Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
Because how hard is it to lynch a scum, Woodhouse?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
Asphyxious...choking...clearly it was Cheryl.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

SirSamVimes posted:

I feel like people should post.

Yeah I got your post right here.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqapKJZbfQQ

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

Tommunist posted:

I'm here, don't know if i'll be here for deadline because i need to go down to the station for ~car being stolen~ related reasons.

why did you steal a car?

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
##vote exact science

only one post, it was a video, not much else to go on.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

Tommunist posted:

my friends ex jacked his car while we were at the pub last night.

wow rude.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

spacing in vienna posted:

I don't like it, either. A lurker hang is better than a no-hang, but it doesn't tell us anything, and we have three lurkers -- why EXAKT out of the three?

Alphabetical order, basically.


spacing in vienna posted:

There's more to go on in the thread in general. What do you think about busb's alignment? SSV's? Anidav?

busb feels townish, but it would depend pretty heavily on what turned up in a hypothetical andidav lynch. anidav always reads as scummy to me. no opinion on SSV

busb posted:

mate. no.
I'd rather vote someone trying not to create content but still trying to be visible in thread than a rando lurker hang which will leave us with nothing to go on Day2.


barely acceptable 'taking out the trash' case.


##vote anidav

take two??

fair point, we get little to no information off a lurker lynch.

##vote anidav

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
well, we have about 10 minutes and only 2/3 of the required votes are even in play. so that's a problem.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

TMMadman posted:

Everyone move to Exakt. Lurking has become a huge problem in games lately and the way to deal with it is unfortunately to make current games harder by making a statement and lynching lurkers early in the game.

##vote Exakt

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

spacing in vienna posted:

Wow, this post. If you guys want to lynch lurkers so badly, can we lynch this guy? Because this post.

yeah it's pretty suss but at least it's a post and vote.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
i think it's more valuable to stop shifting targets because we are five minutes from a no-lynch

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

spacing in vienna posted:

I don't understand. How does that make it any better? Showing up for a hi-and-bye vote on the vote leader is awful.

it is meaningful information - less blank space.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

iajanus posted:

Fine. ##vote EXAKT


TMMadman posted:

Not bold, doesn't count.

I saw that too, what the hell.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
Hey I have an exam today so I'm not going to be posting until it's over.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
Hello I'm out of exam, phone-posting on the train home. I'll read through the thread and try to form an opinion a bit later.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

Thanks! I feel like it went ok, but corporate law is a fucker.

EXAKT Science posted:

Bummer, I was hoping you'd be around because I like you for scum as well.

I am not a scum.

I don't like TMM jumping in to try and get a turbo/chain thing going on.

I especially don't like the way that combos with him voting for confirmed town busb.

##vote TMM

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

TMMadman posted:

It's not an OMGUS vote. Ken is legitimately being scummy with his vote and reasons.

He is directly implying that I knew busb was town when he says that I voted for confirmed town. I had no idea that busb was town yesterday, so saying that I voted for confirmed town is an insidious way to put the idea into other peoples heads that I knew busbs alignment.

I did not imply or otherwise that you knew about busb's status, merely that it was an unpleasant coincidence. You jumping down my throat in response is making me much happier about voting for you.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
My case on you was pretty slim, you made a much stronger case on yourself by reacting like a scalded cat.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
gently caress me dead.

not having a no lynch two days in a row.

TMMadman posted:

Seriously go read Kens history and you'll see he was all over the Exakt vote but today I'm somehow the bad guy for it in his mind. I think he's the best option today because his vote on me was garbage. And he hasn't supported it at all today.

this is an outright lie - I was suss at you for voting for busb day one, and then trying to get a turbo/chain at the start of day two.

Anidav is a bad player and would usually be a top lynch but this poo poo is just egregious.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

TMMadman posted:

Seriously can we all just agree to lynch Ken today? His original vote for me is pure garbage.

and wow, try to split the vote another way at half an hour from deadline based on OMGUS.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!

MysticalMachineGun posted:

Seriously he has 0 votes and there's 27 minutes to go, what is this

desperate squirming.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
on day one when they weren't around, as opposed to today when they've been active.

which has nothing to do with you voting for busb day one and then trying to get a turbo going on exact and iajanus at the start of this day. and then flipping the gently caress out about my vote for you, which has done pretty much all the damage to you.

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
rekt

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
At least I died doing what I loved. Getting shot.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

thatbastardken
Apr 23, 2010

A contract signed by a minor is not binding!
I thought I was going to be ok to claim d3 because I had an ace up my sleeve: the Red Kreigtober!

I used it n2, and went to bed all smug about my chances of surviving.

unfortunaetly it didn't do anything, and I died.

:shrug:

  • Locked thread