|
Whiz Palace posted:"If it's longer than it's wide, it's a dick" would fit the meter better. Depends what meter you're singing it to. I'm imagining a bouncy Tom Lehrer style and it fits just fine.
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2016 18:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 23, 2024 18:40 |
|
|
Carbon dioxide posted:Hey Fathis Munk, how much ($) for a kilogram of restriction enzymes? If you have to ask, you can't afford it.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2016 06:33
|
|
|
Heath posted:How can you be said to have a relationship that's healthy but not enjoyable? If you're not enjoying it, it's not healthy by virtue of that. Conversely, how can you have s friendship that's healthy but not enjoyable? If anything, I guess it could be called s professional relationship, say between coworkers, but the graph specifically claims to describe friends.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2016 13:57
|
|
|
I need that laser pointer so bad.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2016 15:53
|
|
|
Cross-posting from the DnD image thread...
|
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2016 11:31
|
|
|
What's the red one?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 14, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
Everything about this screams fake.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2016 18:12
|
|
|
Postal Parcel posted:Where's Dee? Is she the middle of them all? This is politics and she is a woman, and thus her only role is to be a topic of discussion.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2016 05:47
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:So what is 00? Still 1.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2016 12:48
|
|
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:I've seen that image many times over the years and still don't understand how a single person is supposed to survive on a measly $230,000 2/5 Try harder.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 13, 2016 19:37
|
|
|
Aschlafly posted:Bonus points: If the Republicans had used one of these methods during the primary, there'd be no Trump. Interesting. Prove it please. Not saying you can't... I just want to see it explained.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 6, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
Pyramid scheme recruitment material?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2017 18:47
|
|
|
All of those things taste good though 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 17, 2017 06:55
|
|
|
Outrail posted:How long would it take to convince the average Trump voter that the chart actually is a commentary on Bush vs. Obama? How long does it take to finish high school?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 2, 2017 20:02
|
|
|
I don't have the tools to illustrate my point but bear with me: the only thing wrong with that graph is the size of the Melenchon bar. Probably whoever made the image entered another value than is written to draw that one bar. If it were elongated by a bit, the relative sizes would fit. A simple mistake that nevertheless should have been spotted. Unless that tv station has a particular beef with that one candidate?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2017 12:49
|
|
|
Jabor posted:You don't think a 1 being bigger than two other 1s put together counts as something wrong? O dang I missed that
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2017 14:44
|
|
|
Konec Hry posted:Battlefield One: 2 I've been trying to say this out loud but I can't make it past the pause after saying "one" without laughing.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2017 14:14
|
|
|
Foxhound posted:because when you see it at the store you turn 360 degrees and walk away That would leave you facing the game again.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2017 15:25
|
|
|
RandomPauI posted:I did. I remember Rorschach being acted well, young lady superheroine being generic, and CGI Dr. Manhattan orgy. Plus a sex scene that was waaay too graphic.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 10:31
|
|
|
This whole page: http://politiken.dk/udland/art5938193/Se-udviklingen-for-de-europæiske-socialdemokratier It shows the percentage of votes achieved/polled for various European social democratic parties.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2017 16:00
|
|
|
I'm the three asterisks, implying that this is not the first time they've had to explain themselves like this.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2017 14:50
|
|
|
Why isn't it organized by mean or something useful arrrrrgh
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2017 16:13
|
|
|
Dragonwagon posted:Pretty sure a single line works properly though. Pretty sure you don't understand the issue.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
Dragonwagon posted:I used the line tool which (I assume) goes along a great circle, so it actually shows how the people making the graph got their results. Oh dang, my bad. I just thought it looked like you'd drawn a straight line on an off-center portion of a picture of a randomly tilted globe, ignoring curvature and whatnot.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2017 07:46
|
|
|
Carbon dioxide posted:https://www.sbnation.com/a/17776-football (not a graph but a (visual/) story thing.) Dude I have to go to work, why are you showing me this? I'm too far in to quit and there's no way I'm taking a break from it. gently caress.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 22, 2017 08:55
|
|
|
 Seen in the offices of EUROSTAT, who really should know better.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 13, 2018 15:07
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/990935426872508416?s=15
|
|
#
¿
May 1, 2018 19:23
|
|
|
"slept with" I mean I get why they don't write "hosed" but there's got to be a more appropriate term.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 22, 2018 08:04
|
|
|
Albino Squirrel posted:God, that drives me crazy. I see people filling out death certificates as 'cardiac arrest due to respiratory failure due to pneumonia' and I'm all JUST WRITE PNEUMONIA! It fucks up the stats if you don't write pneumonia! I don't know where you're from but in Denmark they're required to do it that way, specifically for statistical reasons. The health data authority has an "AI" that picks out the underlying cause, regardless of the order it was written in. Said AI is under continuous development by medical professionals in several countries, and of course there is tons of more or less manual quality control. So probably not infinitely infallible, but pretty good. The diabetes examples is Interesting, and almost certainly will be debated at the next IRIS convention, though I haven't seen an abstract list yet. https://www.dimdi.de/dynamic/de/klassifikationen/icd/iris-institut/
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2019 20:10
|
|
|
Everyone gained in favorability except Biden, everyone gained in unfavorability except Sanders and Warren. A good graph. Also lol Williamson.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2019 15:02
|
|
|
Krankenstyle posted:the unification of germany was a mistake My girlfriend regularly corrects people who refer to her heritage as German. She's Prussian. 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2019 15:06
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2019 13:07
|
|
|
 from the Kaiser Family Foundation https://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/fact-sheet/coronavirus-tracker/
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2020 12:31
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1235865328074153986 the worst thing about this graph is the roughly equal areas of the two scenarios, i.e. total number of cases until the virus is "defeated".
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2020 16:47
|
|
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:That's the point. Spreading out the same number of cases over time means fewer cases happen when the system for handling them are at capacity. This means fewer people need hospitalization at times when there isn't space in the hospitals. While I am glad that the graph seems to have had an impact and that most countries have in fact enacted sweeping measures, I was (in the spirit of this thread) nitpicking the simplistic picture  You seem to be mistakenly accepting the implication that the total number of possible cases is constant regardless of strategy. My point was that without any preventative measures, the number of cases - both new and concurrent - would be much slower to fall than the red graph shows, and would in all likelihood continue to be higher for a longer time than in the case with measures. Imagine the height of the red area, but extended beyond the end of the blue area - and hopefully declinging over time before reaching some threshold value beyond which society collapses. Because without adequate quarantine as well as travel and assembly restrictions and the (already evident) attrition of medical staff and supplies the virus would spread farther, and repeated exposure might affect those who initially would not have fallen sick, or at the very least turn them into more effective vectors, increasing the reach and duration of the spread.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2020 09:29
|
|
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:No, I'm not. Oh good, my apologies for explaining it.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2020 12:15
|
|
|
AnoHito posted:In German, "girl" is not a feminine noun. Anyone who could look at that and not scrap the concept of gendered nouns from the language altogether has clearly long since gone insane. That's because it's composed of a feminine noun meaning "unwed/virgin female" and a diminutive suffix. That suffix, whenever it is used, determines the gender of the compound word and adds an umlaut (or ¨) to to the first syllable) Magd + chen = Mädchen There doesn't seem to be a word just for "girl" that isn't somehow linked to her future status as a spouse.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2020 08:29
|
|
|
Antigravitas posted:Meanwhile… Almost a perfectly solved cat's cradle, except for northern Spain and the direct line from Hamburg to Frankfurt bypassing Köln. I missed a plane last year trying to figure that last one out, and the signage on the station was no help at all.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2020 11:28
|
|
|
But you guys they compared the algorithm to results obtained from human surveys and it matched! Which they apparently dont' realize is just another way of saying they've automated the obvious euro-centric bias of their focus group, by training an AI on historical euro-centric preferences. 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2020 14:31
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 23, 2024 18:40 |
|
|
We're going to need a bigger statement.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2020 12:42
|
|