|
So I know that it's very gauche, but I'll say that obvious stability problems aside (and the hilarious streamers blaming Windows for the crashing), this game looks more feature-complete than I ever thought it'd get. I think that's more a statement on expectations than execution, but still. fake edit: Ha, "server full" messages in a tiny mock-up.
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 07:44 |
|
|
DreadLlama posted:[citation needed] I don't really like defending Octopode, but you're being loving ridiculous.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 28, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
So I've got to say, I had fun in Star Citizen today. After a bit of clicking around to get into the spaceship instance (could these be better labelled?), I managed to request and get into a Retaliator without falling through the floor (for the first time!). I promptly spent the next five minutes ramming ships off landing pads until cigphysics.mp4 happened and the ship somehow ejected me and starting flying off at crazy speeds. I went and requested another ship to try and catch it but even at boosting speeds I couldn't catch up. So it gave me the idea to not just crash into ships on landing pads, but to bowl them off the pads until they were far enough away from the space station to shoot them. I only managed it once before dying, but it was pretty fun. GOTY.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2015 20:58
|
|
|
Unfunny Poster posted:Oh also I'm apparently somehow akin to correcting people about Hitler God, reddit is such an awful community and the SC subreddit is the among the worst subs. The only right opinion is the groupthink opinion. Not that I'd encourage vote brigading, but folks who are otherwise engaged in the reddits should definitely go try and combat the general nastiness over there.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:Why bother We should fight ebaumsworld next.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2016 22:58
|
|
|
We should declare war on reddit in a popular video game or something
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 19:08
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Having rules and enforcing them is also a thing that seems to work. Banned for multiple violations of forum rules 3, 9, and 11.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
kikkelivelho posted:Anything good happen during the last 5000 loving posts? I haven't been following this clusterfuck lately. Hillary Clintons Thong posted:I had fun making it thats all that matters
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
90% of this thread is this gif.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 18:14
|
|
|
God macharial420 is seriously a bitter, bitter person. On the topic of whether Squadron 42 will ever show up on Steam, in response to an article saying that most big games end up on Steam:Reddit Warrior, macharial420 posted:Wow.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 13, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
A Neurotic Jew posted:the die-hards also usually don't realize that this thread was around mocking Star Citizen way before Derek Smart entered the ring. They just can't fathom that people might have come to these conclusions about the game completely independent of The Missives. They also don't realize that we're actually mocking Derek Smart at the same time 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 13, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Which do you think? quote:Have you validated Beer4TheBeerGod's emails yet? Just curious brah. Aieris_ posted:Do I care to brah? Journalism at its finest!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
Because I can contain myself in the brown sea:Brown Sea posted:Special Notes: No door fixes  e: beaten. but formatting. so there.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Apparently adjusting the Freelancer's speed is a balance tweak, but adjusting the Glaive/Scythe is a fix. 4.1 GBs. XML has grown, clearly.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 01:24
|
|
|
This is ridiculous. I've said more than once in this thread that Star Citizen is turning out better than I'd actually expected and I was impressed with the progress they've made. Of course, that's mostly because my expectations are so drat low, but whateva. But I've never once been censored by "the horde" or bullied. The only person who I'd say has been was probably Octopode, (and frankly there was plenty of stupidity to go 'round there) Compare that to reddit where there is actual censorship, to the point where your opinion is put greyed out, minimized at the bottom of the page, if not flat-out deleted. Have there been any deleted posts here? Was Octopode banned? I don't think so? Where's the censorship again? vyst posted:Hey is this a game yet? Yes. Load into game and bowl citizen's ships off of landing platforms. It's awesome.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 21, 2016 02:14
|
|
|
I'll go on record as saying SC's ships look fine, even good. A common critique here is that SC has abandoned fun for realism. SC's ship designs are fun, so I would applaud them for that. The problem gets to be when they try to justify their awful physics simulation that means they have to re-re-re-design ships over and over because while it looks cool to have swoopy fins with engines on them, it doesn't work at all in terms of physics. So rather than critiquing pretend spaceship jpegs, let's critique the stupid as gently caress system that dictates that every ship must follow some questionable physics system.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 21, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
Sedisp posted:But they aren't fun. They just look like blocks with fins glued on. In a universe where some other blocks don't need fins for no discernible reason. Well that's just like you're opinion man, or however this meme goes. It doesn't really matter, the whole thing is a pretend space ship game. Why are there dozens of posts about a completely subjective thing when there are real, actual, concrete examples of how this game is hosed. Same thing with this whole Sandi degree business. Can we stop being creepy and leave that to reddit? trucutru posted:Hey, psst... they are not simulating physics. that's 100% pure bullshit, the ships have no feeling of mass. Yeah, we've known that from the start when they had completely out of what "mass" measurements for all the ships. That's why I said "questionable" However, I have no issues believing that they're trying to model thrust based on position and size of whatever random thrusters they feel like sticking on. We've seen enough bullshit behavior to justify that.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 21, 2016 20:20
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Oh wow an actual ban. Is that an actual ban though? It still says he's "On Probation" and on his Citizen profile it just says "This citizen is currently on probation until 2016-02-05 12:01 for misconduct." Or do they double-up bans and probations?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2016 15:58
|
|
|
Octopode posted:I think people are a little too up in arms about something that probably needs to happen if they want the game to ever actually come out; for all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over broken promises and un-lived up to hype, sacrificing what was, ultimately, an extraneous game mode largely disconnected from the core gameplay experience is a better project management decision than CIG has shown in the past. If they manage to stick out all the vitriol associated with it, it will say a lot about whether they are going to be able to run a functional game that appeals to more than whales in the face of inevitable outcry from the $15K+ backers or if they are going to cave to the very loud minority in the face of unpopular decisions that are better for the game. For what it's worth, I agree. I knew Smartians (I came up with that myself, Reddit, be sure to credit me) would be all over it because it's a broken promise, but it was a good move given the environment CIG put themselves in. Frankly, it was not a great idea anyway. Though it was hilarious to see Reddit try play pretend and say that this would clearly be the next great MilSim shooter that puts Call of Duty to shame. Who the gently caress seriously wanted a janky FPS clone out of this anyway. That's not to say that breaking commitments is okay, but honestly, hasn't making ridiculous claims and promises been SC's problem since the beginning? Obviously it'd be better if they stopped making them in the first place, but at least they're backing off on them when it makes sense to do so. Yes, there's still the huge issue of CIG getting themselves into the situation in the first place, their complete and utter lack of open communication about anything of substance, and then their rapid back pedaling when questioned on anything that might threaten their whale-base. But let's be honest, for the game to actually materialize, canning Star Marine(tm) was a good move.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2016 18:15
|
|
|
tooterfish posted:I still don't understand why they opened four studios. How else could Chris and Sandi justify jetsetting while also writing it off as a business expense? Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to London to
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
Eonwe posted:What dumb pie in the sky game do we follow next Line of Defense
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2016 03:28
|
|
|
alphabettitouretti posted:The first task in Goat Simulator. https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/4l2jll/mockery_is_a_form_of_flattery/ quote:its not an SC spoof.......it's a sci-fi spoof, I don't even see anything vaguely SC in there. quote:Where do you see the specific parts for Star Citizen? The crowdfunding? Heard a bunch of other space sim games did that, too, successfully. quote:Actually Star Citizen it one of the few big scifi franchises I don't see represented. quote:there is zero reference to SC
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2016 15:35
|
|
|
Abongination posted:lol if this is the "e.l.e" Derek Smart overblowing something that we already knew? Shocked!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2016 15:48
|
|
|
Dante80 posted:Where exactly does it say that? As was said above, this isn't new. The massive green/red mess here under Section XIII D & E is the juicy bits.  
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2016 15:27
|
|
|
Wafflz posted:lol @ you guys thinking derek needs actual proof to start saying "confirmed". I mean, he's literally just copy/pasting whatever Sarsapariller dug up and saying "confirmed". I highly doubt he's done any original research here.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 07:44 |
|
|
MeLKoR posted:
I want to get off Mr. Derek's Wild Ride.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2016 20:07
|
|
