SWOLFIA (Your thread title contains invalid characters. Go back and fix it)

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Traditional Games > The Game Room > SWOLFIA (Your thread title contains invalid characters. Go back and fix it)

«‹›5 »

Fast Luck: Feb 2, 1988

Taste has pushed hard for KB and PMush so far and welp. That said, reading the spat he had with KB makes me think he's very likely to be town. If he's scum, he knows KB is town and yet very nearly got him lynched while promising to quit mafia forever if KB flipped town. That's a town read unless Taste actually wants to quit mafia haha. That's also why toxxes and stuff are against the rules though

# ¿ Jun 30, 2015 15:50

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 16:07

Fast Luck: Feb 2, 1988

While PMush voting you as a test to see your reaction would have made sense, I don't really feel like that's what she was doing. I think it was just her way of reading the game. Just like I don't think her case on Chic made a lot of sense, it was still her read on the game. And btw, I still think Chic has been pretty quiet for an experienced mafia player, so I'm not sure on her, I just didn't like PMush's reasoning. That said, PMush never felt insincere to me, which I said and is why I held off on voting her. Ultimately though, I did not want to no lynch so that's why I moved my vote near the end once it was clear nothing else was happening.

And this goes to Prop and Taste's discussion where they're both correct because it's a splitting of hairs. Not all that many people thought PMush was scum, but most people did agree that some of the content she was coming up with was bad.

Let me say that I think Daisy should be more chatty. Even if she doesn't have any strong feelings on account of being new, I feel like a town Daisy should be talking anyway. Also, EXAKT came roaring in voting 8Bux for reasons that don't hold up imo. Not sure what to make of that. Other people I feel have been townish or null to me.

# ¿ Jun 30, 2015 22:00

Fast Luck: Feb 2, 1988

TMMadman posted:

I put my vote on PMom and it's staying there until someone can give me a better reason. PMom set the table for people to look at PMush and then hammered at it again a day later. The defense of the "PMush is posting bad content" argument seems to be a series of entirely low content posts and a reinterpreted quote. I'd also like to point out that PMom has come to the defense of Taste twice already. First, he stepped into the KB/TT spat by saying a TT vote is bad and voting KB and then did basically the exact same thing with the PMush vote but it's screened a bit by the reaction caused from PMush voting me. That is why I am also suspicious of Taste as well and I feel like they are working together. Allen and Met are just general suspicion from being associated with it at the moment.

Frankie just squawked "Vote PMom"

Okay, so I agree that Poison making a bad vote wasn't all that scummy but could have been used as an excuse to take her down. However, why would a scum player need to do that? I guess one possibility is they just wanted to seem towny. In PMom's case, he'd be portraying himself as an aggressive town scumhunter. In the case of the next few voters, they could be more cautious scum just jumping on the bandwagon because it was an easy vote to make. But in both cases, by doing this they saved the other potential target, imgay, who was the only other player that seemed feasibly at risk. If you read imgay, he starts off mostly just poo poo posting, then he makes that post upset about people judging him on past content, and then on D2 he made that post about not particularly liking the PMom/Taste interplay. Could other scum have saved him on D1 and told him to get his rear end in line? If you're looking at a list of four or five people and saying "well one of these people is probably scum" that's not giving us much but if you look at the alternative vote target list, the list of people who got bailed out, that was only one guy. I think I'll join team ##vote imgay.

That said, if we were to assume PMom is scum and then reread his posts, is there anything that jumps out? That could help the PMom case so that it's not entirely hinging on having voted PMush along with several others.

# ¿ Jul 1, 2015 12:38

Fast Luck: Feb 2, 1988

This is the second time you've done this, Taste. First 8Bux made a post, you said "Are you scum" and he said no and explained his post, and you said the explanation was unnecessary, when it was completely natural because your question implied you had an issue with his previous post. Now you told Madman about WIFOM in reply to his post, and he took it to mean you were saying his post was venturing into WIFOM territory, and again you're saying that's not what you said. In both cases, a reasonable person would think you're implying what they thought you were implying

# ¿ Jul 1, 2015 15:03

Fast Luck: Feb 2, 1988