|
oh poo poo this has started why didn't you explicitly tell me and me personally
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 08:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 01:43 |
|
|
Birdstrike posted:I would like to post more but my in laws are coming over and they don't understand the concept of something awful dot com. "i'm pretending be a beautiful cartoon man with other people and we have to hunt down the really beautiful cartoon man and wait where are you going"
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
i'm just kidding of course speedwagon isn't a bad guy
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
wow rude
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 06:37
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Seagull was a random pick but he replied very quickly after I mentioned him. So he stays on my watch list. also rude
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 08:26
|
|
|
ugh phone posting
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 08:27
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I dunno "Pro Anidav" sounds fun. Like Pro Golf sickeningly harsh burn on golfers there
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 09:15
|
|
|
##vote me own self
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 09:39
|
|
|
my takes: omgus beet gaspy and gwyn are talking weird??? i'm a shitposter anidav toml is a walking disease bag  other people
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 10:15
|
|
|
most compelling of all this evidence for me though isSeagull posted:anidav
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 10:15
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:What do you mean by this? I'm omgusing Birdstrike? Where did Birdstrike vote me? (i'm saying you suck  )
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 10:43
|
|
|
no idea who to vote for i'm presuming though we should probably pick someone to get rid of soon i mean anime david is right there
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 11:46
|
|
|
Of the three who have a vote so far I'm leaning closest to Mith I guess but still not really???? I might have to disappear soon though so pre-emptive ##vote Mithranderp
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 11:48
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:i dont want to really vote mith well i could split it further ultimately it comes down to do we want to have a lynch day one or not and uh i'm pretty sure we want to since it's all town's got you're one to usually go with this line
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2015 11:50
|
|
|
If we're going to take the Mith flip as a foregone conclusion at this point, do we want to look at who voted against a lynch yesterday? Obviously Mith is one, but we also have TOML (no show), Gwyn and Gaspy (beet) and Birdstrike (TOML alongside Mith). Obviously this is subject to what Mith ends up flipping as and if she's town it doesn't mean any of these folks are good but at the current time I'd put Gaspy / Gwyn at the top followed by TOML and then Birdstrike.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:I would be interested in hearing whether Gaspy is still at the top of Seagull's list. Hey sorry long night at work. I'm kind of suss on beet now but gaspy gunned for him day one and changed votes around come day two to vote with him for Mith. My inclination right now is that if gaspy's scum beet isn't and if beet's scum gaspy isn't. I think you also asked about Gwyn so I still think he might be involved with gaspy somehow or maybe they're just making dumb jokes as brothers. Shrug.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 04:30
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Lynching one of us doesn't necessarily incriminate OR vindicate the other. that's true but you've both been going hard at each other which leaves the possibility of two dumb townies or one scum. i guess you could be two dumb scum personally i'm leaning towards gaspy being scum over you though
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:No I'm just saying it's bad logic to assume flipping one gives you any information about the other one. Kinda mafia 101. Who votes who and how they flip is a way you can determine who has what allegiances, you just have to examine how the votes fall. On that subject though we need numbers to find out anything off of this and I doubt Gwyn's going to vote gaspy either out of trusting his brother or being aligned with him so ##vote Asphyxious
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 05:20
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:Gaspy has character claimed. He wants other people to character claim, because he believes that he can win by solving the flavour. He might be right or wrong about that. But what his posts suggest is that he isn't scum, because if he was scum it wouldn't actually matter to him who had what character because his own being scum would invalidate his flavour theory. Birdstrike posted:##vote Matthew Beet you fools! here's the rub: beet claimed Jonathan and no one has called him out on it.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 05:26
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:I am. Jojo is scum! so far all good guys have been town?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 05:29
|
|
|
like i guess straits is also a good guy (say straits) ((straizo is dumb))
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 05:30
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:The correlation doesn't proooove anythiiiing here's the problem then: both jonathan and straits are good guys but being good guys doesn't matter soooooo
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 05:35
|
|
|
My biggest problem with birdstrike's theory is that for all of the good characters to be scum Jonathan makes the least sense AND Straits makes the most sense. Maybe I'm getting played and actually the ultimate good guy paladin is the truly bad one dio did nothing wrong
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 05:42
|
|
|
(for those playing along at home straits becomes a bad guy eventually, though not now )
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 05:44
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:I have saved this information in the hopes that I would be able to sway the thread with my reasoning and in the hopes that I would survive one more night. if you're going to claim your role like this, who are you?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 05:54
|
|
|
I'm actually starting to lean more toward beet now. For me it's now a toss up between him and birdstrike (he might be lying after all)
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 07:00
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:honestly if birdstrike is scum and is lying about being the cop he is pretty lucky that there's no town cop yeah this is the main thing that's making me reconsider things because it would be pretty easy for the "real" cop to cut it down if he weren't it but unless someone's suddenly going to pop up and go "ACTUALLY I'M A COP" it seems like he might be telling the truth
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 07:04
|
|
|
and if someone did claim cop now it would look extremely suss so
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 07:05
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I don't think that's necessarily the case. It'd be a poo poo time to throw it down if so, and neither TOML Gwyn nor I have claimed it so... I think he's telling the truth. Hammer time?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 07:10
|
|
|
Here we go!!! ##unvote ##vote Matthew Beet
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 07:12
|
|
|
 You all thought I was Speedwagon, but 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 09:54
|
|
|
Legitimately no idea. Occasional insanity? He saw me visiting you night two?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 09:58
|
|
|
I was explicitly aiming for people who were generally unnoticed for the nightkills, which I was worried could have Gwyn or I picked out as "why not them" but no one suspected a thing. Pretty sure I pointed at Gwyn the most out of anyone.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 10:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 01:43 |
|
|
Here's the scum doc if people want to see us laugh at you: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cMcFRLRt8EWnTA-7yZtLx20YCea38fpY4hVliJ6e_TE/edit#gid=1207631696
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2015 11:22
|
|