|
Give me a Lawful Good.
|
#
¿
Sep 11, 2015 22:10
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 18, 2024 11:22 |
|
|
It's pretty cool how Torment handled alignments. You didn't get to pick, you just started off true neutral and your choices caused you to shift.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Hello friends.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2015 22:25
|
|
|
This honestly feels like when he claimed mason right off the bat in the game that I'm running instead of keeping it under his hat.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2015 22:34
|
|
|
I mean it feels like he's telling the truth and not scum hiding under a mason claim.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
Maybe when someone pings you as a bad guy you should explain why their post reads as bad instead of just posting a siren.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2015 23:52
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Hello my alignment is FART aligned. Oh, you're chaotic neutral then?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 12:19
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I see you are role fishing, that is pretty scummy. No, I was making an observation that chaotic neutral is the most fart alignment.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 12:38
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Somebody has never hung out with Paladins. Pretty scummy imo. Thinking Paladins are more fart than chaotic neutral is pretty scummy imo.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 13:01
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:##Vote VivaNova What?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 13:31
|
|
VOTE VIVA NOVA RIGHT NOW
|
That's a really confusing post for a few reasons. Why are you sure he's scum? Why "right now"? Why will that change?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 13:40
|
|
|
Heres a reason: statistically and in the absence of an actual read, Viva is far more likely to be town than scum.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 14:05
|
|
|
All players are equally likely/unlikely to be scum at this point. I see no benefit to arbitrarily choose someone to push a dunk on before any real reads are generated. When he's on and can really respond, I'll read him.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 14:32
|
|
|
Sure let's summon the lurker. ##vote Tom
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 22:40
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I'm still hoping my vote will make imgay actually post something coherent. I used to think he never posted coherently in Mafia but he's actually been doing a remarkable amount of normal posting in my game so 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 22:48
|
|
|
Turns out this is actually reasonably effective at pushing people to get content out of them. I'm down with that. ##vote Hal
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 00:11
|
|
|
MC Eating Disorder posted:Lotta dodgy poo poo goon on here guys but vines is the dodgiest. Extremely superficial, no real scum reads of his own, contributed nothing before the lumpenkrieg and now seems happy to cheerleader without bothering to apply any pressure It's day 1, we haven't got any flips/results to go on so right now poking people to bring up some content is a solid course of action. It's good to make sure that people have some posts on record that we can examine in light of future information.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 01:09
|
|
|
I don't intend on letting Lumpen yank town around all game. I still haven't forgotten your play in HotSfia. 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
I'm not great at reading D1, but let's give it a go. uranus has been pinging me. He throws out accusations of being a badguy and sirens without justification for thinking of people as badguys. I have no idea what to make of imgay. I'd like to see some actual content from him, instead of this sonic bullshit. I dislike that TMM tried to send the game back into jokephase.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 01:29
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:It's more likely that he's just a pirate. This post after joke phase had ended.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 02:32
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:Not really. Please explain it to me! It pinged me regardless and I was asked to give my opinions.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
You have a pretty high opinion of yourself to think that having a null read on you D1 makes me scum.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 12:11
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:I think it's new as of yesterday. I'm in another game with him and he went hardcore about it A meta argument based on a game where he hasn't flipped is useless.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 12:25
|
|
|
I'm going to bed now, but I'll be around about 1-2 hours before deadline. I won't miss it, don't worry.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 12:39
|
|
|
MC read more as town to me when he started posting. Being against allowing anyone to take control of the discussion is a town mentality, and the scummier move would have been to allow it for now and try to take over the discussion later.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 21:44
|
|
|
Rereading Kashuno specifically, I think I am leaning scum. Things that pinged me that others haven't already talked a lot about :
Either scum, or just having a really off day at mafia. Lumpen posted:Wrong, also not an accurate representation of this game. Are you lifting arguments from another game, maybe? It's not a representation of this game, it's a representation of his view. I can understand seeing day 1 as being indicative of you being going to take control of the discussion. Allowing one player to do that is bad even if they seem townie.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
Oh, and ##vote kashuno. Will be sticking around until deadline.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:Q1. In your experience, if someone mischaracterizes a Townie as "leadind people around D1", and tries to get that Townie lynched using that as an argument, is that person, in your experience, a Scum? A1. This is a slightly disingenuous question, as I do not know whether or not you are a Townie. A2. Once again, I do not know how accurately it reflects this game. It's not like I can predict with certainty how future days will go. A3. He is still reading as Townie to me. Being interested in avoiding one person having control over the discussion is a Townie viewpoint when a Scum player would just be able to night kill the person leading the discussion and then take over themselves.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
I haven't seen that argument done either way on D1. However, in my first game ever I saw MC Eating Disorder take control of the discussion as scum and completely dominate the game so I can understand him being wary of such a thing.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
I'll change my vote if the only alternative is no lunch.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 22:45
|
|
|
ugh. ##vote mc
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 22:50
|
|
|
+1  
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 22:51
|
|
|
he's already been ed, we're just waiting for mithross to flip him and close the thread.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 22:55
|
|
|
Section 31 posted:Wasn't there always a town-aligned vigilante in big game? At least in the last two games I'm in (one with you included) there was a vigilante. I'm throwing that possibility, which could be wrong in this case (but seems unlikely). That's a weird assumption to make.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2015 23:48
|
|
|
If I were scum, killing uranus (who I mentioned as a suspect and who considered me his primary suspect) would be a suicidal thing to do. If someone else were scum, killing uranus would result in very easily being able to implicate me.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2015 00:07
|
|
|
Hey Kashuno, you probably weren't around to answer this question before the lynch, but I'll say it again.quote:[Kashuno] joins in the Vivanova vote, but none of the other LumpenSteamrollerstm. Why did you like voting Viva but not the others?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
So you did.  I recant that point.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
Yeah, the gimmicky shitposty stuff is just frustrating. ##vote imgay At the very least, we're getting pressure on him to post better.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2015 04:22
|
|
|
I'll forgive him if he pulls anything as funny as "I singlehandedly cleared Hiipfire as town" this game though.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2015 04:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 18, 2024 11:22 |
|
|
We're not turboing him yet, we're just putting pressure down to see if he can actually give content when there's a gun to his head.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2015 06:26
|
|