|
Hi
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 14:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 15:53 |
|
|
I am a melee dude.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 15:18
|
|
|
My scum tell is a scum read someone convinces themselves of before they start reading my posts.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 18:47
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Please don't be a miserable sad sack friend, this is the fun thread. That's a legitimate response.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:It's wildly hyperbolic and only applies to me itt. It could be said that if viewed in that light your comment is anti-town both in vibes and in intent. I wasn't thinking of you at all when I wrote it. It applies to many people. Each time I am lynched as scum I go back and try to figure out why. I'll then make an effort in the next game to not do whatever it is that I thought got me lynched regardless of my alignment. Things I've taken out of my game include random distancing posts on scum buddies, voting with too short of justifications (unless I am baiting as town to try to spark content), quickly thought of joke comments, and other stuff. I don't know if I have a scum tell that prevails game after game. If I identified that tell, I'd try to remove it. If you know something, I'd love to hear it.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Perhaps it'd be more accurate to say that you don't convince people as much rather than how convincing you are as either? It's weird to make those separate things but I think that's a more exact answer. You make a case that you don't jump around the thread to "get done" as scum but as town you will actually argue points etc I think this is very wrong. I usually lead lynches as scum.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 19:15
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I've noticed you back down quietly and quickly when you are scum and if nobody bites on one of your baiting posts. Thanks on both things.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 19:16
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Well, you won't catch me going back to prove it one way or the other because I don't actually give a heck Cool
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
I've done a lot of both lately. I try to switch up styles to see what works and what I have time to do. I think in TNG I was pretty busy and posting in spurts.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 19:40
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Gee merk, awfully defensive, huh? You got em.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 20:01
|
|
|
##vote Ecco
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:nobody disagreed with you? also I'm pretty sure merk's vote is a grumpyvote over my cipher while Diqnol's is still kinda nonsense, so, I wouldn't be too pleased with yourself. I voted you because your attempt to spark content went nowhere and you made no attempt to make it go anywhere but nowhere.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2015 03:24
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:"you asked for content and it didn't help!" merk posted:I voted you because your attempt to spark content went nowhere and you made no attempt to make it go anywhere but nowhere. ##vote Ecco
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2015 03:48
|
|
|
In case it isn't obvious, Ecco's misrepresentation of my vote is an attempt to discredit it rather than try to learn my alignment from it. He did the same thing with Diqnol's vote.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I'm not feeling ecco. I suggest that you never give your opinion about alignment unless a day is nearing over and you dramatically disagree with the direction the thread is going or you have role-based information that is pertinent. We don't learn much about alignment of people making cases when the confirmed town tells us what to do.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2015 03:54
|
|
|
Ecco: calling votes dumb and nonsense persuades no one. I had to force myself to read your whole post after wanting to skip the bulk when you went schoolyard.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2015 13:21
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:oh yeah going with the time honored slurs of "nonsense" and "silly." I'm a veritable Tarantino. Saying posts are bad is not persuasive. It detracts from everything else you are trying to say. That said, what you said wasn't persuasive. I like my vote.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2015 16:44
|
|
|
I'm a good dude to be in a battle as a melee.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2015 19:51
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:hey merk do you have any thoughts about the game so far aside from me? Nope. Playing mostly on a phone this weekend.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2015 19:57
|
|
|
Diqnol why do you keep avoiding Ecco's question about a read on me? That's like three times.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2015 23:23
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:imo these are bad answers EccoRaven posted:it is a bad post. EccoRaven posted:I think KB's evasion of the question and case against me is pretty bad. Still deciding if it's dumb or scum though. EccoRaven posted:that's a little unreasonable. EccoRaven posted:those are nonsense opinions! EccoRaven posted:nah those are some dumb votes too. EccoRaven posted:They're nonsense posts. Sorry you guys made posts of nonsense! EccoRaven posted:Diqnol's point is dumb too EccoRaven posted:It reads like KB made a dumb post EccoRaven posted:you're kind of wrong then.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 03:06
|
|
|
See ya
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 03:06
|
|
|
I don't know who is a good second lynch. I agree with getting rid of a lurker.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 03:08
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:Lurker lynch sounds good This guy doesn't really play mafia. He's a good second lynch.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 03:09
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:You guys are really deadset on lynching me for some reason You're basically a lurker.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 03:13
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:get bent. People voted you, and your response was to call each person's vote dumb, bad, or stupid which looks like you trying to discredit them. It's a great d1 case.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 03:16
|
|
|
FoxTerrier posted:If you don't have any scum reads beyond Ecco, do you have any Town ones? No, I don't usually make town reads. I guess maybe I should in this format. Nothing jumps out right now though.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 03:32
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:##vote merk merk posted:Nope. Playing mostly on a phone this weekend. ?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 03:32
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:merk a better mafia player than I once said that anyone can make a three bulletpoint case on someone else in 15 minutes on their phone. merk posted:In case it isn't obvious, Ecco's misrepresentation of my vote is an attempt to discredit it rather than try to learn my alignment from it. He did the same thing with Diqnol's vote. I ask again: ?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 04:16
|
|
|
My vote on Ecco is locked.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 04:17
|
|
|
I've eviscerated your case with no effort at all, and here you are still trying to push it.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 04:23
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Actually, I just thought of one thing that would help. If you can find games of yours where you've done this same weird reinterpretation of people's posts thing as town, I'm willing to read any exchanges from those that you point out and see if this is just your thing. This is really bad. Don't let him provide his own meta defense. If you want to make a read, find it yourself.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 04:45
|
|
|
I also think it's scummy to go into other games to try to get an alignment read on someone. There's plenty of stuff here. One example of his meta from another game is irrelevant.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 04:46
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:I hope you at least see where I was coming from, since it's the truth. Your inability to see where I'm coming from is one of the main reasons why I'm very confident in my vote on you. I told you I was playing most of the game on my phone, and you somehow ignored that when making a post about how I've played a backseat today. I made a great d1 case on you. Why can't you put yourself in my shoes and see how I came to that case? Because you're scum.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 04:47
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:nah. This case is going to get you lynched today. If you can't see it, maybe use this as a takeaway to improve for the next game.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 05:00
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:no, "this case" isn't getting me hanged today. A combination of a bunch of cases of varying veracity will do that. I am not going to address points that I don't think are legitimate coming from someone who I'm pretty sure flips scum.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 06:13
|
|
|
Rarity posted:You also lead lynches as town, it's a null tell. Right, it's why I commented on the post. It is so wrong that it's concerning.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 15:28
|
|
|
##vote Hiopfire Can look deeper later. Who else are you sending to battle and is off the table?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 16:57
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:hey merk. hey. hey merk. I thought about advocating a you/Diqnol lynch last night but thought that would kill the number of posts in the thread too much on day 1. With you off the table I may vote him. He's acting weird.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 17:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 15:53 |
|
|
Someone said that the Pearl "slap fight" between Diqnol and me was bad. gently caress you. I was 100% right. There's also been no drama or slap fighting between Diqnol and me in this game so I don't understand that comment. Who said that? In hindsight it feels scummy.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2015 17:18
|
|