|
Intel raid is basically a software implementation in UEFI/BIOS instead of the OS. There's no dedicated processor/ram like at LSI card and all the workload is sent to the shared resources, similar to the old WinTel software modems that became popular. Nothing necessarily wrong with it, but its not hardware raid. The Intel software will only work with their arrays, all the vendors to my knowledge do their own proprietary thing for drivers and controlling software. Intel does make some hardware raid controllers but that's all for server class hardware. Not sure if RST would know what to do with those, probably a separate software package.
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2017 17:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 15:24 |
|
|
repiv posted:I'm the people who are terrified of Microsoft telemetry yet willing to install unvetted kernel code from some random internet person. Please reboot in unsigned kernel driver mode to install our Maximum Security Software
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
djssniper posted:That's just SMB 1 though right? our sys admin shut that off on our server a few weeks back when that appeared, which screwed our ricoh scanner as it only used that protocol to save I think the key is being able to get files remotely on to another system where the indexer will parse them. SMB version doesn't matter here.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
redeyes posted:You see, every business has an entire IT department complete with test rigs and a dev environment. If its important they would. If its not, then the risk is on them so: tough poo poo.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2017 21:49
|
|
|
Medullah posted:Something is causing my PC to stutter and slow down every once in a while. It's super sporadic and driving me nuts, I can't figure out what is causing it.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2017 22:34
|
|
|
Zero VGS posted:Also, this is the reason your wifi blew up on the Oct 10th patch: The worlds most advanced operating system looking out for your best interests yet again.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2017 20:45
|
|
|
Its under the Configure Automatic Updates policy, checkbox at the bottom.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2017 21:49
|
|
|
AlternateAccount posted:FWIW, after a lot of digging around, it turns out the WINDOWS ANTIMALWARE SERVICE was just ruining my disk constantly. It runs background scans on the disk that are scheduled, but it should be running that IO as low priority and causing minimal impact to user interactive processes.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 6, 2017 16:45
|
|
|
nielsm posted:So far the differentiation has only been licensing for multi-CPU-socket machines and huge amounts of RAM, as far as I know? Just a couple "server features" added to a "desktop" SKU. You get SMB-Direct as well, that was Server only until now.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 6, 2017 22:01
|
|
|
Mr Crucial posted:Has anyone else come across this issue: a brand new install of Win10 1709 in a VM. However, most of the trusted root certificates for the internet are missing, so that almost every site on the web gives me a certificate error with an untrusted root CA as the issue. This even includes Microsoft's own website rear end well as Google and Mozilla, so I can't download Chrome or Firefox to try and get around this. Root CAs come through an automatic routine that runs daily or Windows Update failing that. The root trusts ship pre-loaded regardless. Neither of those would function if your trusts were wiped out. Either your image is tampered with or something else that was installed wiped it out post-install.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
Ihmemies posted:Turns out that Microsoft is poo poo, as was expected. Disabling that Drives come with a bunch of remap sectors that will be consumed before a chkdsk shows anything. You need something that will check SMART stats for the drive to see if its remapping (failing) or look through the event log to see if there is an indicator of disk access errors.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2017 15:14
|
|
-assisted poo poo from defender settings stopped the head seeking and the HDD is actually fine.
|
Fragmentation kills throughput because the data layout isn't working with the disk geometry, you're talking about a couple extra ms as the head jumps to a new location on the platter compounded over thousands of operations. It's not enough to cause full-on stalls which are more often a symptom hardware issues but it will negatively impact performance.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2017 19:17
|
|
|
djssniper posted:https://support.symantec.com/en_US/article.TECH247287.html That's just the system tray hotkey poller, not the driver itself. Won't stop sounds from working.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
Arivia posted:System Builder licenses were equivalent to OEM licenses, just for small mom and pop shops. That’s not a full license and is tied to the hardware it was bought with. EU laws allow those to be transferrable which is why they always seem to come out of there. No idea if licenses imported to the US will actually hold up though.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
To answer your question, no. Batch scripts to do not have a native way of sleeping for a specified interval. The wait/sleep command was part of a resource kit thing that distributed with 2003 but was optional. Pings default to 1s interval and the typical solution is to ping localhost -n [x] for however many seconds you need.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2017 15:21
|
|
|
Is Dell still using BTX? They were on that for quite a while while everybody else gave up on it and I thought that was why the connector was different.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2017 19:21
|
|
|
GRINDCORE MEGGIDO posted:Shame btx never caught on. That's a pimp case too. The layout redesign of BTX assumed the memory controller was going to stay on the Northbridge. When it moved on to the CPU die, it freed up a lot of space to work with and the needs it was accommodating sorta became irrelevant. But yeah, I miss it. At least OEM ATX case designs got better after the BTX shakeup. gently caress those clamshell Dells
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2017 16:17
|
|
|
GRINDCORE MEGGIDO posted:I have an old Lian Li V1000 like that. It's a shame it doesn't fit decent length modern PSU's, or I'd still be using it. I just cut that one bracket out of the middle and modern ones fit ok
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2017 03:28
|
|
|
GRINDCORE MEGGIDO posted:I should get some snips and a fine file and do that. Are you using that case now? Yeah, I love it and will go through any necessary nonsense to keep it running when I upgrade from this 2500k
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2017 14:52
|
|
|
Paul MaudDib posted:Would it be an easier fix to virtualize a W10 instance on my fileserver that could serve stuff on the local network via the normal mechanism? Anything in particular I would have to do to make it visible, apart from the usual Windows Update settings? Why not just use the P2P update topology that's already built in to the OS? The inbound files should be staggered enough that you won't get the same content pulling down at the same time unless manually triggering updates at the same time on each system. If you're dead-set on it, you can point your Pro clients at the WSUS mirror through a local policy without domain enrolling them. But you're still probably in CAL-HELL at that point. BangersInMyKnickers fucked around with this message at 16:28 on Dec 18, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2017 16:26
|
|
|
Avenging Dentist posted:What's the current best practice for splitting some of Windows' system folders across disks? I want the OS on C:\ (an SSD, of course), but user accounts on E:\ (an HDD). I'd like programs to go on either drive (stuff I use a lot on C:\ and less-used stuff on E:\), but I think that should be easy enough by just specifying the install location for each program in its wizard. After searching for docs on how to do this, I found that there are lots of good ways to gently caress up your computer if you do this wrong, hence this post. If this is a single-user system, repoint specific folders like Downloads/Music/Videos to that other drive but don't attempt to repoint C:\Users it is a lesson in pain
|
|
#
¿
Dec 27, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
Digirat posted:Does windows 10 not list security updates in its update history? I kept automatic updates delayed as much as possible but just manually updated, and windows update now says I'm up to date. However I'm not seeing any recent security updates there except an old flash player one. the meltdown/spectre updates are not there. This was technical a new build and yeah it doesn't consistently list in the windows update history. You can see it in the legacy "installed updates" view in the control panel.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2018 22:34
|
|
|
astral posted:What? I'm still on regular CU but Might be an SCCM thing in my case, but that same view does not list the KB on my test VM despite having the patch. Legacy control panel lists it.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2018 23:07
|
|
|
If I remember right I had to strip out all the bundled Appx stuff before sysprep would run correctly, but that was back on 1511 or something and I figured it would be fixed by now.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2018 03:29
|
|
|
It's probably still an AV conflict. What's your Win10 build number? e: Might also be a warning that your BIOS doesn't mitigate spectre if MS is getting clever.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2018 18:25
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:How do you view a stoplog in Windows 10? Or more to the point how do I find out what caused my system to crash so badly it had to restart Give this a shot: http://www.osronline.com/page.cfm?name=Analyze If its a full dump and not a mini dump then you'll probably need to zip it. Hopefully its under the file size limit.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2018 18:53
|
|
|
Check if your build number is 16299.192 or if KB4056892 is installed.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2018 22:31
|
|
|
PUBLIC TOILET posted:Nope and nope. I'm on 16299.19 and that KB is not installed. Tried to manually install and no go. You can manually download the KB off the MS catalog site. Give that a shot https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Home.aspx
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2018 15:40
|
|
|
No, MS is still rolling the KB it's hardware vendors that are withdrawing the BIOS/microcode update because of compatibility issues with some processors.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2018 19:31
|
|
|
Hulebr00670065006e posted:Thx for the info guys. Worked like a charm. My storage drive is still MBR though, does it matter? It's using the old partitioning style with a limit of 4 primary partitions and then however many extended inside of those (probably doesn't matter for you). I believe secure boot requires GPT and that's a good feature that you should be using now that you're in UEFI mode. There are some free tools to convert an MBR disk to GPT, I don't think windows can do it natively. https://www.easeus.com/partition-master/convert-mbr-to-gpt-during-windows-installation.html
|
|
#
¿
Jan 26, 2018 16:21
|
|
|
Eletriarnation posted:It can. In Disk Management, gotten to by right-clicking This PC and choosing Manage: Ah, I thought it was the OS drive. Yeah just convert it on the fly in disk manager.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 26, 2018 17:30
|
|
|
Correct, the pin unlocks the TPM which releases the drive encryption key. If you are using pre-boot protection then other mechanisms like firmware/bootloader/whatever fingerprints are also checked before/in place of the pin.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2018 02:40
|
|
|
Truga posted:I remember about a decade ago I worked at a java shop that switched to nod32, and nod32 insisted on extracting and scanning every single jar file every time it got accessed. Your IT people deployed it wrong. It fingerprints files and only scans them once unless they have changed or the definitions changed. That's standard behavior for pretty much any AV these days.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2018 17:37
|
|
|
CubanMissile posted:I fail to understand the benefits of "S Mode" and why Microsoft seems to think users will prefer it. I could see it appealing to schools. Windows biggest liability is its ability to run arbitrary code without any appreciable kind of sandboxing or containerization, S solves most of that. You then have to content that you've basically created an iPad at that point so you're going to need to fight with Apple there on price point and features but I can see some kind of market for it.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2018 17:42
|
|
|
Microsoft pushing S-mode and their app platform before they give devs an easy way to migrate existing codebases written in obj-c is going to yet again doom it to obscurity
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2018 17:44
|
|
|
Ruflux posted:Ah, the good old days of playing Perfect Dark with Project64 on a school computer with an awful mouse and keyboard. I'd say taking that away from kids is a crime but then again even my shithole school had locked down their PCs pretty well by that time (I just found a stash of goodies installed locally) and it's not like kids these days give a gently caress about computers or Nintendo 64 games, so I have to agree, S Mode makes perfect sense for schools. Unfortunately I'm pretty sure most educational software is still from like the 90s or something so that'll likely be a problem. RemoteApp stuff and two Remote Desktop Services servers will get all that stuff running without a huge amount of fuss or expense assuming your infrastructure can support it. Even marginally lovely wifi should be able to handle it now that they've optimized the RDP protocols with RemoteFX and h.264 support.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2018 22:55
|
|
|
Camtasia is good https://www.techsmith.com/video-editor.html
|
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2018 18:24
|
|
|
Palladium posted:I like how I explicitly disabled automatic driver updates and Win 10 still prompts me to install them anyway because reasons. Driver updates can have security content and may be packaged as so, would probably override that setting
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2018 17:47
|
|
|
Mr Shiny Pants posted:This is awesome for desktops, you just put it in hibernation and it does not consume any power whatsoever. A desktop in hibernate will consume pretty much the same amount of power as one in sleep S3
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2018 17:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 15:24 |
|
|
isndl posted:I mean, S3 is still very low power usage because most of the hardware is shut down, but it's still more than zero. Get a plug meter and look at what its consuming in S4 or S5. Depending on the mobo config it will read 0-3W which will mean fuckall to your power bill and s3 will be 1-3W.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2018 22:40
|
|
