|
Specifically, the orthodox NetBSD.
|
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 17, 2026 13:46 |
|
That they're free as in beer, not freedom.
|
|
|
|
RZApublican posted:That they're free as in beer, not freedom. What do you mean? EDIT: If I recall correctly, the BSDs are both! NetBSD and OpenBSD especially, given that the only things not 'libre' are necessary firmware blobs. dlr fucked around with this message at 00:44 on Jul 10, 2015 |
|
|
|
dlr posted:What do you mean? GPL license vs BSD license.
|
|
|
|
RZApublican posted:GPL license vs BSD license. And how is the BSD license not free as in freedom? Just because it is more permissive than GPL doesn't make it not free. EDIT: This is a good read about the the BSD and GPL licenses, and their different focuses on freedom. dlr fucked around with this message at 00:55 on Jul 10, 2015 |
|
|
|
dlr posted:And how is the BSD license not free as in freedom? Just because it is more permissive than GPL doesn't make it not free.
|
|
|
|
ZFS and jails are life and using FreeBSD gives me a stratospheric sort of elitism that alludes those Linux simpletons for the most part.
|
|
|
|
Nam Taf posted:ZFS and jails are life and using FreeBSD gives me a stratospheric sort of elitism that alludes those Linux simpletons for the most part. Yep. Pretty much, man. I can't help but feel just a tad bit superior.
|
|
|
|
How is ZFS on bsd vs linux?
|
|
|
|
lampey posted:How is ZFS on bsd vs linux? FreeBSD's ZFS support is second only to Solaris, IIRC. Linux lags behind a bit, it seems.
|
|
|
|
Nam Taf posted:ZFS and jails are life and using FreeBSD gives me a stratospheric sort of elitism that alludes those Linux simpletons for the most part. i run a hardenedbsd server and two debian servers, how superior am i?
|
|
|
|
I could never figure out the ports system on *BSD. Apt-get keeps me on Linux.
|
|
|
|
PlesantDilemma posted:I could never figure out the ports system on *BSD. Apt-get keeps me on Linux. Pkg is going to blow your mind
|
|
|
|
PlesantDilemma posted:I could never figure out the ports system on *BSD. Apt-get keeps me on Linux. it's so easy though code:![]() it's even easier if you install ports-mgmt/portmaster; with portmaster you can install multiple ports at once and do all the configuration before you even start building them as opposed to configuring a dependency -> building the dependency -> configuring the next dependency -> building that dependency etc Nam Taf posted:Pkg is going to blow your mind pkg is great but building from ports instead of using precompiled binaries can be advantageous in some scenarios i don't need every single module that nginx ships with for example (support for webdav, mp4/flv etc) so it's nice to be able to just build in what i need as opposed to literally everything RISCy Business fucked around with this message at 04:47 on Aug 31, 2015 |
|
|
|
I love the fact that when a fellow computer/networking geek/engineer asks what my home router box is running I get something of a deer in head lights look when I reply, "BSD". "Oh its not a Linux box?" "Nope." "Oh..." <smug sense of superiority>
|
|
|
|
I love things like pf that aren't on other platforms. I hated reading a changelog to find out why a bunch of ports were broken again.
|
|
|
|
Theo de Raadt. Not so much other things.
|
|
|
|
I set up a kFreeBSD box at home just so I can use pf.
|
|
|
|
Novo posted:I set up a kFreeBSD box at home just so I can use pf. Just use OpenBSD as our lord Theo intended for best pf experience. That's what I use on my internet gateway at home for more than 10 years. Hasn't let me down yet (though im scared of upgrading to 5.7 now because of the named thingy as I don't know how to use yet nsd and unbound).
|
|
|
|
A decent set of documentation that covers everything.
|
|
|
|
I use OS X, op. It's good because it's the world's most advanced desktop operating system and also a BSD I'm told.
|
|
|
|
akadajet posted:I use OS X, op. It's good because it's the world's most advanced desktop operating system and also a BSD I'm told. xnu is a child of the mach and 4.3bsd kernels, yes
|
|
|
|
I love that it has every relevant feature from Illumos because those fuckin nerds weird me out
|
|
|
|
This cute little guy
|
|
|
|
I like that BSD saves me 2 of my 140 valuable characters in a tweet compared to Linux, but dislike that specifically qualifying FreeBSD, OpenBSD or NetBSD takes even more
|
|
|
|
The moral of the story is, don't use Hungarian notation in the name of your operating system.
|
|
|
|
Vulture Culture posted:I love that it has every relevant feature from Illumos because those fuckin nerds weird me out Except for FMD, if you're using ZFS with hotspares they won't be automatically used in the event of a fault. Which is kinda poo poo.
|
|
|
|
MrMoo posted:Theo de Raadt. Theo is my loving idol. Also I like pf. And using an actual unix platform and not some kinda weird GNU unix-like flipperbaby. I still use the flipperbaby for some of my development projects though, because GCC just seems to run better on a GNU/Linux platform and I can't loving figure out how to build a proper working clang cross-compiler.
|
|
|
|
why is he your idol tell me more
|
|
|
|
Most of his epithets are amusing to some degree, here's one about FreeBSD.
|
|
|
|
MrMoo posted:Most of his epithets are amusing to some degree, here's one about FreeBSD.
|
|
|
|
I've only recently started playing around with a FreeBSD VM, but last night I found this crazy guys blog when I was looking at some Playstation 4 reverse engineering stuff: https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/07/11/bsd-encourages-slavery-sonys-orbis-os/ That and the rest of the site is pretty he seems quite angry at BSD
|
|
|
|
Duo posted:I've only recently started playing around with a FreeBSD VM, but last night I found this crazy guys blog when I was looking at some Playstation 4 reverse engineering stuff: https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/07/11/bsd-encourages-slavery-sonys-orbis-os/ Oh, THAT guy. Pretty sure those three ~respectable~ people and him are one person, but hey, if you want to be insane, confining yourself to fringe forums and stupid blogposts is much better than flipping out and shooting people.
|
|
|
|
piss angel posted:it's so easy though You conveniently leave out the interstitial steps: code:Pkg on FreeBSD suffers from the binary packages only being re-compiled once every 2 weeks or so, which means it's always out of date with the ports tree. It's not clear why they can't just re-compile every time a port is updated. Debian has it's flaws, but being able to install a whole list of software in a few seconds with one command was a revelation 10 years ago, and pkg on FreeBSD still isn't close. apt-get has only broken a couple of times in a decade for me.
|
|
|
|
piss angel posted:pkg is great but building from ports instead of using precompiled binaries can be advantageous in some scenarios To me a good operating system should support building everything from source for the rare situations that you actually have a good reason to, but should not be designed to expect or even encourage that you actually do it for more than a few packages. Most users should never have to think about compiling anything. wooger posted:Debian has it's flaws, but being able to install a whole list of software in a few seconds with one command was a revelation 10 years ago, and pkg on FreeBSD still isn't close.
|
|
|
|
wooger posted:You conveniently leave out the interstitial steps: since i don't use freebsd on desktops or anything, i've never had to compile anything overly large like Xorg or firefox/chrome which suits me just fine as a server OS for basically anything, freebsd is absolutely rock solid; yes, it has a learning curve, but once you master it, it's an extremely powerful OS
|
|
|
|
Nam Taf posted:alludes Yo u got ludes?
|
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 17, 2026 13:46 |
|
dlr posted:FreeBSD's ZFS support is second only to Solaris, IIRC. Linux lags behind a bit, it seems. Matthew Ahrens has stated that ZFS on FreeBSD is on par with Illumos/Solaris. OSX and Linux are far behind in stability and performance (not to mention loving weird bugs) Bob Morales posted:This cute little guy ![]() This is my little guy wooger posted:It's also an absolute nightmare if you're a new user and haven't learned that using a port for anything means that you can't use binary pkgs, and vice versa - unless you want to risk version dependency errors. This problem should hopefully be gone sometime this year. You should be able to install ports and packages and pkg will know when you've done this. When you "pkg upgrade" it will update all binary packages and automatically build any ports for you. wooger posted:Pkg on FreeBSD suffers from the binary packages only being re-compiled once every 2 weeks or so, which means it's always out of date with the ports tree. It's not clear why they can't just re-compile every time a port is updated. This is not true for quite a while. It's roughly every 48 hours, and should be faster if use the Quarterly branch (default on 10.0+). You can see the builds here: http://beefy1.nyi.freebsd.org http://beefy2.nyi.freebsd.org http://beefy3.nyi.freebsd.org http://beefy4.nyi.freebsd.org http://beefy5.nyi.freebsd.org http://beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org http://beefy7.nyi.freebsd.org http://beefy8.nyi.freebsd.org feld fucked around with this message at 22:32 on Feb 20, 2016 |
|
|

























he seems quite angry at BSD


