|
In it to lynch beet.
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2015 08:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 19:54 |
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Out. Will be following. gently caress
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2015 08:20
|
|
|
Anidav posted:So the three of you are in despite Beet's absence? Here to party.
Seagull posted:I choose to believe Asphyxious is just really dumb. G-Spot Run posted:did you also hate it when gaspy said the same thing with more words?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2015 13:18
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:maybe im in. but i'll be quiet during the day\ DEAD MAN WALKING
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2015 14:21
|
|
|
Anidav posted:I'd like a few more people, I've sent some PMs out but a lot of people are saying No. I put the word out. Nyeh heh heh heh.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2015 02:40
|
|
|
Harold Krell posted:I would like to play. Do I deliver or what?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:sure, whatever. Nintendo. Hell yeah
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2015 03:49
|
|
|
MC Eating Disorder posted:So I have no idea what the relationship of alignment to flavour is but I got the best console and everyone else can suck it Pretty sure I got the most beloved console of all time, better luck next time.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 01:03
|
|
|
bowmore posted:2nd vote is a scum vote Holy poo poo I totally missed that bowmore was playing, awesome.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:##unvote Harold Krell is a gem of a player and given that I personally invited him to this game, I have no choice but to take any aggression towards him as a personal attack.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 02:21
|
|
|
bowmore posted:I bet this is a scum fake claim breadcrumb Bowmore citing TOML as scum twice now.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
##vote thatbastardken
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
Blurbstrike
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 07:13
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:##vote Asphyxious Not this time 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 07:14
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:uhh I'll take an anyone lynch, I just think people do it for the wrong reasons. If he's scum (the idea why were lynching him) then he's in practice more valuable to keep around as he fucks up the scum team something fierce, If he's not scum, scum are pushing hard on a krell lynch as an easy move through day one. But I won't like "refuse to hammer him" or some poo poo I'm not actually invested in him.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 08:01
|
|
|
Rather vote for actual scum like my man kenny
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2015 08:04
|
|
|
MC Eating Disorder posted:yo whats up with this series of posts dude Weird like how? What are you up to?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 01:12
|
|
|
Bowmore also hammered early. Not a bad thing but some would argue not a town move. ##vote thatbastardken
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 01:23
|
|
|
bowmore posted:I hammered Krell early, many people would argue that is the best thing for the town and this game. Not me.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
MC Eating Disorder posted:is this still happening or are you stuck on bowmore? And why, pray tell, do you want me lynched? 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:gently caress, what a disaster of a first day. Definitely serial killer.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:asphyxious is active in the other thread, but, yeah, guess he still cbf explaining his vote. "Oh no that guy I was randomly pushing for isn't doing what I want guess I have no choice but to vote for him!" Oh please.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 06:54
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Lol this is such a stretch. Why are you reaching so far on this one toml?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:01
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:there you are again, sitting around, ignoring the perfectly legitimate question that the thread has asked. you're not even engaging, you're just throwing shade on people who are trying to I voted against lynching a towny (more than you've done) I've worked out that there's definitely a SK (more than you've done) I'm not trying to lead a lynch on a town player now (more than you've done)
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:07
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:he's not even responding to any post that asks him a question. he's not saying "hey, gut feeling" or "can't tell you, that would compromise my position". he's just refusing to engage with the thread at all. I've been told I'm not allowed to be "inscrutable" by mith so I guess you'll have to live with it until I hit pay dirt. Thanks for that, Mith. Pro move.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:09
|
|
|
And honestly not engaging with the thread is probably better than being unchill? :mills:
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:10
|
|
|
Maybe because I'm just trying to investigate and see what's going on instead of doing a really obvious beat up? What's wrong with Auspol? its you.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:18
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:what investigation though? you haven't really done anything. Are you psychic now?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:23
|
|
|
Because investigations don't work super great when people know they're being investigated. Like forgive me for not giving a blow by blow of my workings but that kind of defeats the point.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:25
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Because it's a weak argument, and it looks to me you're trying to defend tbk. So I ask you why? Why tbk? I'm out shopping. I'm not going to phone post anything. Especially since I'm still gathering data. You picked up on TOML coming across as defending ken so that's part of it. Picking a serial killer is to do with my role. I picked ken because his day one posts were pretty well identical to the other times he's been scum in size, content and complete non sequitur. Not actually sold on ken but seeing the results from the inevitable discussion that comes from it. There's more.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
Ignoring the question provided conversation. You provided a dummy spit.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:38
|
|
|
That you actually prefaced day one before anything even happened.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:38
|
|
|
*gaspy gives pro town reasons to not lynch krell* "Okay let's all agree to lynch gaspy next"
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:40
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Hmm I'll think on this. Nah I don't think he could have known that. But I already have reason to believe that *someone* already worked out I had a role.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 07:50
|
|
|
Gwynplaine posted:I am really sorry, I might have missed something. I respect that gaspy won't reveal his investigation techniques but how did he prove there was an SK? If explaining that would reveal too much, that's cool but I'm dubious of proof in a game of Mafia. There are always multiple explanations. Whoa don't put words in my mouth and don't misread my posts. I didn't "prove" there was an SK, I know it. And there's no "effort post". I don't do that unless I'm sure I've got a gotcha. Otherwise I just try different things and get what I can from the results.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 08:03
|
|
|
Worried that the lynch won't go the way you want it scumdoc? Bit early to get this desperate.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 08:23
|
|
|
I'll role claim before I die, which will exonerate me. Who will double down? Who will see sense? Why am I not roleclaiming now? Well, you'll see I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 08:27
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:to be more specific i was in a scum team with mith once, and she was scum in a game that i modded Nice 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 09:08
|
|
|
TOML defends ken. Ken backs up TOML. Also  suspicious punctuation
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 09:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 19:54 |
|
|
bowmore posted:##vote Asphyxious I'm prompting ironicat here but do you get paid a dollar for every time you do something stupidly scummy? You're pushing a role claim. Whoop whoop.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2015 09:25
|
|