|
Matthew Beet posted:i'm pretty sure they wont. what makes you so godamn sure, wise guy?
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 07:11 |
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:30
|
|
|
Mith what are you thinking, Gwyn or Ken?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:30
|
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:30
|
|
|
Gwyn actually has 0 votes right now, weird
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:31
|
|
|
We have the numbers for anyone though
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:31
|
|
|
bowmore posted:bp could have been a fake claim, no way to test that without a flip really i'm of the same opinion. we literally cannot prove that until he's lynched... you said him role claiming made his role useless. how so?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:33
|
|
|
TOML isn't around (playing cards?) Bees is in a different timezone, Gwyn had been real quiet all day.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:33
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:what makes you so godamn sure, wise guy? because im leaning to you being scum, and if you are, they're probably not goign to hammer you. savvy?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:33
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:i'm of the same opinion. we literally cannot prove that until he's lynched... the idea of a town bulletproof is to waste a night kill by scum or SK - knowing who they are means that kill won't be wasted.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:34
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:you said him role claiming made his role useless. how so? the whole element of BP is like a "surprise fuckers, you couldn't kill me" usually claiming BP out of nowhere is trying to say "please don't target me, i'm not actually BP" OR fake claiming the reason they haven't been killed yet
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:35
|
|
|
claiming BP is doing the opposite of what a town BP should aim to do, draw a night kill
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:35
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:because im leaning to you being scum, and if you are, they're probably not goign to hammer you. savvy? yeah, wow, real solid reasoning. 'lean' a little softer though in case you house of cards collapses.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:36
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:the idea of a town bulletproof is to waste a night kill by scum or SK - knowing who they are means that kill won't be wasted. but then he's still a townie left alive. he said he's LIMITED bullet proof. by announcing he is either way (limited or not) the SK and scum are never gonna bother. follow?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:36
|
|
|
bowmore posted:claiming BP is doing the opposite of what a town BP should aim to do, draw a night kill yeah okay this is a solid point. cheers.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:36
|
|
|
bowmore posted:because now the scum/sk are not going to try and kill him, which means they won't waste a kill on him and just kill someone else so based on this and in light of tonight illuminating conversation. who do you feel more confident on?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:37
|
|
|
gently caress I dunno ;O
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:37
|
|
|
bowmore posted:claiming BP is doing the opposite of what a town BP should aim to do, draw a night kill yeah it screams third party Matthew Beet posted:but then he's still a townie left alive. he said he's LIMITED bullet proof. by announcing he is either way (limited or not) the SK and scum are never gonna bother. follow? yeah, assuming he's not just fake claiming. I agree with you on that point.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:38
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:yeah, wow, real solid reasoning. 'lean' a little softer though in case you house of cards collapses. hang on let me go quote that post where you said you're all chill. Why didn't you correct bowmore last night? you did indeed follow up on gaspy's vote. you've completely ignored me raising that point tonight tbk...
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:38
|
|
|
what is the %chance that Gwyn was just being an idiot when asking about the BP
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:38
|
|
|
bulletproof scum would only make sense if there was a vig, and even that would be a lovely move.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:39
|
|
|
IDK who I think is more scummy. Gwyn my gut says is more scummy, but his bulletproof thing is doing a number on me. TBK has a really bad voting record so far, so that's not good, but neither does Gwyn. I'm not sure how I feel about TOML's vote for TBK, they have been pretty in sync the whole game. But I'm still only borderline on TOML so 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:39
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:bulletproof scum would only make sense if there was a vig, and even that would be a lovely move.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:39
|
|
|
bowmore posted:what is the %chance that Gwyn was just being an idiot when asking about the BP for gwyn? it's probably he's fourth or fifth game ever. but im sure he played in gaspy's role heavy games so the idea of him not knowing about BP or it being new to him is kind of a stretch.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:40
|
|
|
ok going back to my gut ##vote Gwyn
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:40
|
|
|
idk man idk
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:41
|
|
|
I think it's perfectly reasonable for scum to have BP if there is a serial killer
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:41
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:hang on let me go quote that post where you said you're all chill. yeah sorry for being unchill one vote from hammer in the late game. why didn't I correct him? uh because he wasn't wrong, I wasn't chucking an complete wobbly at gaspys voting. a few one line inquiries do not an inquisition make
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:41
|
|
|
Mithranderp posted:IDK who I think is more scummy. yeah this last bit really bothers me. the narrative i have in my head currently: TBK is scum, gwyns innocent and dumb (sorry) so by association is toml scum? no not from whta i've seen, but there's a lot of positive back and forth between toml and tbk that confuses me. until today. so if gywn, who else ?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:44
|
|
|
bowmore posted:I think it's perfectly reasonable for scum to have BP if there is a serial killer hang on. without knowing miths role (don't claim) that means scum have a role blocker, a bullet proof and the game has a SK. the game seems to be very heavily weighted one way then, wouldn't it?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:45
|
|
|
can we make a decision now? I gotta do dishes!
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:45
|
|
|
I'll back the play on Gwyn. Nothing in this game makes sense anymore. ##vote Gwynplaine
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:45
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:hang on. without knowing miths role (don't claim) that means scum have a role blocker, a bullet proof and the game has a SK. I guess roleblocker and BP would kind of do the same thing, except one is passive and one is active
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:46
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:yeah sorry for being unchill one vote from hammer in the late game. but you never mentioned it. you never said once that you were curious. it's like you were happy to fall in line with bowmores assumption that you had never commented on it.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:46
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:yeah this last bit really bothers me. the narrative i have in my head currently: EWB maybe? Possible explanation is that maybe TBK was buddying up to TOML to get in his good graces.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:47
|
|
|
bowmore posted:oh yeah well it's limited role blocker and i've had this argumetn before with gaspy. i see that as an active role. bowmore posted:can we make a decision now? I gotta do dishes! have no fear i'm not gonna let a no lynch go through. it'll probably be gwyn at this rate because of ~numbers~ even though tbk is just a nose out in front on my scumdar.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:48
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:but you never mentioned it. you never said once that you were curious. it's like you were happy to fall in line with bowmores assumption that you had never commented on it. really not sure what your getting at here.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:48
|
|
|
Mithranderp posted:EWB maybe? yeah but you don't do that as town. why do you need to buddy up? it was reciprocated by toml too.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:48
|
|
|
Mithranderp posted:EWB maybe? if I was it hasn't worked.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 07:11 |
|
|
all that wasted agreeing.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2015 12:49
|
|