|
Finally Ecco is running a game. I've been waiting forever for that to happen! Love to play.
|
#
¿
Jul 2, 2015 02:07
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 12:01 |
|
|
I am somehow even more legitimately excited for this game than I was before. My excitement level is now 42.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2015 02:37
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Made me sta't thinking about post 'est'ictions. Sometimes the' wo'k out quite fun. Didn't you have a keyboard with a bad "e" at one point?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2015 05:47
|
|
|
I'm fine with whenever Ecco wants to start the game, no hurry at all
|
|
#
¿
Jul 9, 2015 23:26
|
|
|
Hello friends
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2015 23:27
|
|
|
My role PM says this is the game where I should listen to Quidnose. So Quid, what's happening?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
Say the phrase Max!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2015 23:41
|
|
|
wins32767 posted:Hi Hal, are you scum this game? Nope, just good old vanilla town
|
|
#
¿
Jul 11, 2015 00:06
|
|
|
merk posted:Because the dude who made the post is scum. I agree ##vote WalrusWhiskers
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2015 00:09
|
|
|
Quidnose is a loquacious blowhard
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2015 03:22
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:oh balls i messed up the numbering on my footnotes Still, it's the effort that counts. WW is coming across with a tone that feels forced and that post that merk quoted shows someone who wants to look like they are commenting on current events without really saying anything or taking a stance
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2015 06:22
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Do you think a scum player would persist so long in non-cooperation? Seems like he's drawing a lot of attention to himself. It's certainly possible. If he did back down someone else (or maybe even you!) would come in here and point out how he backed down because he was scum who wasn't really invested in his argument or some such thing.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2015 17:31
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Quid, Keane is actually working on contributing more to the game now. What are you doing? I feel like Keane's contributions are actually just a joke
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2015 02:43
|
|
|
yuming posted:Keane reads better on page 14. Quidnose comes across as town. I'm mildly suspicious of Keane. I'm sorry yuming my thoughts at this point don't stretch beyond Walrus and a little bit of Keane. I think I remember seeing a spoonsy post I didn't really like too, I can try and go back and find it if that would help you realize the error of your ways.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
Spoonsy posted:Hey guys how was everyones weekend? Mine was cool. Didn't have to read a hundred or so posts about the same two people bickering. Here yuming, it was this post, spoonsy's only real post of the game. It touches on the vote leaders but doesn't take an actual stance on them, votes no one, and is flanked by jokes/filler. Why bother with this post at all other than to seem engaged?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2015 03:12
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:What do you mean? I mean someone called him out for not scumhunting so he literally walked down the player list saying stuff like "this guys posts look good based on his timezone" and stuff like that. I guess it's unfair to categorize it all as a joke because they are probably real opinions but it has that feel of Keane poking fun at the idea of scumhunting and it isn't like he was making solid cases that he's actively pursuing.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 13, 2015 15:33
|
|
|
I'd be ok with Squiggly but also Spoonsy.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 14, 2015 23:40
|
|
|
I demand some credit for walrus too
|
|
#
¿
Jul 14, 2015 23:53
|
|
|
I tend to agree with Amoeba, coming in with that merk case isn't a play I would see from scum, and Quid's posting really isn't pinging me at all.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
Spoonsy posted:Morning everyone (and Hal) Spoonsy's only other real post this game, checks in to say "well yeah, I did just post that to look like I was doing something" but still can't elaborate on anything or return to the people he cased earlier. Ends with a weak vote on WW that he basically reserves the right to move elsewhere if a better vote (i.e. non-scum vote) comes along. Even his reasoning for the vote looks more like buddying up to Nth than actually analyzing anything about WW. ##vote Spoonsy
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2015 04:33
|
|
|
Quid is totally town I like the case on Squiggly and he has (a bit) more content that Spoonsy to go on but I wish they would both post more.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2015 18:30
|
|
|
Gamerofthegame posted:let's lynch quid guys Seriously though, i agree with... wins I think it was who said that your casing seems earnest and townie but your conclusion doesn't add up for me.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
Nth Doctor posted:I've been feeling my way around these cases made for Spoonsy for the last day or so. Hal's is actually what appears to have made you pull the trigger, zzyzx, but so far: you two are the only two who have taken up this vote against Spoonsy. That's not a bad point. Zzyzx was a little over the top talking about how townie he was earlier too for his vote yesterday which came off as a little more forced than just a joke.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2015 21:19
|
|
|
Squiggly is making me laugh. Laugh at how scummy he is! ##unvote ##vote Squiggly Spoonsy is still a good vote too, but since he said he had real-life issues I'd rather give him a chance to contribute/replace. Squiggly on the other hand has said plenty today and I really don't buy "oh that was an obvious joke" line about the one vote but even if it was he's spent way too much time on an awkward defense of himself and what little looking he has done for scum is pretty forced. Quidnose is like the most frustrating town of all time
|
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2015 06:00
|
|
|
Quidnose stop voting merk that is dumb. Use your powers for something useful
|
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2015 07:03
|
|
|
wins32767 posted:merk, you know I love you but I could write a merk bot that would be indistinguishable from you given all the catchphrases you've built up. merk, would you describe what wins is doing this game as "content lurking?"
|
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2015 07:06
|
|
|
Hello what a great weekend I had and what a great time I had catching up on this thread. Actually I am a little sad I missed the dethy chat. I guess we can't really ASSUME it's a dethy but it does seem fair. I agree with anyone who said three roleblocks is really weird, but it sounds like Amoeba so then it's just 2, right? That seems more believable. Now that I know spoonsy was in a masonry and most of his mason buddies don't seem to think he's scummy I feel better about him.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2015 01:58
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Spoonsy, why zzyzx over wins? Based on the sanity logic it is equally one of them. What about zzyzx's play makes you think it's him over wins? A fair question. I think zzyzx is pretty suspicious for reasons I mentioned yesterday and he's been pretty quiet about actual scum other than pushing for spoonsy, but wins has been very low-key this game and so far his only post today is: wins32767 posted:Amoeba, please claim. and then nothing. He needs to come back and talk more.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2015 02:04
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I can't parse what you are saying. Oh sorry let me try again. I had a good weekend in real life and I liked reading this thread when I came back, I like cracking setup spec so I wish I had been around when that was in full swing. There isn't enough evidence to say it is definitely a dethy setup in that masonry but that feels like it could be right. When I was reading along there was some talk about three roleblocks, but then I got the idea that you know you absorbed a kill and that accounts for one of the roleblocks, but maybe I read that wrong? I don't feel that spoonsy is as scummy as I did earlier in the game because now I know that he was also talking in a masonry and most of those people don't think he's too scummy (except zzyzx) and also the stuff he's posted in the thread today doesn't feel like scum. That was about it, really I didn't say much of anything. Is that more parseable?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2015 02:25
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Yeah, this explains the line I had trouble getting. Yeah I just went back and looked again, so yeah, 3 cops being roleblocked is hard to believe.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Would 2 roleblocks be more believable? Considering that no one has come in sheepishly "sorry guys, yeah that was me on so and so, town roleblocker here", it's safe to assume any blocks were from anti-town sources. Two anti-town roleblockers seems just as unreasonable to me as three anti-town roleblockers. I don't think a town roleblocker would necessarily claim here but I get your point. Two is still more likely than 3, and three that all target cops is extra hard to believe because even if scum know who is in the cop masonry I doubt they would have the ability to roleblock three of them. I mean anything is possible but that just seems to stretch credulity too far so my tendency is to think at least one is lying.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:I was roleblocked as well Ah this was the post I missed the first time and hence my confusion. Everyone was quoting the one where you hadn't posted your result yet. Maybe what's strange is that WWM got a result back at all. Eh this will get me nowhere, going to stop thinking about it.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2015 02:47
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Thinking maybe a target wasn't targetable, ala a Jailer/Hider/Commuter. Yeah that's a good point too. Too many variables.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2015 02:48
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Gut calls: wins more likely scum than zzyzx. Zzyzx's posting doesn't look bad to me and he looks to have put in genuine effort. Wins has really seemed to do much other than comment. Still want to see why he asked me to claim. I'm pretty much on the same page as you. WWM has been giving me a scummy vibe and his opinions don't seem consistent. I disagree with you about Spoonsy though, the woe is me stuff is kind of what made me think he was more likely to be town. I don't see scum acting like that.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2015 05:32
|
|
|
I was really hoping wins would post again, I am fine with voting him but I'll hold off since he's -2 now with some time to go.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:First time you've even mentioned me all game. So?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2015 21:56
|
|
|
Max posted:By that I mean, we can't win with scum. Yes, this. Also as far as I can tell the faction has no killing power unless they have been lying to me, I can't talk to anyone except the recruiter directly so I have no idea. ##vote Amoeba Pretty sure this is the right thing to do.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2015 21:01
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:Oh, also, I don't think Amoeba is the werewolf. Granted, it's speculation on my part, but I think there's a much better explanation around. (Quote this post and laugh at me when I'm wrong) You know who is bulletproof? Werewolves!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2015 21:02
|
|
|
Max posted:I'm sure the rest of the Clarent group is none too pleased with me. Nah it's cool, I think you did the right thing.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2015 21:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 12:01 |
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:We have a short window to turn this around and not lose the game. So you are feeling like WalrusWhiskers was just a mafia aligned goon all on his own and had no teammates?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2015 01:31
|
|