|
EXAKT Science posted:So if you Rolecop 7 and get VANILLA, VIGILANTE, you will know that the vigilante is one of 1-6 AH! I did miss that second part, that makes it a little more useful I agree.
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 09:38 |
|
|
Thank you for the advice. I, the Rolecop, will use it well.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 06:02
|
|
|
Little Mac posted:Thank you for the advice. I, the Rolecop, will use it well. Someone rolecop this guy plz and town cop and vig thx
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 06:05
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:Someone rolecop this guy plz you don't wanna vote him tho? did you roll scum again bird? ##vote birdstrike
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 06:14
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:you don't wanna vote him tho? did you roll scum again bird? look at this guy trying to play mafia or something. sheeeeeeeeeit
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 06:29
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:look at this guy trying to play mafia or something. i'm just trying to take part in jokephase like everybody else, but i have a serious role: cop.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 06:45
|
|
|
it means i have to take every post VERY SERIOUSLY
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 06:47
|
|
|
That role was a steal for your position in the draft. Lucky you're a high character guy with upside.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 06:49
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:That role was a steal for your position in the draft. and enormous balls 
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 06:53
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  Birdstrike (1): Birdstrike, Not Voting (13): Birdstrike, Ghastly Gangsta, Grandicap, GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE, Hal Incandenza, Kumbamontu, Little Mac, MMM Whatchya Say, Murmur Twin, OmegaGoo, Opopanax, oxidation, yumingWith 14 alive, it's 8 votes to lynch. The current deadline is June 29th, 2015 at 1:59 a.m. EDT -- that's in about 2 days, 18 hours.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 12:00
|
|
|
DRAFT ORDER posted:1. Omega ##vote Diqnol If you think about it, the people on the bottom of the draft order are fundamentally less likely to contribute to hunting scum as those of us at the top, and we can't afford to take out people with useful skills. I know that might seem unfair to those at the bottom, but hey - if they don't like it they should have picked better numbers.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 13:42
|
|
|
OmegaGoo posted:Would it be inappropriate for a new person to SA Mafia (but not mafia in general) to sign up for this game? I just remembered you're new to SA Mafia so just FYI Diqnol = GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 13:48
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:##vote Diqnol And you picked me to demonstrate your point? Why would I not contribute? Let's kill this idea right now in its cradle. Unabated classism! ##vote Murmur Twin
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 13:51
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:I just remembered you're new to SA Mafia so just FYI Diqnol = GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE Oh thank goodness. The fact that Pizza wasn't on the list confused me!
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 13:53
|
|
|
I want you all to really, truly think about what Murmur is saying there. She is saying that people without roles are less likely to scum hunt. That's a terrible thought at all, but she then applied it to me, the mafia post monster, making it just that much worse. It's almost like her thought is so absurd that it must be an attempt to jumpstart conversation...I only wish she had let someone else do it so the premise was less bad.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 13:59
|
|
|
Eh, it really depends on what people are used to doing or how they play more than what role they have. I do agree losing power roles is a bitch, but vanillas can scumhunt just as well. So I won't think REALLY hard on it, but I will consider it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:02
|
|
|
OmegaGoo posted:Eh, it really depends on what people are used to doing or how they play more than what role they have. I do agree losing power roles is a bitch, but vanillas can scumhunt just as well. Right, but we don't know what alignment people were in their roles, only what order people picked in. We aren't here to hang people for not having power roles. That's objectively bad mafia. We're here to hang people who are scum and do not discriminate beyond that. In addition, a role nobody picked might have made it to near the bottom. It's a mind numbingly bad plan and I'm irritated she picked me over someone less likely to be irritated. Like, I was always going to contribute plenty today. Targeting me seems...lazy. Very lazy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:08
|
|
|
OmegaGoo posted:Eh, it really depends on what people are used to doing or how they play more than what role they have. I do agree losing power roles is a bitch, but vanillas can scumhunt just as well. We're fighting a War on Scum, people. Can we really afford to coddle these Vanilla Towns while hard-working people with skills are murdered? GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Targeting me seems...lazy. Very lazy. What do you call leeching information and protection off of those of us who studied hard during the number selection phase?  GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:It's almost like her thought is so absurd that it must be an attempt to jumpstart conversation... I'm just asking questions. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:14
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:##vote Diqnol MMT have you made a corresponding post in the scum doc saying you should kill people on the top of the list?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:14
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:##vote Diqnol I don't get it, why are people more likely to be vanillas less likely to contribute
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:15
|
|
|
That literally made no sense and figured MMT was making a joke but now I am not so sure
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:16
|
|
|
VTs are the hardworking folk that form the backbone of this town
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:17
|
|
|
MMT consider this, the scum players with power roles are the most threatening so we should target players high on the list ##vote MMT
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:18
|
|
|
MMM Whatchya Say posted:VTs are the hardworking folk that form the backbone of this town  i'm starting to get uncomfortable with the idea that people might think I actually think like this, I assure you I'm just roleplaying Bad Conservative Stereotype
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:20
|
|
|
MMM Whatchya Say posted:MMT consider this, the scum players with power roles are the most threatening so we should target players high on the list ##vote MMT I like the cut of MMM's jib.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:24
|
|
|
MMT I got the conservative thing after your initial post but I'm still a bit concerned that the first post was maybe a bit real
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:24
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:
Unpopular opinion, better back off quickly... ##vote MMT
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:28
|
|
|
It seems like a pretty smooth back off in that it begins in the first post
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:32
|
|
|
I know I said the same thing but looking back it seems a bit better.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:33
|
|
|
MMM Whatchya Say posted:MMT I got the conservative thing after your initial post but I'm still a bit concerned that the first post was maybe a bit real Grandicap posted:Unpopular opinion, better back off quickly... To be clear, you guys are saying you think that was an honest attempt to get Diqnol lynched?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:35
|
|
|
Well, they (and I) probably expected there to be an argument levied against people low on the list, just perhaps as a part of a later case or defense. That you came out of the gate like that is troubling, troubling indeed. It's not that you were trying to hang me per se but rather that you seemed to be forcing the idea so hard that it seems more like you're scum who isn't too good at the early game jokiness.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:38
|
|
|
Apparently I'm playing a naive Conservative who votes along party lines!  Point being is this oughta be good.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:42
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:We're fighting a War on Scum, people. Can we really afford to coddle these Vanilla Towns while hard-working people with skills are murdered? You might think it's the liberal media, but you can't argue with pure science. If I were to take a follicle of yours and put it under a microscope, I would find stock portfolios and contempt for humanity strung together with nutella where a normal person might have a strand of DNA. You don't fool us. Remember this the next time you try to screw over the little guy: A phone with 1% can't even send a text.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:45
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Well, they (and I) probably expected there to be an argument levied against people low on the list, just perhaps as a part of a later case or defense. That you came out of the gate like that is troubling, troubling indeed. It's not that you were trying to hang me per se but rather that you seemed to be forcing the idea so hard that it seems more like you're scum who isn't too good at the early game jokiness. this says my thoughts better than i could have said them
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:49
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Well, they (and I) probably expected there to be an argument levied against people low on the list, just perhaps as a part of a later case or defense. That you came out of the gate like that is troubling, troubling indeed. It's not that you were trying to hang me per se but rather that you seemed to be forcing the idea so hard that it seems more like you're scum who isn't too good at the early game jokiness. I do think there is a certain amount of strategy in realizing that people near the top of the list are more likely to be PRs than people near the bottom. I just feel like (a) that's obvious and (b) it shouldn't be the sole determining factor in who we vote lynch right at the beginning of D1 when there are better things to look for. For example, Grandicap posted:Unpopular opinion, better back off quickly... This looks like scum throwing in a bandwagon vote to me. ##vote Grandicap
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:50
|
|
|
Good morning! I am leaving soon ~yay camping~ and will read this game on the drive up. bbl~
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:52
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:To be clear, you guys are saying you think that was an honest attempt to get Diqnol lynched? read maybe my very next posts? But yeah basically what diqnol said and what you yourself said here: Murmur Twin posted:I do think there is a certain amount of strategy in realizing that people near the top of the list are more likely to be PRs than people near the bottom. I just feel like (a) that's obvious and (b) it shouldn't be the sole determining factor in who we vote lynch right at the beginning of D1 when there are better things to look for. For example, I figured there was a core of truth to it that is still a little uncomfortable
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:58
|
|
|
Just because we're at the bottom of the list doesn't mean we deserve life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness any less.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:59
|
|
|
oxidation posted:Just because we're at the bottom of the list doesn't mean we deserve life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness any less. What? You people at the bottom don't have rights!
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 15:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 09:38 |
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:##vote Diqnol This is the initial post. There was a list in here but nested quotes are sucky. I do not see this as setting up a joke, it is a policy vote on a newly instituted policy. This is laying the foundation to vote people lower on the list with less scrutiny. If he knows his scumbuddies are higher on the list it allows him the ability to sway the lynch towards these people without the explicit tie to them. It is scummy at the outset. On top of that, as soon as people start calling him out on it he backs off, hard, with it was just a joke, lol. Conservatives. He is backing off of the unpopular opinion because it is too hot for him. He is scum.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 15:24
|
|