|
hm
|
#
¿
May 30, 2015 04:17
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 25, 2022 00:01 |
|
|
I will do my very best to only be mean to people I like.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2015 15:16
|
|
|
Confirming that I am vanilla town.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
##vote keane
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2015 20:05
|
|
|
as a show of good faith that we're all willing to play along with each other sure
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2015 20:43
|
|
|
a, met, why aren't you voting keane instead of merk I think his thing is a lot more egregious
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2015 20:45
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:A no-hang is a bad idea. I don't think I need to specify that further but just tossing that out there. this game is nightless 
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2015 20:46
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:How do you figure? apply this argument Tremendous Taste posted:if it catches on and met flips town it's avoidable via housekeeping/principle argument to this post CCKeane posted:That said, I'm going to lay out a non-joke case and propose Met or Ecco for today, in order to avoid PETTY SQUABBLING. but unlike merk, Keane doesn't actually have a dog in the fight, he's just ~helpfully~ proposing an alignment-neutral dunk on one of two people before even seeing if their being in the game together is going to be an issue. it's bad.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2015 20:53
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Do you find merk suspicious for doing the same thing, PM? Just want to clarify.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2015 22:23
|
|
|
my reason for voting keane is impeccable
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2015 15:27
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:If being a vig is not related to alignment in a discernible way then I would not be opposed everyone with a vig claiming so we can keep them in mind. what do you think this accomplishes vigs aren't in addition to a day's dunk, they replace a day's dunk if you can get a majority vote on someone, you just dunk them, you don't vig them, there's no point.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2015 16:22
|
|
|
you also asked keane not to thunderdome you because you have a family 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2015 17:07
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:It means voting lovely players first
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2015 18:42
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:
Everybody was doing a great job being civil to each other before you.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2015 18:44
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:im glad that we are perpetuating the joke phase for another few hours. its a good thing we can afford that luxury with all the cool and in-depth posts that have been made with the deadline approaching the deadline is over 24 hours away chill
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2015 19:32
|
|
|
i feel extending the deadline a further 24 hours after the second vig may have been a mistake~
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2015 18:40
|
|
|
##vote mcs i don't know if he's scum but i know i don't want to play with him
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2015 22:53
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:This worked for you once. Will you get lucky one more time? Still even though he's being a dick but I don't think he's scum. I'm not proposing it as a scum hunting strategy, I'm proposing it as a "let's not have a guy calling people names in every post" strategy.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2015 00:43
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:This worked for you once. Will you get lucky one more time? I want you all to look at this response to me voting betrayer and ##vote 100yrs with me tia
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2015 03:08
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Where would've scum voted here? For the town band wagon or elsewhere to avoid that? I wish I could make something out of this but it'd be too hypothetical. I forget what the acronym we use to describe those sort of arguments is. WIFOM - wine in front of me. 100YrsofAttitude posted:I'd like to correct myself here. I want to make this a negative. You can't take anything I say at face-value. That's what I wanted to say. I don't know if you think I was trying to imply anything in my comment but I certainly wasn't. It looks the world to me like false engagement.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2015 12:08
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:The Ecco Gambit, which seems to be LUTR's reasoning for the lynch (Ibid)works more in theory than in practice, where it can act as smokescreen for scum looking for an easy target. i found scum with the ecco gambit 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2015 01:49
|
|
|
i'm useful + around + already voting for scum
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
who hasn't read a canticle for leibowitz though my non-sci-fi reading mom has read it there's a babylon 5 episode
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2015 02:54
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:PMom vote Shankakin. i feel good about my vote
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
gulag 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
##vote lutr
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2015 22:46
|
|
|
Not around for deadline I'm at a show xoxo
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2015 00:19
|
|
|
Vigging a scumbuddy d1 is an easy way to gain cred, but You could see that Ecco and Taste were about to get into a ridiculous and personal argument and as scum I think I'd like to get out of the way of that and let them poo poo up the thread.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2015 00:52
|
|
|
somber?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2015 04:26
|
|
|
I've been drinking for the last four hours Vote lurt?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:do cookies prevent scurvy maybe
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
MEDS CURE SCHIZOS posted:Let the record show that I'm being remarkably civil, all things considered. nah
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:To be quite candid, lol
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2015 01:05
|
|
|
I've been coasting on not having opinions about people tbh
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2015 22:31
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:That's cool. Tell me when you have an opinion. You think I'm the best kill today?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2015 01:12
|
|
|
##vote taste doing him a favour
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2015 01:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 25, 2022 00:01 |
|
|
i have to figure signing up for a game without power roles was a genuine mistake on his part
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2015 01:25
|
|