|
Sure
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 10:22 |
|
|
##prova
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2015 16:02
|
|
|
##rehersal
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2015 04:03
|
|
|
##vote Bifauxnen for captain lou albano
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2015 15:35
|
|
|
Outstanding.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2015 17:24
|
|
|
I can tell two things. 1. I'm going to need a print out of the rules to keep nearby. 2. I'm gonna want to use these rules more than once. Sir Sam Vimes for Pulcinella
|
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2015 05:35
|
|
|
vote Hal for IL DOTTORE
|
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2015 05:41
|
|
|
Exakt for capitano
|
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2015 09:45
|
|
|
I'm still struggling with the system a little, but both of these reactions are quite interesting.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2015 04:38
|
|
|
Aheh. Good for you.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2015 05:28
|
|
|
I'm not seeing a lot of scum hunting or much action outside of voting at all, really. I'm curious as to what makes me particularly scummy in your eyes.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2015 06:29
|
|
|
The capitanos meant to be building a case on me, so you should be explaining it to them, moreover, unless I'm confused (and that's possible) your role is to analyse what the capitano is saying. Which is tricky, because they're not saying a huge amount either. Certainly not exactly building a case. The fact that you're focusing on me instead of them is more suspicious than me not having much to say.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2015 06:32
|
|
|
The better people feel about voting Gwynplaine, the funnier it is.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2015 06:32
|
|
|
agreed, cavolo exakt
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2015 07:10
|
|
|
Aye, worth a shot SamVimes por Capitano
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2015 07:46
|
|
|
I am ##ready and for what it's worth I think Bif was mafia this time
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2015 08:12
|
|
|
How do you do my fellow townspeople? I'm sure we're all very excited. busb for capitano
|
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2015 05:36
|
|
|
Never not lynch day one.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2015 07:27
|
|
|
I'm gonna go back to the start. I'm already forgetting the rules. Gonna make notes.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2015 10:48
|
|
|
Vote krell for illest dottore
|
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2015 13:03
|
|
|
Am I being voted for being the devils advocate? Because I think I'd be okay at that.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2015 13:30
|
|
|
No one but no one gets accused of being scummy when they're innocent than ol' Gwyn. I know very well that appearing scummy and being scummy are very different.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2015 14:04
|
|
|
So the person i'm defending is exakts eventual target,right?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2015 02:30
|
|
|
MMM for the defense.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
busb posted:Jaccuse birdstrike for this post using faulty and misleading information during voting. In my clients defense, this game is off to a confusing start, with many people having misconceptions about it's rules and the implications of certain roles. Strike, much like myself reads by the page, not by the post. Generally a good technique. Good way to get a feel and work on instinct, which, on day one - is all we have. But it is fraught with peril in a game like this. I would argue that their lack of persistence and the poor quality of their argument means it is an honest mistake.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2015 04:20
|
|
|
Birdstrike is patently not scum. I wont rule out the possibility of him being a jester, but I think he'd have more subtlety.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2015 06:55
|
|
|
In the event that busb targets someone else, I am then to defend them, yes?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2015 07:17
|
|
|
Well it's difficult on day one. My current reading is that either both busb and strike are scum or neither are. I realize that s a pretty broad diagnosis but it IS day one and it is me.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2015 07:25
|
|
|
Going to work fairly soon, like an hour or so. We still have lots of time, yes?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2015 10:21
|
|
|
Oh man, Bif was scum during rehearsal? Stick with the kid, baby!
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 05:52
|
|
|
Birdstrike is above suspicion.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 06:20
|
|
|
It was a slow time. I was merely restating a fact.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 07:22
|
|
|
Birdstrike has been a vocal and dynamic member of this town. It is only logical in a game of this relative newness and with sufficient posting frequency that small mistakes would be made. Misunderstandings. Thats not scumstrike. Scumstrike repeatedly jokes in the early stages of the game about being openly scum as a double bluff. Almost faultlessly. Their actions in this game can be attributed to honest mistakes.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 07:28
|
|
|
I'm actually suspicious of Hal. Can't explain why. Day one, so it's largely meningless.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
Depends on the mistake. If I made it, then no.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 07:31
|
|
|
But seriously, it depends on the mistake. Accusing someone of something that an earlier post has since cleared up entirely. Sloppy, but acceptable -barely. Pushing a lynch on someone already dead. Really sloppy, but largely shows they're not paying attention. Which is generally only the luxury of town. Claiming data on someone you don't have. That's trouble.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 07:36
|
|
|
Busb and bird are on the same team. They just don't know it. That's the right sort of on the same team.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 09:54
|
|
|
On what grounds are you taking this perfectly justifiable and utterly not scummy under any circumstances action, Strike?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 12:06
|
|
|
What are we voting busb for?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 12:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 10:22 |
|
|
Can't only busb drop the hammer?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2015 12:18
|
|