|
lol @ how much goons loving love netflix mmm i sure hope this one marginally more competent publicly traded media corporation completely loving locks down this market that's currently split amongst five or six marginally less competent publicly traded media corporations i'm sure they won't abuse their resulting monopoly power you really think a corporation would do that? just give their customers a raw deal to increase their profits? the free market would never stand for this also they are loving poo poo to work for and run by lovely people but that should go without saying (senior management loves stack ranking over there something something game of thrones)
|
# ? Apr 24, 2015 15:42 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 15:36 |
|
btw corporations are amoral actors and as such corporate officers have absolutely no standing to make any appeals to morality the moral aspects of copyright are somewhat nuanced but that should be a subject for private individuals to make a decision on.
|
# ? Apr 24, 2015 15:46 |
|
wrong, corporations are people and they want to be our friends
|
# ? Apr 24, 2015 16:01 |
|
i'm not concerned about the very poor
|
# ? Apr 24, 2015 16:13 |
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:but i do remember the rise and fall of the bit torrent barnyard this is why i originally signed up for sa
|
# ? Apr 24, 2015 16:23 |
|
Visual GNUdio posted:lol if you didn't join SA for the filez
|
# ? Apr 24, 2015 16:28 |
|
i joined for the cliff yablonski
|
# ? Apr 24, 2015 16:59 |
|
i remember getting a submitted map reviewed on cranky steve but i forget which one i think it had been on planetquake at the time tho
|
# ? Apr 24, 2015 17:26 |
|
i didnt know bittorrent barnyard was a thing that existed until last year
|
# ? Apr 24, 2015 17:32 |
|
PuTTY riot posted:much like your posting
|
# ? Apr 24, 2015 17:34 |
|
lol if you didn't sign up to get dangum ronpa lets plays
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 08:51 |
|
lol if u didn't sign up to post funny computer
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 17:18 |
|
wolffenstein posted:im surprised bittorrent sync hasn't taken over regular bittorrent because it practically eliminates nearly all the problems of bt (trackers, lack of encryption, ratios, rss feed for new content, etc.) don't you kinda still need a tracker because dht can't do everything? still though bitorrent sync does seem cool in terms of possible applications
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 18:53 |
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:a "scene release" means it's the official album but on the tracker prior to official release. scene releases can and often are made from copies of legit media purchased at retail. or like, games that were purchased legit and cracked also thanks to whoever linked that new yuorker article, it was a good read
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 19:10 |
|
DuckConference posted:don't you kinda still need a tracker because dht can't do everything?
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 20:00 |
|
i dont understand how something can provide anonymous p2p without a central network somewhere
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 20:22 |
|
scratch that i dont understand how anonymous p2p can work at all
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 20:26 |
|
jony ive aces posted:lol if u didn't sign up to post funny computer computer werent funny back then. they were cool and serious and had a very real possibility of causing trinity to show up at your door to score some warez. i signed up to be leet liek jeffk. but this was a rereg for
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 20:27 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:i dont understand how something can provide anonymous p2p without a central network somewhere something something blockchain
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 20:28 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:scratch that i dont understand how anonymous p2p can work at all it doesnt
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 21:22 |
|
i'm always really happy to discover that something isn't confusing because i'm too dumb to understand it (the assumed case), but because it actually just doesn't make any sense
|
# ? Apr 25, 2015 21:33 |
|
i don't think it's anonymous, obviously you can just see what ip you're sending/receiving blocks to/from but it removes the need for a central tracker I guess, all you need is the key for a set of files and you can access them once you can find a node via DHT that has them
|
# ? Apr 26, 2015 02:33 |
|
well there's freenet, where you know what IPs you're sending and receiving from but you don't know always what data you're getting. but the secure mode requires that you like manually exchange keys with people you trust irl I've never used it though, for the obvious reason
|
# ? Apr 28, 2015 16:30 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:i'm always really happy to discover that something isn't confusing because i'm too dumb to understand it (the assumed case), but because it actually just doesn't make any sense sorry, it does actually work. Hope the helps with ur confusion! e: p2p and anonymous p2p. i dont know anything about bitsync.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2015 21:46 |
|
where da moviez at lowtax https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9BhQOTYTIc
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 00:13 |
|
show me the files richard
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 00:15 |
|
ultramiraculous posted:where da moviez at lowtax mmm hm
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 00:39 |
|
ultramiraculous posted:where da moviez at lowtax welcome to page 4 :img-timeline:
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 00:51 |
|
emoji posted:mmm hm Nice joke that's a wordpress blog!!
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 03:47 |
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:well there's freenet, where you know what IPs you're sending and receiving from but you don't know always what data you're getting. but the secure mode requires that you like manually exchange keys with people you trust irl I got 95% of the way i to configuring a freenet node before I thought about what things people would probably transmit over it. good thinking 16yo me
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 04:58 |
|
theflyingexecutive posted:I got 95% of the way i to configuring a freenet node before I thought about what things people would probably transmit over it. good thinking 16yo me Yeah, like I'm going to run a service on my computer with this in the faq... quote:Q: I don't want my node to be used to harbor child porn, offensive content or terrorism. What can I do?
|
# ? Apr 30, 2015 13:46 |
|
akadajet posted:Yeah, like I'm going to run a service on my computer with this in the faq... lmao
|
# ? Apr 30, 2015 13:49 |
|
akadajet posted:Yeah, like I'm going to run a service on my computer with this in the faq... jfc
|
# ? Apr 30, 2015 13:54 |
|
|
# ? Apr 30, 2015 16:31 |
|
freedoms are a slippery slope if we remove the freedom to exploit children, whats next, censorship of peace protests!! gently caress anyone who defends freenet's ideals, though
|
# ? Apr 30, 2015 17:50 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:scratch that i dont understand how anonymous p2p can work at all #mathishard
|
# ? Apr 30, 2015 17:57 |
|
akadajet posted:Yeah, like I'm going to run a service on my computer with this in the faq...
|
# ? Apr 30, 2015 18:15 |
|
text editor posted:freedoms are a slippery slope if we remove the freedom to exploit children, whats next, censorship of peace protests!! it really would be cool if somebody could design a freenet that excludes the icky stuff though like hell yea i wanna help people with oppressive governments get news about the outside world. but nope you can't do that unless you're cool with allowing historical records on your machine of one of the worst crimes imaginable
|
# ? May 1, 2015 06:04 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:i dont understand how something can provide anonymous p2p without a central network somewhere it's not foolproof (all the preset ones for a particular client could be taken down) but it's better than nothing vv also i could be completely wrong about this but idk
|
# ? May 1, 2015 07:07 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 15:36 |
|
yeah the problem is you have to have that first central node to get into the larger network and if you can discover it, so can anyone else which makes it vulnerable to attack. even if you are already on the network and have saved previous peers, if none of them are available the next time you get on then you have to go back to the central node to get back in. my guess would be in normal bt operation the regular old tracker provides dht information so clients can continue without the tracker if it goes down or maybe as a mechanism to offload requests. its more of a redundancy thing than a privacy thing
|
# ? May 1, 2015 14:55 |