|
Best Wild and Crazy Kids host? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Annette Chavez |
|
0 | 0% |
| Jessica Gaynes |
|
0 | 0% |
| Omar Gooding |
|
18 | 81.82% |
| Donnie Jeffcoat |
|
4 | 18.18% |
| Total: | 22 votes | ||
|
I'd like to play 
|
#
¿
May 8, 2015 18:51
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 13:03 |
|
|
Confirming that I'm the coolest kid around.
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
imgay posted:Is Omar from the Wire gonna guide us through challenges? "Omar's coming." The cool kid said cupping his hands together on the corner.
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
Where's the Sunny D and Hawaiian Punch? Maybe I'll just drink some surge, but don't tell my folks.
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2015 04:33
|
|
|
Red Pie or Green Pie?
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2015 04:36
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Mced we can start a loser kids gang if you want Can I join your loser kids gang?
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:No grown ups allowed  but I'm a cool kid.
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2015 05:09
|
|
|
FINE. Then I'll start my own gang, where the juice flows free and you never run out of batteries for your game gears.
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
Oh wait, I'm accepted. I made the cut! Totally cool with a 'Z'
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2015 05:14
|
|
|
JakeP posted:they push a boulder off a cliff onto a fat kids head I guess they were bould- -ernough. 
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2015 07:12
|
|
|
imgay posted:if you don't believe me try to visit me tonight Either his admission is a joke, a warning, or an attempt to lure us radicool kids into a nasty grownup trap. *Dips finger into pie cream* Delicious! ##vote imgay
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
Poque posted:
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 04:49
|
|
|
That was an accident, whoops. Proof that I'm a kid.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 04:50
|
|
|
JakeP posted:i agree with asiina in that i agree with merk, i still think asiina is scum though despite how flimsy im sure my reasoning is ##vote JakeP Not necessarily, because of this post, but the post does ping me as scummy. More importantly, I'd like to draw attention to just how flippant Jake's conviction is when it comes to laying down a vote before ultimately landing back on LUTR. The votes feel like they are there to leave a trail of opinion, but it seems like forced activity to me.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 04:59
|
|
|
JakeP posted:my conviction is flippant because its day 1, and I am dont have much to work with That's true, but are you voting for reaction in an attempt to generate content or just placing a vote where opinion shifts? It feels like the latter and that's scummy IMO.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 05:21
|
|
|
I'm guessing that at least one scum has a vote down on this LUTR train. My stake, as voted, is on JakeP.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 15:23
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Why are you guessing that? D1 gutfeels mainly, but I did make a case against him before I turned in last night. Basically, I feel like his flippant voting is forced interaction to appear like he's had history and activity in this thread. Top poster doesn't necessarily mean good poster. In the few games I've played the scum trend I noticed was lurking scum and overly active scum. I feel like the lack of conviction and willingness to switch on a whim is scummy. It may not be the best vote, but it's my vote 
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 16:37
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Alright, that's not bad reasoning or anything, but it doesn't explain why you guess that there's at least one scum on the LUTR bandwagon. I was trying to follow up with my JakeP vote last night, by drawing attention to the votes made on LUTR. JakeP's in particular felt opportunistic, but I see how that can come across as scummy. Vote what you feel. This kid is huntin' Grownups with a big ol' slime balloon.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 16:44
|
|
|
merk posted:What are you saying about LUTR's alignment with this statement? I don't think the votes on LUTR are good votes, but among the votes cast, I feel like JakeP's is scummy. I feel like I run the risk of being labeled as tunneling, but that's just what I've got so far in terms of a D1 read. merk posted:This is what a d1 scum post looks like. Asiina posted:[In regards to LUTR not posting a vote on BK for calling out their gumption.] JakeP posted:i agree with asiina in that i agree with merk, i still think asiina is scum though despite how flimsy im sure my reasoning is JakeP posted:looking back the SK comment does seem kind of jokey, and the 3 scum calls + 1 person, while a little scummy because it assumes a 4 player scum team is just whatever at this point I don't think there is enough content to discern LUTR's alignment. Maybe a tad scummy, but not as much as JakeP IMO.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 17:20
|
|
|
Ghostly Gangsta posted:Seems like a weak agreement adding to your original statement/vote. merk posted:I have more than one post.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 17:23
|
|
|
I see the problem now. You're making my case on JakeP about you when it isn't, but yes, you are right. Let me quote those additional posts.merk posted:She's talking negatively about someone's case with a light nod towards that player being scum without even voting the player. merk posted:Keane, LUTR is scum. I am putting my Merk stamp on this case. Go forward with your plan. merk posted:Also, it doesn't matter whether someone is "right" in making a case. It's all about intent behind content, not accuracy or agreeability. This is the most common SA Mafia town mistake. A last reiteration, my case is not about you. I still feel the votes on LUTR are weak, but I'm trying to identify the scum vote on her and I think it belongs to Jake.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 17:48
|
|
|
Then make a vote instead of fingering suspicion. The case and follow up I made were related so I don't know what to tell you.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 19:43
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Based on what? This is such a cliche thing to say, and scum rely on lovely cliche reasoning for their terrible votes I already made a case on you last night, and have readdressed it for those interested. How's about you read my reasoning for my terrible vote??? 
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 19:52
|
|
|
JakeP posted:agree again There is little reason to think LUTR is scum. Outside of merks casing which isn't at all guaranteed? I have a dissenting opinion so I'm an idiot. 
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 19:54
|
|
|
JakeP posted:I told you why your case is bad already. You are voting me for voting flippantly on day 1, then you tacked on some other dumb poo poo after. I'll listen to anything you have to say when you actually articulate a defense instead of dismissing outright. Until then, whatever dude. My vote is stuck on this belligerent neanderthal.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 19:55
|
|
|
lol I thought it would give some alignment indication. Wellp!
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 21:08
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I said there was no basis for GG to say that at least one person on LUTR was scum. His response was to point out scummy behavior from all the current players on LUTR. Those are different things. I am unable to follow through anymore than I have. The first case I made on JakeP stands by itself, then I said there was a scumvote on LUTR which was directed at JakeP, a direct follow up to the original case. Then when asked about it, I answered. My vote was placed as "stuck" in a moment of frustration, because I couldn't believe how obtuse Jake was being about my case on him. It's one thing to dismiss it, its another to act like an rear end. HOWEVER, I've had time to step away from this game, and I'd be willing to vote on someone else if a better vote presented itself, but the lynch leader is LUTR and I'm just not feeling that. I'm a Kid-Aligned Game Judge, I have a negative utility which I'll discuss if it ever comes up and a pro-town ability that I can use at night. I'm waiting to see how I want to use it though.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 22:29
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Actually GG what in the world was your motivation to claim there? Because you won't let off of me. Also the negative utility bit will probably come up at some point so I figure it's better to hint at it now than later, but we'll see.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2015 22:35
|
|
|
merk posted:GG, please full claim. Sorry, just got home from work. Anyhow since there's no point in not claiming now. I am a Kid-Aligned Game Judge, I am a creepy teenager who is too old to quite fit in with the kids and too young to be considered adult, thus I am a miller who helps to coordinate the efforts of my team. My secondary ability is that each night I can roleblock someone by blapping them with a slime balloon. This was breadcrumbed earlier. I didn't want to full claim because CL already claimed miller and I knew it would cause a poo poo storm when I claimed the same thing(also he was voted almost instantly by none other than JakeP who seems to be ever ready with his mostly baseless voting, which no one seems to care about)
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 01:28
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Like if any of that is true why would you not counter claim the other claimed miller. Why aren't you suspicious of him. Holy hell Because I've never been a miller. Also I don't know the setup of this game.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 01:39
|
|
|
JakeP posted:These two posts dont mesh How so? I was reluctant to claim miller because I thought it would be suspicious. I know what the role entails, but I've still never been one and I've never had to counterclaim anyone so...
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
Samfucius posted:Is it not still D1? It is still D1
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 03:48
|
|
|
Look. I played it dumb, but it is what it is. Cast the votes you think are best and you'll probably be doing a good job. Go kids!
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 03:50
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I've seen two millers before and it's the kind of thing I would totally do, that's not why GG looks bad. It's all the stuff he said about it and the inconsistency Jake pointed out Is it truly an inconsistency? Give me a little slack. Im at -1/-2, if I'm frantic it isn't entirely without reason. I'm about to get blapped myself. Besides, I said I was reluctant because he already claimed. I didn't want to also claim because it not only looked bad, but would seem unbelievable. My options are limited.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 04:08
|
|
|
Asiina posted:That is exactly the inconsistency. If you knew that two millers is a suspicious thing, then why weren't you suspicious of him? I didn't think two millers was suspicious in a set up I knew nothing about. I thought claiming after the window closed on challenging CL was weird and I wasn't going to unless I had too, but claiming at all, kind of derailed that train of thought. Opopanax posted:So back when CL first claimed, why didn't you say anything right then? Also I wasn't really all that active at the time. The only stuff I had going on during that time was an unfunny joke about boulders. I was just posting for the sake of posting and not really paying attention, when I got caught up I realized, much to my chagrin, that my role had already been claimed. I don't think 2 millers is out of the question in a game like this since setup speculation is where we are.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
JakeP posted:You didn't think it was suspicious then why were you so reluctant to share it? How was it challenging CL if it wasnt weird for there to be 2 millers I addressed it. The time had passed. I didn't realize he claimed it right away, I was preoccupied with making stupid jokes to fit in.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 04:17
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Your explanation logically does not make sense, and conradicts itself I don't know what to tell you. It was requested that I full claim, I did.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 04:18
|
|
|
JakeP posted:What difference does that make As far as my bad logic is concerned, it makes a huge difference. The window to bring it up had passed. If someone had copped me I'd come clean. I thought by saying I had a negative utility and hinting at a pro-town ability, I'd buy me enough time to prove my worth, but that is clearly not the case. I goofed up.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 04:21
|
|
|
JakeP posted:You arent answering my question. You said you didn't claim because CL already claimed miller and you didn't want to start a distracting line of thought in the game, but you also say you didn't know 2 millers was weird, so why would it have been a distraction? I said distraction in none of my posts. I'm confused where you're getting that from. I want to answer your questions, but I'm not entirely sure what they are or I think I did answer them. What are you curious about and I'll answer it.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 04:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 13:03 |
|
|
JakeP posted:Sorry, poo poo storm This current predicament I find myself in being the poo poo storm in reference lol. pedantic?! Ugghhh.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2015 04:27
|
|