|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:I don't know, you hardly posted until recently. Do you think it's weird that Gamer missed that as well?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 18:48 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 04:22 |
wait missed what
|
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 18:50 |
Oh wait, I see. He did make a vote. That's fair.
|
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 18:52 |
|
Quidnose posted:Do you think it's weird that Gamer missed that as well? I don't make an alignment call off missing a post.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 18:55 |
Gamerofthegame posted:
You actually literally made a post that was actually role fishing at the time, and I don't see how that makes my point any less valid. You were quite clearly the scum's choice for the day. Why is this surprising? Also, Gamer pointed out something about Quid that I missed: What town doesn't immediately check who died during the night? Wouldn't a town player think to check that in case they died? The only people that can reasonably assume they are safe are scum. ##vote Quidnose
|
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 19:47 |
Gamerofthegame posted:Hmm... re-reading. This is the post in question. Keep in mind that I saw myself as the easy bandwagon vote at the time and was looking at anyone jumping on me with suspicion, given what was going on. You had already voted me, but then followed up with unvoting me for some reason and also pretty much rolefishing in the same post. I thought it was scummy.
|
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 19:54 |
|
merk posted:Let's start today like this: ##vote Squiggly For the second time this game, why?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:17 |
|
merk posted:Hey Squiggly, who do you think is scum now? I'll humor you: I dunno. Two of the four people I posted about are dead and flipped scum Gamer has a bunch of poo poo posts, but he might just be a lovely poster. Only time will tell And for some OMGUS I don't like you merk. I remember you playing with actual reasons and contributions and so far your posts are pretty lacking in content
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:20 |
|
Max posted:You actually literally made a post that was actually role fishing at the time, and I don't see how that makes my point any less valid. You were quite clearly the scum's choice for the day. Why is this surprising? There were three deaths and I literally just checked quickly while I had a 5 min break in my teaching to see if I was dead and needed to pay attention to this game anymore. This is a dumb reason to vote someone, and is not play based.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:21 |
|
Squiggly posted:For the second time this game, why? Why are you singling out merk when he didn't make the case on you? Why not ask why of the people who are positing cases? Everyone knows merk is being kinda lazy, I think that's scummy, but you don't make a call here. IN FACT: Squiggly posted:I'll humor you: I dunno. Two of the four people I posted about are dead and flipped scum First, you don't actually answer his question, you just say "well the posted people are dead and flipped scum so there." Who do you think is scum NOW? The thing about Gamer is hedgey and useless. And you don't make an alignment call on merk here either, you just say you don't like him. I don't like the way he's playing this game either but I've cased him. This is crap from yooooou. ##unvote ##vote Squiggly
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:23 |
|
Gamerofthegame posted:I don't think scum would actually point out other scum doing that. I had a game where my scum buddy actually joke voted every single scum. I think it was actually Spoonsy. Needless to say, we all got lynched in short order and this is some serious WIFOM
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:25 |
|
Quidnose posted:Why are you singling out merk when he didn't make the case on you? Why not ask why of the people who are positing cases? Everyone knows merk is being kinda lazy, I think that's scummy, but you don't make a call here. What case? That's the point. There is no case and merk voted me without actually explaining why. Did I miss somethig? quote:First, you don't actually answer his question I did answer, you just didn't like it. I said I didn't know because my day 1 reads are mostly gone. You're just making a semantics argument. Now shush and lemme finish reading what's been posted
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:29 |
|
How dare I interrupt your playing mafia to play mafia~
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:31 |
|
Quidnose posted:How dare I interrupt your playing mafia to play mafia~ Answer my questions sassafras. I get redirected here by my phone every time I post and I'd like to finish pages 19 and 20 before I get entangled in some stupid argument
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:33 |
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:All that to say: I like this post. Zzyzx is bugging me too because he tends to not post when scum. All a meta read
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:39 |
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Given Walrus' flip this post (which is a response to Gamer voting Walrus) looks really scummy. Squiggly provides no explanation of his reasoning and I don't see a town motivation in posting this way. I also conveniently didn't actually vote gamer. It's like it was a prod for a reaction
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:41 |
|
Squiggly posted:What case? That's the point. There is no case and merk voted me without actually explaining why. Did I miss somethig? Merk has not posted a case on you, correct. It is also not unreasonable for him to say "I like the cases other people have made" and vote for you for that reason. Are you saying that is not what he is doing?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:42 |
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:I think this series of posts from Squiggly are very scummy. I focused votes off of walrus by...drawing attention to the number of votes on him? I...like...what? Even CCKeane agreed with me that people needed to back off and wait for a claim because that's what happens in mafia But if you really think my weak cry for everyone to leave him at -2 rather than -1 was a ploy to get attention off of walrus, I just don't even know what to tell ya man. Except that it's really awful reasoning and some other ad hominem attacks You're letting one post color the rest of my actions, without merit I do believe
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:46 |
|
Quidnose posted:Merk has not posted a case on you, correct. It is also not unreasonable for him to say "I like the cases other people have made" and vote for you for that reason. Are you saying that is not what he is doing? I'm saying I don't see a case on me until page 20, after merk's post. So no, I don't think he is doing that BUT if he is doing that, I think he should be able to put it into writing, don't you? Why are you literally speaking for merk?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:48 |
|
Squiggly posted:I like this post. Zzyzx is bugging me too because he tends to not post when scum. All a meta read I'm pretty sure 100yrs just hadn't gotten to d2 in his re-read and that's why he posted that, but you've supposedly been following along. I've made several posts about stuff, go read them.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:49 |
|
Hey guys, sorry for the inactivity on the day - finally free of meetings for half an hour (before I go back into meetings) So correct me if I'm wrong, but the case against me is that I me too and low effort post? Okay. Good to know. Sorry I wasn't vocal enough on having been convinced by a post that turned out to be correct in IDing a scum. I see a lot of posts from Quid overnight. A bunch of them are short. I'm still not completely comfortable with the timing thing of yesterday given the Walrus flip. I'm really not getting any scum vibe off Gamer at all. Nothing he's done would really indicate to me that he's not town. Also @ Squiggly I totally think that was me that one time and yeah we all died in short order because logic. So yeah, that's my low effort post of the afternoon. Sorry I don't have time to dig into everyone's accusations at the moment, but that's how I feel right now. Also I am strung out on accidentally under-diluted cold brew coffee.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:54 |
|
Squiggly posted:I'm saying I don't see a case on me until page 20, after merk's post. So no, I don't think he is doing that I confused you and Spoonsy. I retract everything I said. I actually just typed "you and Squiggly," bahahaha
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:56 |
|
Spoonsy posted:I see a lot of posts from Quid overnight. A bunch of them are short. I'm still not completely comfortable with the timing thing of yesterday given the Walrus flip. What does this mean. Are you being sarcastic about my posts being short? quote:I'm really not getting any scum vibe off Gamer at all. Nothing he's done would really indicate to me that he's not town. Did you read my gamer case?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 20:57 |
|
zzyzx posted:I'm pretty sure 100yrs just hadn't gotten to d2 in his re-read and that's why he posted that, but you've supposedly been following along. I've made several posts about stuff, go read them. Wow apparently I blocked out everything after your joke posts. I had no recollection after that and I do apologize. I like you a lot more now I would like to add, however, that while reading it came to my attention that you also made the mistake of analyzing my vote on gamer as a real post as well. Second person to do this. Did you all forget Ecco's rule about unvoting or what Is this the "case" on me? Like yeah I get that it could be scummy if I had actually broken the tie or tried to take momentum away from the walrus train but...I didn't? I'm actually wondering if y'all didn't read the vote counts, Ecco's rules, or are just hitting the view all posts thing. Super confused
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 21:03 |
Squiggly posted:Wow apparently I blocked out everything after your joke posts. I had no recollection after that and I do apologize. I like you a lot more now This has also been confusing for me, but I was actually there when you made that post about holding back on Walrus at the time.
|
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 21:05 |
|
Squiggly posted:(quoting Gamer) What are you trying to do here if not vote for Gamer?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 21:12 |
|
Squiggly posted:I'll humor you: I dunno. Two of the four people I posted about are dead and flipped scum This is why I'm voting you. You lightly touched two of those four people. It looks like distancing.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 21:15 |
|
zzyzx posted:What are you trying to do here if not vote for Gamer? Squiggly posted:I also conveniently didn't actually vote gamer. It's like it was a prod for a reaction I didn't like the post, correct. Didn't mean I actually wanted to vote him though. I feel like there's a difference between the two
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 21:17 |
|
merk posted:This is why I'm voting you. You lightly touched two of those four people. It looks like distancing. I ended the day voting quid I dunno what to tell ya man
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 21:19 |
|
SORRY MY SCUMDAR IS TOO GOOD
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 21:20 |
|
ICR'S OFFICIAL DAY 2 VOTECOUNT!!!!!! Squiggly (3): Merk fiery_valkyrie Quidnose Quidnose (2): Gamerofthegame Max Spoonsy (2): Hal Incandenza zzyzx Max (1): Quinquereme Quinquereme: (1) WHICH WAY MADNESS zzyzx (1): 100YrsofAttitude Merk (0): 100YrsofAttitude (0) Amoeba102 (0) fiery_valkyrie (0) Gamerofthegame (0) Hal Incandenza (0) Nth Doctor (0) Puntification (0) chaoslord (0) WHICH WAY MADNESS (0) wins32767 Not that anyone's done it yet, but make sure to ##unvote before you ##vote again. Iron Chef Ramen fucked around with this message at 21:46 on Jul 15, 2015 |
# ? Jul 15, 2015 21:22 |
|
Squiggly posted:I didn't like the post, correct. Didn't mean I actually wanted to vote him though. I feel like there's a difference between the two Ok, so if you claim you were looking for a reaction, what are your conclusions?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 22:06 |
|
Max posted:FV, how do you feel about Gamer in light of the fact that he was quite obviously the other bandwagon that the scum team was pushing. I think he's very unlikely to be scum given the way QPQ was talking about him.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 22:08 |
|
wins32767 posted:How is that different from normal zzyzx play? I have no idea. Never played with them. Max posted:This I do agree with, and when I actually have the energy I want to go back and really look at who was actively pushing for Gamer to happen yesterday, since he was pretty clearly the scum team's focus. Haven't thought about this angle. It's an interesting point. merk posted:I'm not going to get lynched today. There is a 0% chance that I'm getting lynched today. Just because I agree doesn't mean I can't hate the arrogance in this comment. zzyzx posted:I'm pretty sure 100yrs just hadn't gotten to d2 in his re-read and that's why he posted that, but you've supposedly been following along. I've made several posts about stuff, go read them. ##unvote I had read D2 before reading D1 but I didn't re-read it in light of my new contextualization. What I don't get however is your junk posting even after your vote on D1 and that generally bad vote on your part.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 23:20 |
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:I had read D2 before reading D1 but I didn't re-read it in light of my new contextualization. What I don't get however is your junk posting even after your vote on D1 and that generally bad vote on your part. You said it was an "odd" and "bussy" vote, and now it's "generally bad". What don't you like about it? Likewise, I'm not sure what junk posts you're thinking of. Any in particular?
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 23:49 |
|
It's not arrogance. It's truth.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2015 00:06 |
|
I'm going to ##unvote because I thought I meant Spoonsy over Squiggly but I'm voting Squiggly and honestly I have no idea what the gently caress at this point. Ughhhh
|
# ? Jul 16, 2015 00:11 |
|
Quidnose posted:I'm going to ##unvote because I thought I meant Spoonsy over Squiggly but I'm voting Squiggly and honestly I have no idea what the gently caress at this point. Ughhhh See what buying lightning cables gets you, kids? A pluses and not knowing what the gently caress.
|
# ? Jul 16, 2015 00:21 |
|
So, my current thinking is that there are 3 killing roles so I'd wager the scum team is probably pretty small at this point. With two of their members already dead, they're likely to be really demoralized and lurking or frustrated. Based on punt's posts today, he's a pretty good candidate using those criteria. ##vote punt
|
# ? Jul 16, 2015 01:32 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 04:22 |
|
wins32767 posted:So, my current thinking is that there are 3 killing roles so I'd wager the scum team is probably pretty small at this point. With two of their members already dead, they're likely to be really demoralized and lurking or frustrated. Based on punt's posts today, he's a pretty good candidate using those criteria. Ok let me respond with a post of similar quality: lol @ u
|
# ? Jul 16, 2015 01:57 |