|
To recap from before, I provided in this thread a List derived from Logic that reveals to us a startling truth:Nations NOT Destined for the Turbomegadeath posted:1. Republic of Cuba I made this list after disabling my biases and preconceptions and it is therefore Truth. And we see from it that nations that reject the Church of Property Rights's teachings of Capitalism are far less likely to experience Turbomegadeath. I would like to make my closing remark for this thread that I believe we have answered the question posited in the OP; we should care about the Church of Property Rights, because our lives and the lives of everyone we care about depends on us crushing this doomsday cult, and defeating their teachings, before they bring the Turbomegadeath down upon us. I thank you all for your participation in this thread, and to Jrod I say I look forward to your next theological debate (although I don't know if D&D is the best place for a theology debate?).
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 21:11 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 07:31 |
|
jrode is a dumb smelly baby and I hope to see him again in future so I can laugh at his idiot opinions put forward as fact.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 21:29 |
Radish posted:Doesn't "smelly, outcast paranoiac" pretty much describe Alan Moore? Didn't he go live in the middle of no where and grow a crazy man beard or am I thinking of the guy who originally made Wonder Woman?
|
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 21:35 |
|
Someday JRod will return to us, and someday we will find an honest libertarian. They will not be the same day.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 21:45 |
|
Nolanar posted:Someday JRod will return to us, and someday we will find an honest libertarian. They will not be the same day. While the former is certain, I remain less than convinced of the latter. Anyway, for my last post in the thread before it closes, I'd like to point out that we did actually make progress on one front: Jrod finally was forced to weigh in on the watermelon issue, all questions about which he had previously dodged. As libertarian threads go, that makes this one a resounding success, and we should all be proud we contributed to it.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 22:11 |
|
This thread created joinder with my heart! Thanks to Caros et al. for making this a really informative thread.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 22:13 |
|
Yeah, if there's one thing I'd say, it's that I hope people keep demolishing jrod - not only for the vicious enjoyment of it, but because we tend to learn a lot when people with solid knowledge and background on subjects drop truth bombs on his drivel.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 22:16 |
|
Don't worry guys, we're about due for a new Eripsa thread.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 22:20 |
|
Nessus posted:Yeah and we're not putting that on him, he openly said in a post (I still can't find it because I am bad at computer) that you can't actually disprove his economic theories with mere evidence, merely support them or - perhaps, generously - slightly refine their execution. Hahaha what, he must think unfalsifiability is the mark of a strong claim. Because it looks like it is, if you don't know science or reading. Ah, Praxeology. Simple rules for a simple mind. Stinky_Pete fucked around with this message at 22:27 on Feb 21, 2016 |
# ? Feb 21, 2016 22:24 |
|
Purestrain goldmine this thread.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 22:33 |
|
SedanChair posted:Hey I'd love to find a libertarian who learned good hand-to-hand skills but they end up learning mall ninjutsu due to the same lack of critical thinking that made them libertarians
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 22:34 |
|
Anticheese posted:Purestrain goldmine this thread. Is it possible to send this one to the LF Goldmine? It may have resided in D&D, but in its heart of hearts this thread was, truly, The Most LF.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 23:04 |
|
Death to Capitalism
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 23:19 |
|
gently caress Libertarianism forever and ever. Amen.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2016 23:56 |
|
Hbomberguy posted:I hope JRod or the other libs come back and make a new thread so we can watch the meltdown all over again. It was a run ride. Considering he's down this at least seven other times I can think of, you don't have to worry.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 00:56 |
|
jrodefeld more like j-chode failed
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 00:59 |
|
Tesseraction posted:jrodefeld more like Wrap it up, jrodailures.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 01:31 |
|
Nessus posted:Yeah and we're not putting that on him, he openly said in a post (I still can't find it because I am bad at computer) that you can't actually disprove his economic theories with mere evidence, merely support them or - perhaps, generously - slightly refine their execution. jrodefeld posted:When I discussed the minimum wage with you all before, you tried to convince me that even though all the “old” empirical studies seemed to show a negative employment effect from minimum wage laws, and economic textbooks taught that there was a negative employment effect, and economic theory would demand that this is so, new studies overturned all that old wisdom and purported to prove that there is no disemployment effect from minimum wage hikes. Such “studies”, if they are truly to be taken seriously as dispassionate research into labor markets and not political advocacy masquerading as science, are deeply called into question when one further examines the literature. *the thread does so* jrodefeld posted:I think this is a good time to talk about the limits of empirical studies when looking at social phenomenon. Empiricism in the hard sciences is pretty straightforward because studies can be conducted with great specificity and are easily reproducible by other scientists. In contrast, human behavior in a complex economy is much more difficult to evaluate purely on an empirical basis. I've studied this issue for a while, and what has come up again and again is an empirical economist releases a paper that purports to prove a specific assertion, and then subsequent economists find it impossible to reproduce the results found because they cannot isolate the variables with regards to human action in a complex environment. Studies can demonstrate that I am right, but if it turns out they disagree with my predictions then they were worthless all along. This is what happens when you turn cognitive bias into an entire epistemology.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 01:54 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 07:31 |
|
I have hereby DOCKED my person at this point of the thread, ergo all further posts in this thread belong to me as well as my fictitious corporate entity. If you attempt to post in this thread then you are violating the NAP, and the only form of acceptable compensation for this flagrant violation of my property rights will be the payment of a sum of 10,000 bitcoins sent to me directly. My wallet address is 1HitLerDiDNothingWrongggggghJew
|
# ? Feb 22, 2016 02:13 |