|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 00:02 |
|
|
And now is the time we sing along at home. "Oh, Canada, our home and native land..."
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
Tighclops posted:The only person to kick any serious rear end in this debate is the only one that hasn't a shot in hell at winning any real power, ever. Also she is usually nuts too 
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
Catch you guys in the morning, I'm going to either dream about Sexy Justin or have nightmares of Terminator Harper
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
Does every country call itself the greatest in the world, or is it just the US and the US-wannabes we have to politicians in Canada?
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
Night all!
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
bunnyofdoom posted:Night all! good night bun bun
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
missed the whole drat thing. Sounds like Mulcair was pretty quiet the whole time, were there any overt attacks on him/ndp policy?
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
JawKnee posted:missed the whole drat thing. Sounds like Mulcair was pretty quiet the whole time, were there any overt attacks on him/ndp policy? Oh, plenty from the other leaders, but he's been quiet. Unusually so.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 03:04
|
|
|
yeah, trudeau and may both went after the ndp on a couple of occasions.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
Just saw this.... hahaha
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 05:19
|
|
|
oh good, they fixed it. the first one wasn't spell checked:
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 05:29
|
|
|
Lars Blitzer posted:And now is the time we sing along at home. "Oh, Canada, our home and native land..." I misread "native" there as "naïve" and wondered why that seemed so appropriate right now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 07:07
|
|
|
PlaceholderPigeon posted:
Sorry for the ultra late reply but I had to dash out mid-debate. I'm under the impression that the NDP's policy on the clairity act is more popular in Quebec, than others. (which is why they have the most amount of seats) I live in BC tho and get basically no Quebec news so I'd be happy to have a Quebecer tell me how it really is.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 07:18
|
|
|
Femtosecond posted:I'm under the impression that the NDP's policy on the clairity act is more popular in Quebec, than others. (which is why they have the most amount of seats) Trudeau tried to attack Mulcair for in the past having mentioned a 50%+1 vote for Quebec separation. Mulcair responded with "Fine, what is the number for you?" trying to get Trudeau to take a stance on the issue. Trudeau tried over and over to get out of it, which lead to Mulcair asking him "So what is YOUR number?" over and over as Trudeau pretends it wasn't happening.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 08:03
|
|
|
Watched the replay of the debate after I finally got home. I dunno I kinda liked Trudeau's closing statements. Certainly better than Mulcair's mangled ones. Honestly given his great performance in Question Period I was expecting a lot more from Mulcair.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 08:10
|
|
|
Femtosecond posted:Sorry for the ultra late reply but I had to dash out mid-debate. I've never had non-politics people talk to me about the Clarity Act but the general idea of "fed won't intervene in Quebec's decisions" probably gets a positive response.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 08:22
|
|
|
less than three posted:Trudeau tried to attack Mulcair for in the past having mentioned a 50%+1 vote for Quebec separation. "What's my number? Nine. Nine Supreme Court Justices" was a pretty killer response, I thought.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 13:26
|
|
|
He started off saying it really weak and whiny, when he said 9, and then he managed to turn it around to be a decent comeback. The whole subject is loving retarded though
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 14:14
|
|
|
JohnnyCanuck posted:"What's my number? Nine. Nine Supreme Court Justices" was a pretty killer response, I thought. Really? Mulcair's question is pretty on point. Trudeau went out of his way to criticize the 50+1 standard, so a very reasonable response is: "Okay, you brought up the subject. What is a reasonable threshold of support for full sovereignty?" Coming back with, "Well, I'll leave that to the Supreme Court" is a pretty weak dodge. Besides, Mulcair made a good positive point later in the debate. If you don't have a clear dividing line between a successful and unsuccessful referendum on sovereignty, you risk encouraging Yes votes as a kind of dissatisfaction vote. There needs to be a clear threshold, so people understand that if this thing passes (what does that mean if you leave the idea vague and punt it to the Supreme Court?), this is what will come of it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 15:41
|
|
|
PhilippAchtel posted:Really? Mulcair's question is pretty on point. Trudeau went out of his way to criticize the 50+1 standard, so a very reasonable response is: "Okay, you brought up the subject. What is a reasonable threshold of support for full sovereignty?" Coming back with, "Well, I'll leave that to the Supreme Court" is a pretty weak dodge. I agree that was a good point, but it requires some reflection to understand instead of "you want quebec to separate?! "
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 16:45
|
|
|
JohnnyCanuck posted:"What's my number? Nine. Nine Supreme Court Justices" was a pretty killer response, I thought. Yeah, one of Trudeau's few good moments in the debate I thought. Mulcair looked pretty dumb trying to heckle Trudeau on that file.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
Helsing posted:Yeah, one of Trudeau's few good moments in the debate I thought. Mulcair looked pretty dumb trying to heckle Trudeau on that file. Contrast that with his closing remarks  I don't get Trudeau.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2015 18:04
|
|
|
CLAM DOWN posted:Contrast that with his closing remarks It could be that he's being carefully handled by party brass and is actually better off when they just let him be himself. I'm talking out of my rear end though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
Heavy neutrino posted:Designated Driver's drinking game: chug when someone talks about poverty I'm happy to say that I stayed almost perfectly sober last night -- I drank when EMay said that Orwell's fair elections act takes away the right to vote from the homeless.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2015 02:03
|
|
|
http://imgur.com/8THSx2S
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2015 04:09
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2015 06:32
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2015 10:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 00:02 |
|
|
If someone can make this so that it cuts off the first part and is just a loop of Harper shaking his head in wonder... I would make it my av But only if someone does all the leg work 
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2015 13:49
|
|