|
Splatmaster posted:I can very easily see someone in the not too distant future watching it for the first time and saying "hey, mom- that was recorded 2d on location in space, right?" haha |
# ? Sep 9, 2015 22:13 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 06:12 |
stanley kubrick in fact WAS hired to fake a moon landing, however, he insisted on doing by actually filming it on the moon. it ranks as one of his lesser works due to a weak script, i mean the only good line was used in every trailer
---------------- |
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 22:56 |
|
precision posted:stanley kubrick in fact WAS hired to fake a moon landing, however, he insisted on doing by actually filming it on the moon. it ranks as one of his lesser works due to a weak script, i mean the only good line was used in every trailer It was already the 11th in the series, and only served to spawn 6 other less than noteworthy sequels I must create a system or be enslaved by another mans; I will not reason and compare: my business is to create. - William Blake |
# ? Sep 9, 2015 22:59 |
i used to be a projectionist back when we had physical film (real), and there was a huge amount of downtime. the boys who worked the other shifts had a gym up there and worked out. me? I took the reels labeled to be sent to the second run theater, and spliced them together to make it seem like the characters from different movies were talking to each other, then I'd send them out. eventually my theater went out of business because everyone went to see the spliced films.
Qwerinty fucked around with this message at 00:02 on Sep 10, 2015 ---------------- |
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:10 |
|
alnilam posted:And yet exactly this is one of the neatest aspects of 2001. HAL is absolutely the only character with any, uh, humanity. All of the living humans are flat, cold, and professional. HAL shows curiosity, embarrassment, interest in the well being of his crew (for a time at least), and fear of death. True, but this was by design -- Dave Bowman and his colleague were representing the ultimate 'astronaut' aesthetic: An unfeeling, completely stable even under pressure human who follows a routine schedule, trying to make rational, logical decisions devoid of passion. Basically what mission control wishes all astronauts embodied perfectly. Kubrick seems to have been imagining him the 'man of tomorrow', all of the suppressed humanity needed to function like a robot in months of deep space. The perfect tool, basically. While HAL was supposed to be that, but wasn't; the conflicting instructions given by the mission's true masters confusing it all the way to murder. In Interstellar the astronauts / human characters aren't meant to be like Bowman from 2001, and they're given backstories and conflict, but they just fail to be particularly memorable or likable I guess. |
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:33 |
|
precision posted:stanley kubrick in fact WAS hired to fake a moon landing, however, he insisted on doing by actually filming it on the moon. it ranks as one of his lesser works due to a weak script, i mean the only good line was used in every trailer hahaha
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:58 |
|
wait i dont get it
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:59 |
|
i watched the hitman movie... i think it was cool. you get see a lot of pretty shots but theres some cool action. |
# ? Sep 10, 2015 00:44 |
|
I saw a movie called "Smoke Signals". It was pretty deep, with quite a few messages. It's on Netflix, among other places for streaming. Speaking of HAL- if you take the letters IBM and go back one letter in the acronym, you get... HAL. HAL was supposed to represent the apex of Big Blue, by the year 2001. https://i.imgur.com/QKTkerO.mp4 |
# ? Sep 10, 2015 01:03 |
|
extended editions of LOTR movies are for when you want to waste your life, but not just like, a little bit, you want to waste your life as much as possible |
# ? Sep 10, 2015 03:19 |
|
what do y'all think about Moon? it was kind of neat in a space thriller kind of way, but I felt it tried too hard to emulate 2001 with Gerdy. it didn't really do anything new or groundbreaking, and pretty much borrowed every theme from elsewhere. but it still managed to be a pretty good flick despite that, or maybe even because of it |
# ? Sep 10, 2015 18:36 |
|
Moon was a great movie, I find Sam Rockwell to be an amazing and talented actor. I first saw him in the movie Galaxy Quest a buncha years ago (a sort of spoof of Star Trek and the genre in general but at the same time... well, I would say watch it. It's got Sigourney Weaver, Alan Rickman and Tim Allen in it!) and he did a great job as "plucky comic relief". He was also great in the Way, Way Back as a waterpark manager, and of course he was the Saloon owner in Cowboys and Aliens, all movies I can also say I strongly recommend watching.
https://i.imgur.com/QKTkerO.mp4 |
# ? Sep 10, 2015 18:55 |
|
yeah moon is one of those movies that you should watch at least once
I must create a system or be enslaved by another mans; I will not reason and compare: my business is to create. - William Blake |
# ? Sep 10, 2015 21:37 |
Gerdy
---------------- |
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 01:20 |
i saw this movbie called uhhh... EERMmmm (thinking in my head) uhh ironic movie ironic movie uhh... yelling: bad rats |
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 01:38 |
|
ulvir posted:what do y'all think about Moon? it was kind of neat in a space thriller kind of way, but I felt it tried too hard to emulate 2001 with Gerdy. it didn't really do anything new or groundbreaking, and pretty much borrowed every theme from elsewhere. but it still managed to be a pretty good flick despite that, or maybe even because of it It was good. I liked how they subverted your expectations of Gerty. The soundtrack was amazing.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 01:42 |
|
ulvir posted:what do y'all think about Moon? it was kind of neat in a space thriller kind of way, but I felt it tried too hard to emulate 2001 with Gerdy. it didn't really do anything new or groundbreaking, and pretty much borrowed every theme from elsewhere. but it still managed to be a pretty good flick despite that, or maybe even because of it its weird i was just thinking about that movie right before you posted it probably because of the moon thread
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 01:43 |
|
alnilam posted:somehow despite being from 1967 i still think 2001 has the most convincing and graceful space scenes of any movie ever 2001 is one of my favorite movies. The only thing they didn't nail is the type of terrain on the moon, and that's because the movie was made a year before the actual moon landing. |
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:36 |
|
they got pretty close to what spaceflight technology might have looked like had the space program continued on the same spending levels and public interest though! The amount of detail is staggering!
I must create a system or be enslaved by another mans; I will not reason and compare: my business is to create. - William Blake |
# ? Sep 11, 2015 20:27 |
|
2001 is very good but as far as Kubrick films go The Shining is the top for me. There is so much weird stuff hidden in the movie. Like doors that go no where and turning corners too many times for the hotel to continue making sense. They built some of the hallways to be movable and would shift them around during filming. |
# ? Sep 11, 2015 22:35 |
|
ulvir posted:i love in bruges |
# ? Sep 12, 2015 00:01 |
|
ulvir posted:i love in bruges i love in bruges... i love in antwerp too... Heck i love all over the place |
# ? Sep 12, 2015 00:23 |
|
Afro Doug posted:this was a good movie. seven psychopaths was even better. they were both really good. |
# ? Sep 12, 2015 03:32 |
i can't rent interstellar, you can only buy it... is it worth twenty dollars...
---------------- |
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 03:40 |
|
Qwerinty posted:i can't rent interstellar, you can only buy it... is it worth twenty dollars... it's not |
# ? Sep 12, 2015 03:42 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 06:12 |
|
Qwerinty posted:i can't rent interstellar, you can only buy it... is it worth twenty dollars... probably not 20. maybe 10. |
# ? Sep 12, 2015 03:42 |