because you hadn't actually said anything). How embarrassing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 18:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 19:06 |
|
|
Uranium Phoenix posted:This game has been going on for 65 hours and we are up to 6 pages, a lot of which is signups and jokes. Why is prodding people to post and move the game out of jokephase "suspicious"? Game has been mostly on the weekend. I hope it will pick up during the weekend.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 19:13
|
|