|
I shall fetch a rug.
|
#
¿
Oct 27, 2015 04:21
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 05:43 |
|
|
And no, Kenny Loggins, there's no way to make up for almost killing me over a briefcase full of what I can only assume is either plutonium or a human soul.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2015 14:50
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:I feel like people should post. It's not a competition, Sam!
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 04:01
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Archer is cool and good Kashuno is not. ##vote Kashuno
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
Kumbamontu posted:i thought there was at least another day left, the whole game has taken place over the weekend Yeah I did too. I forgot it's an Australian Monday afternoon deadline.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
busb posted:You loving ruineed it. ##vote assna Oh, okay, then I guess just pout! ##vote busb
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:47
|
|
|
I'm aroundish. Currently prepping dinner and will be making it soon, but the making involves mostly just stirring occasionally once it gets started.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:I am not scum. Also my phone has 9℅ charge so I won't be around it seems. I would vote SSV right now. What a convenient excuse that your phone has no charge. You were saying a while ago that you'd have to be on your phone, so why isn't it charged?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:47
|
|
|
Also, incidentally, I really hope that there is a character named Brett and that he is a lightning rod for N1.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:57
|
|
|
Tommunist posted:I'm here, don't know if i'll be here for deadline because i need to go down to the station for ~car being stolen~ related reasons. And pick up some caltrops while you are out.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:12
|
|
|
busb posted:why is my vote for anidav not counting? That's weird, it shows you voted for him and then immediately unvoted. Here, I'll try it. ##vote Anidav
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:14
|
|
|
Weird, my vote counts.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:14
|
|
|
I could get behind exact because she does tend to lurk a lot.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:17
|
|
|
In fact, why not. My vote on Anidav was just a test. ##vote Exakt
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:17
|
|
|
spacing in vienna posted:I don't like it, either. A lurker hang is better than a no-hang, but it doesn't tell us anything, and we have three lurkers -- why EXAKT out of the three? I would vote out any lurker at any point and that has always been my stance. D1 vote like this one are always just a gamble, so it might as well be someone who most likely isn't going to be posting in the future. This D1 has been very quiet, so none of the votes are really going to tell us anything.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
I can actually agree that it's weird of Anidav to come in and make a post that implies he is vanilla and then excuses himself from making any actual reads. ##vote Anidav This time it's a real vote, not a test vote.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
Anidav posted:What's there to read? There's no rabbit in the hat here. We have a conga line of lurkers, a stolen car and a vote stealer(?). Any vote we make is equally as useful as the previous. However having vocal people survive for day 2 is more useful as you can actually compare posts from previous days. A day 1 lurker is empty space and the less empty space there is the more likely we can paint scum into a corner. This is actually why I'm not against lynching lurkers on D1. Sure, it may make D2 (and possibly the rest of the game) slightly harder, but at the same time it does make it harder for scum to lurk through D1. So you know what, I'm going back to the lurker. ##vote Exakt
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
Everyone move to Exakt. Lurking has become a huge problem in games lately and the way to deal with it is unfortunately to make current games harder by making a statement and lynching lurkers early in the game.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:39
|
|
|
spacing in vienna posted:That doesn't help us win this actual game, which I would like to do. I would switch to iajanus, but I could very well hold this post against you if Exakt turns up scum.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:43
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:i think it's more valuable to stop shifting targets because we are five minutes from a no-lynch This is true too.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
Also, I'm glad Asiina and MachineGun were here early, but didn't vote.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Also, I'm glad Asiina and MachineGun were here early, but didn't vote. Oh wait, MachineGun just voted. 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
spacing in vienna posted:We just slammed onto EXAKT from Anidav in that much time, although nine's a stretch. 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
spacing in vienna posted:Honestly I feel like EXAKT is less likely to be scum because surely, a scumbro would have pointed him/her to the thread by now. But I'll ##vote EXAKT since it seems like that's the only viable option. It could be that they tried to get Exakt to the thread, but she is completely gone.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
iajanus posted:That was my theory; exakt looked less suss than Anidav so I voted with my conscience. Well why didn't you switch now so maybe we can get a lynch?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
iajanus posted:Fine. ##vote EXAKT Not bold, doesn't count.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
No! Not Shiroi Kabocha! I think we should go back to the Exakt lynch and if Exakt turns up scum, we lynch the hell out of iajanus for being her scumbuddy and preventing the D1 lynch.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 23:43
|
|
|
So yeah, I shouldn't forget to vote: ##vote Exakt
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 23:43
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Hahahahaha shut up with this trash Why? What's wrong with my plan? Are you trying to protect scum buddies?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 23:47
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:Immediately as the day starts you suggest a chain lynch? Yeah. We had a good lynch lined up on Exakt and iajanus prevented it. Whether it was simply a mistake or intentional is up in the air, so I'd rather lynch the lurker and use that information to make a real determination on iajanus. Just because I suggest a lynch order doesn't mean that's how it's going to play out.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 23:49
|
|
|
No I am not scum.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 23:50
|
|
|
And, of course, it should be noted that I'm willing to hold off on lynching Exakt if better targets present themselves. I don't think we should head straight to lynching iajanus because it could have been a simple error, so I'd rather lynch the person that isn't likely to show up at all.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 23:52
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:You are advocating a lurker turbo chain lynch one post in to the day Why shouldn't I be advocating for a lurker lynch when we are running 24 hour days? A lurker isn't going to do anything at all for the game.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:You are advocating a lurker turbo chain lynch one post in to the day Also, where do you get that I am suggesting turboing Exakt? Just because I'm saying that Exakt should be the lynch today doesn't mean I want it done fast.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 23:56
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Ffs d1 took place on a holiday weekend maybe exakt wasn't around maybe something happened, we shouldn't immediately jump on a quick lynch like this it's so anti town it hurts . We gain literally nothing rushing this We are running 24 hour days.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 3, 2015 00:00
|
|
|
Welcome to the game Ekaxt. ##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Nov 3, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Haha you're dumb No, I just provoke discussion. EXAKT Science posted:It was a terrible lynch for several reasons, hun. It was as good a lynch as any for that D1. Nobody had really done anything and you had made all of one post. I wasn't inclined to vote for anyone who was actively posting at that point, so why not vote the biggest lurker?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 3, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:lol coward Why? My vote was mostly predicated on you being a lurker. You are no longer a lurker, so the reason for my vote is no longer valid.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 3, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
Why are people thinking I wanted Exakt lynched immediately? Both SSV and Kash seem to think I wanted the lynch done in hours when that's just not the case. All I was doing was stating my opinion to start the day followed up with a vote. It's not like some kind of permanent vote that I can't move. Exakt has shown up and posted some, so I removed my vote. We have short days, so attacks and arguments are going to come faster than games that have 2-3 day deadlines. Why am I catching flak for making a quick argument and getting discussion started?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 3, 2015 01:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 05:43 |
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Yes, I agree with all this. The Anidav vote wasn't super-compelling, but the switch to EXAKT was apropos of nothing and too many people are jumping on it. And then today people are all about jumping back on to EXAKT without even analyzing how everythign went down yesterday. Granted I wasn't here when any of that went down, but readining back over it I can't get why that started. So you think Anidav is scum, but you're voting me because you think I so obviously swung the vote off him on D1? Even though I was completely willing to lynch him? I switched off him because he made a couple posts near the deadline and I agree with him here: Anidav posted:What's there to read? There's no rabbit in the hat here. We have a conga line of lurkers, a stolen car and a vote stealer(?). Any vote we make is equally as useful as the previous. However having vocal people survive for day 2 is more useful as you can actually compare posts from previous days. A day 1 lurker is empty space and the less empty space there is the more likely we can paint scum into a corner. So I moved my vote to Exakt, a person who had exactly one post. I would have switched back Anidav, but iajanus' drive by vote skeeved me out and reeked of scum jumping on an easy deadline vote. Even with his bad typing excuse, he still stinks of scum to me for his reluctance to move his vote towards the end and I'm still very suspicious of both Exakt and iajanus, but I'm giving them some slack for the moment. I could get behind the MMG vote as his jumping onto Exakt so quickly and then his cheerleading in the thread. He's been posting a few times, but it's nothing of substance and includes a list of people who voted for busb with no actual analysis. He's posting for the appearance and doesn't seem to want to put forth any opinions.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 3, 2015 04:30
|
|