|
 EDIT: 
Tricky D fucked around with this message at 21:59 on Aug 11, 2015 |
#
?
Aug 11, 2015 21:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 06:33 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 11, 2015 21:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 11, 2015 21:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 03:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 03:42
|
|
|
  I'm trying to figure out if that second one is balanced. On one hand, if you have 7 Republicans, it's 4 mana 1/2, which is garbage. On the other hand, you only have 2 Republicans, it's a 9 mana 6/7, which seems... pretty good? idk. And in the middle, if you have like 4 Republicans, it's a 7 mana 4/5, which is pretty mediocre for the cost. I like the concept, but it seems hard to make good. e: but it would be the best bling-o-tron pull in the whole world, no doubt quadrophrenic fucked around with this message at 03:50 on Aug 12, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 03:48
|
|
|
wtf is this jewel pretty princess garbage
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:wtf is this jewel pretty princess garbage i'm not about to make a separate hearthstone election thread, let me have my fun
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 03:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 05:08
|
|
|
quadrophrenic posted:
9 mana for a 6/7 is not good because it sits in your hand for the entire game and does nothing when it enters the battlefield. but don't worry about making cards that are balanced or good
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 05:49
|
|
|
stoutfish posted:9 mana for a 6/7 is not good because it sits in your hand for the entire game and does nothing when it enters the battlefield. tbf, it's a weapon, so it does 6 damage when it enters the battlefield. maybe on turn 9 weapons in general are not very useful because the only thing worth hitting will hit the face hard, and there's usually enough taunt/soft taunt on the board to make going directly to face unreasonable and I know a lot of these cards are goofy but unplayable, but i find making goofy but playable cards a fun challenge
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 05:55
|
|
|
You do the lords work.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 07:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 08:48
|
|
|
 e: alternate 
super sweet best pal fucked around with this message at 09:39 on Aug 12, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 09:15
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 09:28
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 10:38
|
|
|
Why is the Red Scare an artifact and who is the arbiter of what is a beneficial ability Also why is it from the quasi-Greek plane of Theros
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 10:43
|
|
|
Nehru the Damaja posted:Why is the Red Scare an artifact and who is the arbiter of what is a beneficial ability 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 10:48
|
|
|
It's an artifact from the 1950s of course. I just went with the symbol that looked the most like the hammer and sickle.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 10:48
|
|
|
We can only hope for a reprint of this classic:
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 12:57
|
|
|
now i genuinely want to play a us politics card game
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 17:24
|
|
|
I'm more familiar with Shandalar-era cards than modern, but let's see.    
delfin fucked around with this message at 19:00 on Aug 12, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 17:55
|
|
|
Sheng-ji Yang posted:now i genuinely want to play a us politics card game I don't know anything about balancing a magic expansion, but there's been plenty of 'reasonable' ideas for an unglued style set. EDIT: http://www.mtgsalvation.com/articles/16051-putting-your-eggs-in-your-basket-designing-a According to this guy: 306 cards, 42 white, 42 blue, 42 black, 42 red, 42 green, 18 artifact, 38 multicolor, 20 land, 20 basic land. Most of these cards are reasonable enough that you could have a fairly entertaining game out of it. Full Battle Rattle fucked around with this message at 18:25 on Aug 12, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 18:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 18:45
|
|
|
Strip Mine the State of Israel.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 18:51
|
|
|
The State of Israel should just be a land card.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:The State of Israel should just be a land card. It should be an enchantment that let's you take control of your opponent's lands.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
Chamale posted:It should be an enchantment that let's you take control of your opponent's lands. That would be the active ability of the IDF creature card.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
AIPAC: Interrupt 1WB Counter target spell and target taps all non-white lands.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 19:53
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 20:06
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:AIPAC: Interrupt 1WB 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 20:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 20:19
|
|
|
Chamale posted:It should be an enchantment that let's you take control of your opponent's lands. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 20:25
|
|
|
 
A Winner is Jew fucked around with this message at 21:43 on Aug 12, 2015 |
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 21:15
|
|
|
    
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 21:15
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2015 22:11
|
|
|
Trans Am Trans Am
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2015 01:06
|
|
|
yase
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:yase we need some good regular creatures  here's a version without the tooltip on it because i'm a dummy Here, have another, I'll trade you 
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2015 07:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 06:33 |
|
|
Why do people keep making Republican's black? Republicans are very obviously White/Red, with Democrats are predominantly blue with a smattering of other colours in their rainbow deck. Also, 
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2015 17:34
|
|
