|
anroid
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2015 12:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 06:06 |
|
|
Cyberbird posted:802.11b/g non-5 ghz 802.11n
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 04:34
|
|
|
Cat Face Joe posted:the vine is better cause you can hear their skeletons shatter link please
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 15:20
|
|
|
Kilroy posted:there are legitimate use cases for 2.4 like if you want the signal to travel through load-bearing walls without being attenuated to near-uselessness yeah of course but in more densely populated areas like apartments and townhouses, 2.4 ghz wifi is essentially useless. ive had to help so many friends discover their routers can do 5 ghz and suddenly the can actually use the internet connection theyre paying for instead of just wondering why their wifi cuts out constantly also no idea why the standards body allowed for 40 mhz 802.11n in 2.4 ghz, there's always some moron that has that turned on and is taking up 66% of the usable spectrum with his lovely linksys router
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2015 17:09
|
|
|
Sweevo posted:most non-poo poo routers let you access channels 12-14 too, so you can chill out on 14 while everyone else fights over 1-11 only 14 doesnt overlap, and that's illegal sir 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2015 18:25
|
|