|
T.G. Xarbala posted:Like if you wanted us to sympathize with the people you're going after, Dsmart, it's working. Secretly a villain-for-hire bringing in funding via the reverse double Streisand gambit... it all makes sense now
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Mar 16, 2025 06:51 |
|
|
Thread has been removed from /r/starcitizen
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2015 15:54
|
|
|
SneakyFrog posted:what do you call a group of A Vault 108  < "Gary?"
|
|
#
¿
Oct 29, 2015 19:26
|
|
|
Dirty Hairy posted:Unrelated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42KCDCuIuc4 Why isn't everyone flying like this? It's difficult to do with kb+mouse or an Xbox controller.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2015 02:03
|
|
|
Io_ posted:also momentum. This should help:  https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15031-Star-Citizen-Alpha-20-Flight-Model-Changes Seems a bit weird at first to imitate greater momentum by artificially limiting the rate of change in thrust, but apparently when people tried making their own mods with much lower max acceleration, no one could kill each other because of the huge turn radius and limited time on target. 
Raticus79 fucked around with this message at 16:45 on Oct 30, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2015 16:35
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:It's messed up. Does anything in particular stand out to you as requiring different models rather than different parameters here? https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15031-Star-Citizen-Alpha-20-Flight-Model-Changes Seems like they're essentially just three different max speeds with corresponding changes in allowed maneuvering thrust. It's not like they're dealing with aerodynamics in these so they're relatively minor tweaks. Surface flight could be a different story. I wonder if they'll bother with gravity and aerodynamics or just handwave it as being handled by the thrusters.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2015 16:44
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Oh that's new. I haven't seen that accusation yet. If it's true, that's some seriously messed up poo poo right there. I mean seriously, why would I even go after imgur? Yeah, the original post about it mentioned "burning down our JPEGs", suggesting it had been meant literally.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:03
|
|
|
Tank Boy Ken posted:You can't literally burn .jpgs. The most you can do is to burn the file storage device that contains the .jpgs. Or delete them. But you can not burn the actual file. It's ok, according to the dictionary literally also means figuratively now. GG popular usage.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:05
|
|
|
G0RF posted:
Ha, called it. Just in time for the anniversary sale.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 09:04
|
|
|
Chalks posted:Hey guys it looks like there's a new project coming up that we should all get behind. Paywalling the Star Citizen threads and giving Derek a cut?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 15:45
|
|
|
wyoak posted:this guy sounds smart, maybe he left the company on his own, chasing the dragon of another kickstarted project Better hope that cup is the only thing being rendered at the time... I tried out the PhysX Flex fluid demo and it's really demanding.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 17:29
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:wow! Is that real? I'm not logged in right. You should screen cap and imgur that poo poo. RIGHT NOW!! Real post by a normal poster in the concierge forum, not concierge support.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 19:43
|
|
|
Double speed? The merlin's agile, but not that agile. edit: actually a gladius if anyone cares, and the flight model changes aren't in yet. Source Raticus79 fucked around with this message at 19:42 on Nov 4, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2015 18:21
|
|
|
BastionPete posted:Well, I lost access to my old account from 2007, so I thought I'd make myself a brand spanking new one to contribute to this discussion. I even bought premium so I could be privy to all the SuperSecretTM stuff going on. Yeah, I probably would have done the same thing if I hadn't noticed a few slight variations in the wording of that message. Edit: aww yeah BonziBUDDY Raticus79 fucked around with this message at 20:49 on Nov 4, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2015 20:22
|
|
|
njark posted:we still posting cats? *frrrt* "GET A REFUUUUND!"
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2015 23:48
|
|
|
Raskolnikov posted:I wish I had a real time graph of how many people are playing Arena Commander at any given time. I imagine it looks something like this: http://steamcharts.com/app/37000 This person tracked it via leaderboard update times for a while: https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/260416/graph-arena-commander-player-participation-8-22-update Check the "players per day" rows in the right column. About 400 to 1000 per day overall (3 months ago).
|
|
#
¿
Nov 6, 2015 07:46
|
|
|
notoriousman posted:isn't the vox thing happening, like, now Yeah, it's live now. No email verification needed so you can enter a garbage name+email and connect. Pretty straightforward and unremarkable talk so far.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 8, 2015 01:54
|
|
|
G0RF posted:Is there a way to watch this without registering and/or touching poo? https://global.gotowebinar.com/join/1400150363015143170/712848954 Enter garbage name+email and you're in. No verification step so it doesn't need to be a valid email.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 8, 2015 01:59
|
|
|
I wonder how much mileage you can really get out of the "how do we know the 94 million really all came from backers" concern. In the same vein, you could ask whether there really is 94 million at all. There's this kind of stuff: http://www.allchinatech.com/?p=360 Working under the assumption for now that misleading people that way is legal, what would be in it for them to overstate the funding? Easy way to increase confidence in the project and get people to buy base packages while they're seen as discounted preorders? Could make sense when they're ready to ramp up the celebrity-driven SQ42 promotion for AAA mass market (people who respond to celebrity-driven marketing). They'd get less from the people kicking in on the "help make the dream happen" angle. The amount coming in from people paying to start in better ships would be pretty much unchanged. In reality, I'm guessing they wouldn't get into that in the first place because of the potential legal trouble with that level of fraud.  
|
|
#
¿
Nov 8, 2015 05:30
|
|
|
no_recall posted:"Bitter Tears Platinum Card" You can get the tears as a cutout pattern around the border of the card.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 10, 2015 03:41
|
|
|
While the 300k funding and the agreement that goes with that would make for some interesting drama, there's no way they'll have trouble hitting the mark. They're not even in the last 48 hours yet and they only need 2.5% more of the total.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 17, 2015 23:48
|
|
|
Dante80 posted:https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15067-AnniVERSEary-Sale-Kickoff People who bought the Constellation Phoenix at a premium on the gray market are going to be mad.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2015 22:04
|
|
|
AP posted:https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15071-AnniVERSEary-Sale-Pirates Down to 650 https://robertsspaceindustries.com/pledge/Combos/Infamous-Package I'm surprised there were enough people willing to own three cutlasses that it sold out.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2015 19:10
|
|
|
PTU patch is live.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2015 03:23
|
|
|
Warcabbit posted:So, how's the PTU patch? What changed? People are still getting frequent crashes, but the option to go straight from the menu to the Crusader station without needing to go through the hangar speeds things up at least.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2015 04:27
|
|
|
I wonder where the "fixed an issue where a feature wasn't implemented yet" patch notes style got started. I noticed Blizzard does it too.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2015 05:58
|
|
|
Orcs and Ostriches posted:Not allowing store credit seems really hosed up. People were melting their existing $45 packages and replacing them with these $30 ones purchased using that credit. They were selling out in a few minutes each morning because people were picking up a free $15 credit without having to spend anything. With this change, those people have to spend an additional $30 to pick up the discount package and after melting the previous package for store credit, they're with a $45 credit to apply to CCU or an additional ship. It cuts out the people looking for a free $15 credit and now it's only useful for new players or people willing to be in for at least $75.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2015 22:05
|
|
|
So they did limit quantity on the Phoenix sale after all (5000). Can't CCU to it, so no way to get LTI on these ones. People have to buy the full ship and it comes with 3 year insurance. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15079-AnniVERSEary-Sale-Transporters
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
Could just fire up Cheat Engine and track down the doubles which should be holding 64 bit global position coordinates... shouldn't be too hard if you quantum drive to random points and then just do changed/unchanged checks.
Raticus79 fucked around with this message at 16:12 on Dec 3, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2015 16:05
|
|
|
Sarsapariller posted:Edit: Oh hey they rolled it out to the first 200,000 backers because it's obviously in a stable enough state to do that! I'm going to stop making predictions about when they will or will not roll poo poo out- their release schedule is clearly not governed by any concerns about keeping the game presentable. Or any other normal human logic, as far as I can tell. Driving hard for that Dec 16 livestream Ben mentioned, I'd say. Client side crashes are really frequent (usually at the first beacon if you even make it there). Will need to wait for the next round of in-progress crash fixes they mentioned.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2015 11:31
|
|
|
thatguy posted:How does Smart have more posts in this thread than I'm disappointed by the lack of  in this post.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2016 05:50
|
|
and Peter Gabriel? I'm disappointed in you guys, you're better than that.
|
|
| # ¿ Mar 16, 2025 06:51 |
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Over 12% of FLJK Goonrathi have [REDACTED] accounts, meaning those accounts were closed. To my knowledge the only way an account is closed is if the account is refunded. Go to your org admin page, members tab. You should see their account name and "membership: redacted". "Public: Everyone can see you’re part of that Org. It shows up in your Citizen Dossier, and you show up in its Member list. Redacted: People can see that you’re part of “an” Org, but can’t see which. Your Citizen Dossier has a “Redacted” block where that Org would be, and you show up as “Redacted” in its Member List. All “Redacted” blocks make it impossible to trace the Member or the Org. (Note: the Org’s Officers can still see you clearly in their own Admin view. They were the ones who recruited you anyway) Hidden: Nothing shows up in your Citizen Dossier. It’s like you were never part of it. The Org’s Member List shows a blank card where you would be. (Note: Again, the Org’s Officers can see you clearly in their Admin view)" If you don't see a name on your admin/members page, then there's something different going on.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 23, 2016 17:48
|
|