|
Confirmed
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2015 02:37 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 22:11 |
|
It's our coupling, from fan fiction mafia
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2015 03:03 |
|
Carpet shark drew it before joining sa mafia
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2015 03:04 |
|
Met posted:So are EXALT or Aliens the bad guys here? ##vote met
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2015 04:36 |
|
Met, you *were* scum that game
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2015 04:54 |
|
It was meant to acknowledge a less savory interaction between the two of us. Met at that point tried to question my suspicion of and argument against him the same way, and he was scum. The situation escalated from there and that's all that really needs to be said.
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2015 05:04 |
|
I think you're parsing that incorrectly Sagan Also good to see you again
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2015 05:31 |
|
When I read it first, I got the impression that it was X as scum along with a third party group separate from X Perhaps it's just what I believe so I'm ready to see it
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2015 05:34 |
|
It reads as false chill to me I sometimes use the tactic
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2015 07:49 |
|
I mean, it ought to be clear how I feel. I think it's a scum/3p slip and I don't like the way he responded to it. It's not an airtight multipost case but so it goes, it's D1.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2015 00:14 |
|
TMMadman posted:My problem right now is that the 'slip' would mean that Met is either completely brain dead or completely brazen enough to reveal that he is a 3rd party in basically his very first post. And I just don't buy that he is either of those things. Now I want to see met's flip to see how much of a bus this is lol
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2015 02:34 |
|
lol
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2015 03:08 |
|
Content kvetching d1 is bad
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2015 19:35 |
|
TMMadman posted:And yet you kept telling me I was rolefishing in the Restrictive Diet game. Lol really
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2015 23:43 |
|
You've slowly pushed the narrative where you now are stating only an utterly terrible player could possibly make a slip. Don't think it's gone unnoticed because it's gradual
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2015 00:11 |
|
Agreed op, if you keep saying it loudly enough maybe it'll drown out the fact met had been scummy af since the first vote
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2015 00:17 |
|
I'm not moving my vote because of how he carried it
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2015 00:47 |
|
##vote madman
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2015 06:09 |
|
Oh, I totally misread my copy of the setup, sorry
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2015 06:19 |
|
I've been busy tbh and d1
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2015 06:35 |
|
I'm following met's logic along with my own suspicions as to the nature and direction of madman's defense over the past game day
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2015 17:53 |
|
TMMadman posted:You mean my defense of an innocent townie? Which for some reason would supposedly give me town cred if I was scum? Nobody has clearly explained that part to me. If I'm scum, why would I bother to draw so many eyes towards me by trying to defend someone who was in the red zone for the majority of D1?
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2015 18:29 |
|
I'm literally the first post after that post How could that parrot popular opinion If anything it would be establishing a trend
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2015 01:36 |
|
Oh I dig I haven't really read today that closely As for 3p/scum it makes sense for motivations and potential mechanics slips but yeah idk
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2015 02:18 |
|
It ain't gonna happen, babe.
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2015 05:16 |
|
you don't have a case to rest
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2015 05:25 |
|
anyway horse just tipped his hand, vimes/horse/madman scum team
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2015 05:27 |
|
If I get to -5 I'll make sure to claim my role that would make townies hesitant to hammer me too
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2015 05:29 |
|
I volunteer to do something that is a foregone conclusion anyway, but when we get there I'll still want to talk as much as possible until someone says it's more advantageous to no-lynch rather than mislynch a townie and I'll welcome that with open arms
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2015 05:33 |
|
I'll start playing more seriously as we approach deadline tbh
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2015 19:14 |
|
TMMadman posted:I'm going to swing back to this post and just flat out say that I hate it. What the hell kind of bullshit is this? Why only play seriously as the deadline approaches? Why even bother coming in and saying this? This is just pure loving garbage. you know what's worse than a disengaged town advocating lynching someone you recognize as likely disengaged town over viable scum candidates I'm sorry I have other things to do!
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2015 02:14 |
|
If you actually thought I was scum, you wouldn't have forgotten about me for the majority of your day's posting
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2015 02:32 |
|
TMMadman posted:What? I haven't forgotten about you. My vote is already on you and you haven't been posting poo poo. You've been slobbering all over hoping someone takes you seriously on one of your tenuous cases SirSamVimes posted:You have said literally nothing of substance since I made my post, so I have nothing more to say. I wasn't talking to you, don't be so self-important op
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2015 02:39 |
|
Assault Rifle
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2015 02:43 |
|
Kashuno posted:Is that your final answer yes TMMadman posted:Except that I am following SSVs case on you right now and not one of my own. So clearly you aren't really reading the thread. lol
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2015 02:47 |
|
Evil Sagan posted:##shoot Horsebanger what why no ugh
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2015 03:12 |
|
Horsebanger posted:
Don't sweat it dude Hope to see you again!
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2015 05:18 |
|
Somberbrero posted:guys can we not give out role information for no loving reason? Scum objection spotted
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2015 05:28 |
|
Sagan clearly isn't scum, I view any votes on him as an affront on logic Vimes and madman most likely are both unless they're just illogical hyper players The last scum is probably someone like Winson or KB
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2015 17:51 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 22:11 |
|
TMMadman posted:You know why else bothers me about this post? The first sentence. "why are you commenting on something that's become a recurring narrative as if the game will continue past this very instant"
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2015 18:30 |