HardDisk posted:

TBH the WTC fell flat for everyone.

ryden posted:

Tiggum posted:

Wait, what? There are elections for public officials that are part of an internal party election not open to the public in general?

hooah posted:

"Mohammedans"?

dpbjinc posted:

Spotted this in the Gay Marriage thread in D&D:



What it looks like: Every state except California allows evil people to murder trans people and get away with it!

What it actually means: In California, this defense will not work because the law says so and the judge will strike it from the record. Elsewhere in the US, this defense will not work because the prosecution isn't going to let psychopaths on the jury.

Cat Hatter posted:

I'd answer 50% and explain that the answer couldn't possibly be A or D because its impossible to be both. Picking randomly between the two valid answers yields 50% probability of being correct.

Not that it matters, this is a "one hand clapping" question where there isn't a right answer and they just want to see how you thought through it.

CharlieWhiskey posted:

Are people supposed to masturbate to this?

Dreddout posted:

Norway why?

Zemyla posted:

I'm pretty sure HRT for transwomen does shrink the penis. This is something most of them don't have a problem with.

Pakled posted:

There are definitely some groups on the left I'd classify as "regressive" who use aspects of leftist or progressive ideology to justify racism/sexism/homophobia/etc. Like TERFs or Hoteps or leftists who are against immigration from a "the capitalist class uses immigration to drive down the price of labor" perspective.

But those groups are never who conservatives are talking about when they say "regressive left" so

ishikabibble posted:

Anti-choice? Are you still taking about TERFs? Because there's no way someone qualifying for 'Radical Feminist' would be anything but pro-choice.

ikanreed posted:

Like loving every other source of information in this day and age, critics accuse the IEA who projected the data in that graph of being mostly controlled by the industries they're supposed to supervise.

In particular they constantly underestimate renewables production capacity, instead suggesting sequestration and nuclear as the only viable solutions to climate change.

Probably that graph was created by an aggrieved greenie who views them exactly that way.

The Cheshire Cat posted:

Hasn't it just been the F35 for like the last decade or so? Maybe people have just learned to recognize what it looks like and don't get excited anymore.

C.M. Kruger posted:

Nah there's still a lot of spooky stuff flying around the southwest/midwest but it's mainly drones or prototypes for stuff like the B-21 or the alleged Project IX stealth transport/tanker.

Son of Thunderbeast posted: