|
Welcome once again to the USPOL thread! As we continue our trek into the second half of the year, we’re finally starting to see some fun creep into our political lives with Trump, Republican debates, budget battles and more! So cheers, and enjoy everything the thread has to offer, including an extra dose of presidential chat thanks to RSF! 114th Congress Bingo Card The 114th Congress is off this month (by law!) so there won’t be all that much coming out of Washington for a while (and next month’s OP will be pretty barebones to boot) but there’s still plenty to report on from this month before we take a break!
Other News, featuring the Clinton Corner Did you know that Hillary may be losing in key battleground states already? As we know, this is obviously indicative of how the general election will go, so I hope it is obvious why you should definitely not vote for Hillary! In other news…
Talk to other goons (why would you want to do that?) Remember that we have an IRC channel at synirc in #poligoon for livesteaming stuff. Goon Recommendations Documentaries
Talks Long pieces
Books
Twitter feeds
Related threads "US Politics" is an incredibly broad topic, as A) the country is freaking huge and B) given our role in international events pretty much everything impacts us. So there are other subthreads 2016 Presidential Primary 2016 US Senate Elections SCOTUS thread Right Wing Media There are also regional subthreads that are usually pretty slow, but sometimes cross-pollinate with this thread when something important is happening. Pacific Northwest Illinois Texas California There was a South thread, too, but it's been dead since last July. Lifted the rest of the above from FriedChicken. As before post suggestions for adding to the above and I'll edit them in if I see them. By the by, I don't have a clue what's the deal with my avatar. Some guy got pissy about gay marriage or something when the ruling came out and failed to make a good red text avatar apparently. And remember folks, drink chat goes in D&D chat thread. Drink responsibly. Your liver will thank you.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 08:00 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 09:11 |
|
Trump was like Christmas in July. What wonders does August hold for us? My hope is a blood sacrifice at the debate next week.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 08:13 |
|
Tuck Frump 2016 If we can get Palin on the ticket as his VP this will be the most entertaining election in history.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 08:16 |
|
Bring on the GOP debates. Sound the Gjallartrump.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 08:23 |
|
GOP-dor calls for aid! And Trump will answer!
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 08:35 |
|
Are there any laws in the US about having the word "gently caress" on a sign or other public display? There's clearly no problem with "fag", so... Gotta start printing "gently caress Huck" on t-shirts, they'd probably sell well.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 08:47 |
|
I was on vacation this week when the USOC pulled the Boston 2024 bid but I wanted to address this from the previous thread:ComradeCosmobot posted:1984 was the first Summer Olympics since 1932 to make a profit. Seoul, Barcelona, Atlanta, Beijing and London also reportedly made profits The IOC claims Sochi made $53m in profit. Sochi, the $50 billion profligate disaster olympics. Meanwhile, every olympics since 1960 has overrun its initial budget, by an average of 179%. Quickly - LA 84 ran a profit because they were the only bidder on the Olympics that year, and were able to tell the IOC to take it or leave it. They were the first Olympics to heavily sell broadcast rights. Now, the IOC owns the rights and gives host cities a ~10-15% cut. - Atlanta's "profit" is often cited at $10m, which when you count the entire budget, not just the OCOG budget, is a rate of return lower than a savings account. (yes, even with variable interest rates) - London crowed about how their Olympics came in £377m under budget...after the initial projections had been tripled to £9b - Mitt came in to run the SLC olympics after the previous board had been discovered to be rampantly corrupt. I was heavily involved in No Boston Olympics. We did a lot of research, so I can talk about this forever. Needless to say, we couldn't be happier with how it turned out. It was a real grassroots effort, not just from "ten people on twitter" like Marty Walsh said. Our support was bipartisan too, which you just don't see these days. We had Occupy Boston people and Tea Party people at the same meetings. Don't believe the lazy post-mortems about how the snow in February was responsible, or the ones that say it was the Mayor refusing to sign the taxpayer guarantee (Marty was the biggest Boston 2024 cheerleader since day 1. That press conference was a purely political 'you can't dump me I'm leaving you' move). It was on the ground activism and engagement putting pressure on Boston2024 to release their bid info and answer for their terrible decisions. It was lobbying with city and state level politicians to get them to see behind the veneer of ooo shiny happy Olympics.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 09:07 |
|
I literally don't care if it makes a profit. I don't want the Olympics in any American city. America has too much traffic. Let the rest of the world with their rickshaws and their flying machines, handle that poo poo.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 09:29 |
|
The Olympics has literally never generated revenue for the host city, and quite often has put them into significant amounts of debt and/or displaced a lot of businesses and people. They're a loving disaster unless you're competing or watching them on television. I live close enough to Boston that I would legitimately consider moving across the country if the Olympics had actually been accepted there because that would mean a straight decade of ludicrous traffic caused by tons of construction. Not in my loving backyard, the Big Dig was bad enough and I-93 construction ain't much better.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 09:51 |
|
Nonsense posted:I literally don't care if it makes a profit. I don't want the Olympics in any American city. America has too much traffic. Let the rest of the world with their rickshaws and their flying machines, handle that poo poo. On the plus side, being in Bejing may make china actually stick to it's pollution goals for the next 8 years. I got lucky the one time I went to Guangzhou and it was pretty clear; lately the visibility is measured in blocks. In direct economic impact to the US - if they haven't met their goals they'll shut down the country for a month beforehand, just like last time.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 10:01 |
|
The Shortest Path posted:The Olympics has literally never generated revenue for the host city, and quite often has put them into significant amounts of debt and/or displaced a lot of businesses and people. They're a loving disaster unless you're competing or watching them on television. Or in on the racket, be it via the organizing committee, the host city political class or the construction business. As a bonus you get to demolish some projects/slums and pave them over or turn them into luxury condos. I mean if it was a financial disaster for everyone no one would hold them. FIFA's only blunder was being too blatant about the World Cup. Qatar? Really? Russia and China you can clearly get away with.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 11:07 |
|
The Shortest Path posted:Are there any laws in the US about having the word "gently caress" on a sign or other public display? There's clearly no problem with "fag", so... Not really.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 11:34 |
|
http://www.dailydot.com/technology/kentucky-drone-shooting/quote:Where should we draw the line between the advancement of technology and the protection of personal privacy? For one Kentucky man, his property line is where he gets to make the call, and he made that point of view perfectly clear when he pointed his shotgun at a drone hovering in his backyard and pulled the trigger. Is this a legitimate use of weapons? Should Merideth have passively allowed his privacy to be violated because it's Wrong to defend himself and his family? As drones become more ubiquitous I think we'll see more and more incidents like this.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:00 |
|
RIP Roddy Piper, star of the most D&D movie.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:11 |
|
So many drone operators are bad and dumb. They have this brand new toy and think it gives them carte blanche to fly it anywhere they please - even if that means preventing firefighting helicopters from getting where they need to go, or buzzing in the background of the field show I was at last night. poo poo needs to get regulated quick.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:24 |
|
Pope Guilty posted:RIP Roddy Piper, star of the most D&D movie. Yes, Hell Comes To Frogtown has a lot to say about the feeling of emasculation of the white male in the presence of increasing female empowerment. Also, frogs.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:25 |
|
Brannock posted:http://www.dailydot.com/technology/kentucky-drone-shooting/ Some idiot nearly crashed their drone into a jet at JFK yesterday so I hope someone figures out something to do with them.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:26 |
Brannock posted:http://www.dailydot.com/technology/kentucky-drone-shooting/ Interesting quirk to the story: the guy selected the birdshot instead of a .22 rifle so he wouldn't endanger anyone who might happen to be where it fell. Imo assuming the description of it hovering right over his property (as opposed to say 500ft up) is correct then peeping tom deserved to have his $1.8k toy blown out of the sky
|
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:27 |
|
Gizmodo had an article on it, and drones are legally considered to be aircraft--so he might be in a heap of trouble for shooting it down per FAA regs.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:34 |
|
LeeMajors posted:Gizmodo had an article on it, and drones are legally considered to be aircraft--so he might be in a heap of trouble for shooting it down per FAA regs. That would be absolutely idiotic and I'd be sad if he got hit for defending his daughter before they change the laws. One thing I'd like see is a prohibition on using drones for advertising. God knows we already have enough marketing garbage shoved into every aspect of our societal spaces.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:48 |
|
Brannock posted:That would be absolutely idiotic and I'd be sad if he got hit for defending his daughter before they change the laws. The guy released the flight data log for the drone. It was at 250 feet altitude the whole time, neighbor is likely not only a lying sack of poo poo, but opened fire at a legally flying craft at legal altitude. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ontent=20150801
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:50 |
|
CommieGIR posted:The guy released the flight data log for the drone. It was at 250 feet altitude the whole time, neighbor is likely not only a lying sack of poo poo, but opened fire at a legally flying craft at legal altitude. Probably why he was arrested.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:52 |
|
The Shortest Path posted:Tuck Frump 2016 Not sure if the American populace has the cognitive ability to realize these two are complete morons who shouldn't be allowed to campaign for a new ice cream flavor, much less President and veep.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:54 |
|
I have a hard time being sympathetic to the drone operator for hanging out in someone's backyard and possibly peeking.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:02 |
|
Raenir Salazar posted:I have a hard time being sympathetic to the drone operator for hanging out in someone's backyard and possibly peeking. I guess we should legalize shooting down Cessnas then. 250 feet is well above the legal limit for drone airspace, and does not mesh with the story the neighbor is claiming. Either you pretend that he was okay with him shooting down a legally flying aircraft within its legal airspace backed by flight records, or you buy the crazy neighbors story who was likely just itching to shoot something out of the air.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:05 |
|
CommieGIR posted:I guess we should legalize shooting down Cessnas then. Legal! LEGAL!!! Is there an actual good reason drones should be considered actual aircraft?
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:07 |
|
Brannock posted:
You mean besides the obvious?
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:12 |
|
Brannock posted:
Well if you want the FAA to regulate it.... ...Yes?
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:12 |
|
Brannock posted:
Like it or not those are the laws and it is a legal matter. There's definitely a conversation to be had about updating the laws or some laws being for sale to the highest bidder through the "democratic" process, but for this case he had his drone in the legal air space.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:15 |
|
Up to twenty years in federal prison for shooting down a toy helicopter and people are going "Well that's the law so we should be okay with it". Embarrassing. I hope you remember this a decade from now when drones polluting our airspace and shoving even more advertising and surveillance into our lives is just more background noise that people are crazy nutters for disliking.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:24 |
|
Brannock posted:
They fly through the air, and are craft. The actual problem here is that flying the drone over private property for the purpose of taking pictures may be a civil trespass. You can't respond to a civil trespass by destroying the equipment, though. If someone sets up a camera on your property to film you, you can sue the hell out of them, but you can't just destroy the property. Simplistically, people think they have a right to destroy anything on their property but tort law really frowns on that sort of vigilantism. We need some new laws to penalize the use of drones over private property--their nature of low-flyingness makes them a hazard, beyond the privacy concerns. Brannock posted:Up to twenty years in federal prison for shooting down a toy helicopter and people are going "Well that's the law so we should be okay with it". Embarrassing. He's not going to get 20 years for it, calm down. The appropriate thing to do is to call for laws regulating drones, not to say that people should just shoot them down on their own.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:25 |
|
CommieGIR posted:The guy released the flight data log for the drone. It was at 250 feet altitude the whole time, neighbor is likely not only a lying sack of poo poo, but opened fire at a legally flying craft at legal altitude. Flight logs that can be doctored, and 250 feet sounds pretty far for birdshot. So really this proves nothing.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:32 |
|
El Disco posted:Flight logs that can be doctored, and 250 feet sounds pretty far for birdshot. So really this proves nothing. Is this a joke post, or did you not take 3 seconds to check Google for birdshot ranges first? Because I'm seeing anywhere from 100-250 yards depending on type, and 250 feet is sub-90 yards.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:38 |
|
Also he shot a loving gun off in the middle of a suburb, he should have been brought in for that alone.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:40 |
|
Obdicut posted:You can't respond to a civil trespass by destroying the equipment, though. It's remote operated and hundreds of feet in the air. What other responses were available to him? Eta: not being snarky, I find this legitimately an interesting conversation.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:40 |
|
Mo_Steel posted:Is this a joke post, or did you not take 3 seconds to check Google for birdshot ranges first? Because I'm seeing anywhere from 100-250 yards depending on type, and 250 feet is sub-90 yards. And it doesn't take much to knock out a drone. The rotors are meant to bend then break off in case of collision, so a birdshot pellet hitting one is going to tear it up. I'm not sure about the flight tracking data. There was discussion of it in the NPR comments, if it has it's own video feed, then the telemetry data would probably be baked into the metadata of the video like timestamps and backed-up on the operator's end. Modus Pwnens posted:It's remote operated and hundreds of feet in the air. What other responses were available to him? I'm sure that using a laser against a drone would be a completely appropriate response, although I'm not sure if that would fall under the same FAA restrictions as using it against manned aircraft.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:43 |
|
Obdicut posted:The actual problem here is that flying the drone over private property for the purpose of taking pictures may be a civil trespass. I am hella uncomfortable that that's considered a "may" and not a "is"
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:44 |
|
Nonsense posted:I literally don't care if it makes a profit. I don't want the Olympics in any American city. Bring up all the other horrible stuff that comes with the Olympics and boosters would say "but this is AMERICA. That won't happen HERE." I was at a community meeting where someone asked about what Boston 2024 would do to prevent human trafficking around the games. They got booed and Boston 2024 said "that's not our problem. Human trafficking happens in China, not in Boston." Harik posted:On the plus side, being in Bejing may make china actually stick to it's pollution goals for the next 8 years. I got lucky the one time I went to Guangzhou and it was pretty clear; lately the visibility is measured in blocks.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:44 |
|
Modus Pwnens posted:It's remote operated and hundreds of feet in the air. What other responses were available to him? Would this apply if he put a camera up on top of a pole? Because firing a shotgun at someone elses property with the capacity to accidentally injure other people or destroy other property as a result is the sort of thing that I think ought to only be allowed in situations of immediate harm.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:46 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 09:11 |
|
Mo_Steel posted:Is this a joke post, or did you not take 3 seconds to check Google for birdshot ranges first? Because I'm seeing anywhere from 100-250 yards depending on type, and 250 feet is sub-90 yards. .22 birdshot effective range is about 120 feet, but that doesn't mean you can't hit stuff beyond that, just that there's a fall-off in power. It depends on a lot of other variables in the shotgun like the choke and the shot being used. mandatory lesbian posted:I am hella uncomfortable that that's considered a "may" and not a "is" Depends on state laws. It's not a federal thing, it's a state-by-state thing. Do you also think that taking pictures onto someone else's property from a nearby height is a problem? like, if you are up on a hillside and take a picture down at a house below you should that be a civil violation? Modus Pwnens posted:It's remote operated and hundreds of feet in the air. What other responses were available to him? Calling the cops, taking pictures of it. The worst case scenario of it falling out of the sky after being shot is that it hits someone. There's also another irony here: if he was actually shooting it at the height he was saying he was, that's a really unsafe discharge--he was firing at a flat parabolic arc. If he was firing it at the height the drone guy says it was then it's a harmless (other than for the drone) discharge. Obdicut fucked around with this message at 16:12 on Aug 1, 2015 |
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:48 |