Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
afterhours
Jul 1, 2007

Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:

According to Josh this lead him to Christ

Lord works in mysterious ways :iiam:

I don't get this. I thought the Duggars already had Christ. They found Christ the first time when they had a miscarriage before their first son was born? Pretty sure Jesus touched Josh way before Josh touched his sisters.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

afterhours
Jul 1, 2007

thrawn527 posted:

I remember when I first started having real problems with my Catholic upbringing. It was the first time, I think it was in middle school, that someone told me, "As Catholics, we believe in transubstantiation. So we believe that the wine actually becomes the blood of Christ, and the bread actually becomes the body of Christ." To which I said, "You mean symbolically, right?" And was told, "No, we believe it actually transforms." My response of, "...well I don't," wasn't all that popular.

Like, does it just transform into blood that just happens to taste like wine? Because that's still wine.

I always thought Jesus was pretty tasty. There's a candy from Mexico that tastes like Jesus. If you want to get your friends to try some, saying that is not a good selling point.

afterhours
Jul 1, 2007

Say Nothing posted:

The sheer asymmetry of that face is disturbing.

And yes, it is a sign of inbreeding.



crackton posted:

Holy poo poo! Just looked this up and the kid actually looks like this, I thought it was some weird magazine misprint.

I don't know, the kid doesn't look that...



Oh.

afterhours
Jul 1, 2007


What the hell is going on here?

afterhours
Jul 1, 2007
"As parents, you're not mandatory reporters... The law allows for parents to do what they think is best for their child."

:fuckoff:

afterhours
Jul 1, 2007
The phrasing they used when describing the timeline struck me as odd. Basically they said the first time he touched the two oldest girls when they were in bed, then he told his parents. The second time, he touched a few of the girls while they were sleeping on the couch, then he told his parents. Then the father said something along the lines of "he touched them on top of the clothing a couple more times," and "he touched them under the clothing a couple more times." Then he said "on the third time he touched them, he told us and we knew we were in over our head." So he touched them once, twice, a couple more times, a couple more times, then a third time? That seems like more than three times, Jim "I'm not a mandated reporter" Bob.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

afterhours
Jul 1, 2007
Josh's turn on's: women_with_children.

  • Locked thread