|
I think I gave us a lot more stuff to work with because I tried to get MysticalMachineGun lynched last night, we can look at that today
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 12:06 |
|
|
Wow scum rush out of the door on me. I'm gonna sit here and laugh at this latest tactic.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:32
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Wow scum rush out of the door on me. I'm gonna sit here and laugh at this latest tactic. Honestly Beet you're at the top of my list so if you could put forward an alternative theory I'd appreciate it.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:32
|
|
|
Mithranderp posted:Anyway, I'm not gonna change my vote. I think coq is scum. Lynch him, if he flips town, lynch me. Voila.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:33
|
|
|
there were quite a few people trying to move the vote onto me when the COQ lynch was gaining momentum
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
bowmore posted:Also I was totally right about MysticalMachineGun, he wasn't town. He was avoiding poo poo on purpose. but I was still right about MysticalMachineGun not being town
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
bowmore posted:this post urks me a bit me too. look, we must be pretty close to lylo, so i'm just going to flat out ask mith to roleclaim and explain her night actions thus far. until i called mith on D2, she had been laying really low, and she seemed to do just enough work to throw off suspicion and then went right back to laying low again So, Mith, what's your role and what have been your night actions so far? also, let's not lose sight of the fact that beet hammered coq - i'm not too sure what to make of this yet.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
bowmore posted:I think I gave us a lot more stuff to work with because I tried to get MysticalMachineGun lynched last night, we can look at that today Yeah an interesting way to frame it. See I saw you trying very hard to lead us off a scum lynch. Funny.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
everythingWasBees posted:if SKYCOQ is scum that could indicate beet is scum and if not well we don't really have any good leads other than gaspy may be telling the truth or may be lying "I need a good reason to bus SKYCOQ, uhhhhh, well I can vote him on the reasoning that Beet is scum, that makes sense right???"
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
 COWARDLY SCUM TEAM! YOU WERE NO MATCH FOR THE MIGHTY ASPHYXIOUS!
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Yeah an interesting way to frame it. See I saw you trying very hard to lead us off a scum lynch.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
yeah if I was scum there is no way i'd hammer SKY COQ because it'd be lylo today
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:also, let's not lose sight of the fact that beet hammered coq - i'm not too sure what to make of this yet.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
bowmore posted:this post nah, it was more me wondering who would be worth voting for. 'cause if you learn that someone is scum but it doesn't suggest anything else, then you have on scum down but you don't have any information. If Skycoq turned scum, then it might suggest that Beet is scum and not just playing his normal game. If Beet turns scum then his mediation becomes suss and we can look more carefully at who he was trying to subtly defend.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
bowmore posted:I hammered Coq what poo poo, sorry
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
everythingWasBees posted:nah, it was more me wondering who would be worth voting for. 'cause if you learn that someone is scum but it doesn't suggest anything else, then you have on scum down but you don't have any information. If Skycoq turned scum, then it might suggest that Beet is scum and not just playing his normal game. If Beet turns scum then his mediation becomes suss and we can look more carefully at who he was trying to subtly defend. alright
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
i'm fairly fine with saying i think everythingWasBees and Those On My Left are town atm
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:46
|
|
|
I don't buy Mithranderp as scum either unless he is known for hard bussing
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:Honestly Beet you're at the top of my list so if you could put forward an alternative theory I'd appreciate it. I literally don't have the time this morning. What theory? I poked bowmore last night for being suss and he pokes me back today. Two votes on me out the gate for sticking on a scum lynch last night and refusing to budge once we risk a no lynch. Not sure what else I can say except bowmore and toml both wanted to lynch the survivor, not the scum.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
Throughout the whole game Beet has been subtly defending SKY COQ, go back and read through he doesn't go full out defense mode because well, they are probably scum buddies Matthew Beet posted:Wow scum rush out of the door on me. I'm gonna sit here and laugh at this latest tactic.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:52
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Two votes on me out the gate for sticking on a scum lynch last night
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
Gwynplaine is the worst lurker
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:55
|
|
|
Gwynplaine posted:TOML made this point last time he was a big ol scum. Post count means nothing. Gwynplaine posted:Is there anything a person can have that will protect them from the SK, or do they need outside protection?  more worried about being killed by the SK than catching scum
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
would lynch Gwynplaine.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
Gwynplaine posted:People spoke the same of me when I was vanilla town. Early games are nerve wracking. ok
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:58
|
|
|
##vote Gwynplaine
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 01:59
|
|
|
No scum hunting from Gwynplaine, has only voted for MC Eating Disorder when he asked to be voted for and Beet for no reasons given. Most of their posts are expressing worries about a potential SK, which would be a threat to them.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
i would like people to bounce ideas off, or just vote Gwynplaine maybe I'm posting toooo much
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:05
|
|
|
dude, bowmore, slow down. take a deep breath. one post at a time. like, your reasons on gwynplaine make pretty good sense, but I'm more interested in beets reaction to you and bees coming at him early. you and me both have pretty towny feelings about bees, I think? beet calling scum on both of you like that is...scummy. ##vote Matthew Beet
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:07
|
|
|
I'm honestly happy with beet or Gwynplaine at this point
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
but I'm 99% convinced Gwynplaine is scum, i'm at about 75/80% with Beet
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
gwynplaine famously has a super low postcount in mafia games. if gwyn is asking about bulletproof because he himself is bulletproof, i think it's really, really unlikely that he's scum. anidav putting in a bulletproof scum in a game with a serial killer would just be insanely anti-town
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:gwynplaine famously has a super low postcount in mafia games.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:11
|
|
|
Gwynplaine posted:Is there anything a person can have that will protect them from the SK, or do they need outside protection? then Asphyxious told Gwyn about bulletproofs and then this one a bit later Gwynplaine posted:TOML made this point last time he was a big ol scum. Post count means nothing. and then a vote on beet and they checked out, never to be seen again
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
can you crazy mother fuckers please unvote, i really don't want scum to hammer and end the day before noon
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
many an auspol lynch has gone awry because someone phrased something weirdly and goons obsessed about it. I've been hit by that myself before.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
seriously it was like Gwyn was trying to oddly hint they had night protection, or fake hint they have it so they don't get targeted
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
yeah no worries TOML, I didn't realize we were so close ##unvote
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:can you crazy mother fuckers please unvote, i really don't want scum to hammer and end the day before noon
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 12:06 |
|
|
well now it's totally fine
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 02:15
|
|