Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
dougdrums
Feb 25, 2005
CLIENT REQUESTED ELECTRONIC FUNDING RECEIPT (FUNDS NOW)

Nalin posted:

In reality you'll just get a pin number in a text message.
this is gonna actually happen to me in five years when i forget the password to my wifi enabled medicine cabinet

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Big Witch Hat
Oct 28, 2020

Nalin posted:

In reality you'll just get a pin number in a text message.

Going through the pain of setting up a 90 character long password, two factor authentication, encryption keys, and so on only to get owned all the same because an overworked AT&T call center worker fell for social engineering.

cage-free egghead
Mar 8, 2004
The only 2FA EBay lets you use is either your phone number or you have to use their app. Can't use anything else. My regional bank has more 2fa options than they do.

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





xtal posted:

I didn't subscribe to Linux to post this, you don't need to buy any software, much less buy it more than once. Separately from that, storing your passwords in the cloud is a bad idea whether it's a subscription or not.

Weird how Linux hasn't solved this problem then. Huh.

xtal
Jan 9, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Try using WINE

Cup Runneth Over
Aug 8, 2009

She said life's
Too short to worry
Life's too long to wait
It's too short
Not to love everybody
Life's too long to hate


astral posted:

You can buy a standalone 1Password license.

For 7? I have one for 4 but was under the impression I'd need to start shelling out again to upgrade to 7

astral
Apr 26, 2004

Cup Runneth Over posted:

For 7? I have one for 4 but was under the impression I'd need to start shelling out again to upgrade to 7

Yes.

BlankSystemDaemon
Mar 13, 2009



Internet Explorer posted:

Complaining about this for a security product that needs constant maintenance is some galaxy brain poo poo.

The times of buying SOFTWARE VERSION 2.0 and being able to use it for a decade are over. Updates are critical and they cost money. Having people stuck at older versions is a massive risk and a huge burden for developers.

It's gone. Let it go.
I feel like there's a valid argument to be made that all software needs constant maintenance, it's just that the relationship between paying for it and getting it is at best correlative rather than a causative one.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

BlankSystemDaemon posted:

I feel like there's a valid argument to be made that all software needs constant maintenance, it's just that the relationship between paying for it and getting it is at best correlative rather than a causative one.

I mean the alternative is hoping random strangers on the Internet maintain it for you (very legitimate for many pieces of software!) or doing it yourself. It is not irrational to pay someone else to maintain software for you that is valuable to you.

some kinda jackal
Feb 25, 2003

 
 
I use iCloud Keychain syncing on all my fruit devices and I've yet to think of a single reason to switch to something else.

I'm sure someone here will tell me why I shouldn't, but it's free, does the job, and I get good value for my money :cool:

The only real downside is when I'm on a non-fruit machine or need to enter a password on my streaming box or something once every few months but I can deal with 30 seconds of fishing my phone out of my pocket.

RFC2324
Jun 7, 2012

http 418

Ynglaur posted:

I mean the alternative is hoping random strangers on the Internet maintain it for you (very legitimate for many pieces of software!) or doing it yourself. It is not irrational to pay someone else to maintain software for you that is valuable to you.

Plenty of software gets continual updates without a subscription model tho? Just for the screamingly obvious one, Windows.

Also almost everything else, at least for a few years after release.

Saying that the subscription model is required if you want security updates is complete bullshit that is only being said by people who want to increase profits, and by people who buy into that capitalist garbage

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





RFC2324 posted:

Plenty of software gets continual updates without a subscription model tho? Just for the screamingly obvious one, Windows.

Also almost everything else, at least for a few years after release.

Saying that the subscription model is required if you want security updates is complete bullshit that is only being said by people who want to increase profits, and by people who buy into that capitalist garbage

Yes, me, a person who definitely buys into that capitalist garbage.

Expecting someone to work for free, in a capitalist society, does not make you a paragon of virtue. It also goes a long way to make sure that only people who have the free time and another source of income can contribute. Windows is subsidized by Microsoft's other endeavors and their monopoly in most parts of the market. The same thing goes for something like iCloud Keychain.

Being mad about this is like being mad that childcare costs money and that food is not free. Should they be? Absolutely. If you want to fix that, then change the economic system. But living in a capitalist society and balking at the idea of paying someone for their labor doesn't make you a socialist, it makes you an rear end in a top hat.

We're talking about $3 a month here.

RFC2324
Jun 7, 2012

http 418

Internet Explorer posted:

Yes, me, a person who definitely buys into that capitalist garbage.

Expecting someone to work for free, in a capitalist society, does not make you a paragon of virtue. It also goes a long way to make sure that only people who have the free time and another source of income can contribute. Windows is subsidized by Microsoft's other endeavors and their monopoly in most parts of the market. The same thing goes for something like iCloud Keychain.

Being mad about this is like being mad that childcare costs money and that food is not free. Should they be? Absolutely. If you want to fix that, then change the economic system. But living in a capitalist society and balking at the idea of paying someone for their labor doesn't make you a socialist, it makes you an rear end in a top hat.

We're talking about $3 a month here.

Why is something that has always been part of the prepaid package suddenly not?

Its that simple. They are adding a subscription cost to a thing that has always before been part of the original purchase. That screams of someone sitting down and saying "we want more money in our quarterly, how can we squeeze that".
misunderstood their pricing, thought they sold as well as a subscription fee so you had to pay both. The last bit still applies.

And having my identity locked behind paying them for continuing access to my passwords bugs me more than a little.

Those are what made me go back to keepass after LastPass went to hell.

E: apologies, I may also be acting a bit hostile out of irl frustrations.

RFC2324 fucked around with this message at 15:52 on Oct 30, 2020

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





RFC2324 posted:

E: apologies, I may also be acting a bit hostile out of irl frustrations.

No worries. It's an interesting conversation none the less. Hope your day gets better.

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


RFC2324 posted:

Why is something that has always been part of the prepaid package suddenly not?

Its that simple. They are adding a subscription cost to a thing that has always before been part of the original purchase. That screams of someone sitting down and saying "we want more money in our quarterly, how can we squeeze that".
misunderstood their pricing, thought they sold as well as a subscription fee so you had to pay both. The last bit still applies.

And having my identity locked behind paying them for continuing access to my passwords bugs me more than a little.

Those are what made me go back to keepass after LastPass went to hell.

E: apologies, I may also be acting a bit hostile out of irl frustrations.

fwiw, 1pass gives you read access to your database indefinitely if you turn off your subscription

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


Martytoof posted:

I use iCloud Keychain syncing on all my fruit devices and I've yet to think of a single reason to switch to something else.

I'm sure someone here will tell me why I shouldn't, but it's free, does the job, and I get good value for my money :cool:

The only real downside is when I'm on a non-fruit machine or need to enter a password on my streaming box or something once every few months but I can deal with 30 seconds of fishing my phone out of my pocket.

Keychain is actually good, and the only real limitation is the one you mentioned.

RFC2324
Jun 7, 2012

http 418

The Fool posted:

fwiw, 1pass gives you read access to your database indefinitely if you turn off your subscription

*Reactivates subscription once every 90 days to cycle passwords*😁

Volmarias
Dec 31, 2002

EMAIL... THE INTERNET... SEARCH ENGINES...

CLAM DOWN posted:

Also this was prophetic lmao

Glad we're all still doing it too.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

RFC2324 posted:

E: apologies, I may also be acting a bit hostile out of irl frustrations.

All good. Life is frustrating and you raise some good points worth thinking about. Conversations like this are why I like SA. :shobon:

Impotence
Nov 8, 2010
Lipstick Apathy
tbh my one big thing about 'cloud' and 'security related' items is that while i'd be happy to purchase the software, i don't want to give them a card, i don't want billing details or email associated with my password manager

The Iron Rose
May 12, 2012

:minnie: Cat Army :minnie:

Biowarfare posted:

tbh my one big thing about 'cloud' and 'security related' items is that while i'd be happy to purchase the software, i don't want to give them a card, i don't want billing details or email associated with my password manager

Ironically, with the rise of stripe and wepay and other payment gateways, you never really hear about credit cards getting hacked anymore these days eh?

It’s all personal data instead which sells for more. Oh what a world.

Impotence
Nov 8, 2010
Lipstick Apathy

The Iron Rose posted:

Ironically, with the rise of stripe and wepay and other payment gateways, you never really hear about credit cards getting hacked anymore these days eh?

It’s all personal data instead which sells for more. Oh what a world.


the thing that bothers me about stripe's on-site integration is that you feasibly can't tell the difference between whether the data is going to stripe or to the vendor first party, and if stripe fails to load or loads slowly there's a nonzero chance it will just send the raw card details in a POST form directly to the underlying page. (in this case, I don't mean the stripe modal/iframe, they have a feature that just intercepts on-page selectors like <input name="card"> <input name="cvv"> and preventDefault()s them and sends its own ajax call)


another "fuckin comedy" thing is analytics services like those heatmap and session replay services that capture all input via js, including PII

Impotence fucked around with this message at 19:01 on Oct 30, 2020

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



This hunter biden DKIM stuff is wild and I'd love for any of your input on it, I can't make sense if it's real or not without spiraling into some Q zone conspiracy hole

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


cr0y posted:

This hunter biden DKIM stuff is wild and I'd love for any of your input on it, I can't make sense if it's real or not without spiraling into some Q zone conspiracy hole

A ten second google search shows me a bunch of journalists that don’t know how dkim works. Plus all the other hunter biden stuff that’s been debunked this week.

Do you have a specific question?

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


Oh. And dkim only ensures that an email came from a specific domain and doesn’t give a poo poo about email content or the individual sender.

Impotence
Nov 8, 2010
Lipstick Apathy

The Fool posted:

Oh. And dkim only ensures that an email came from a specific domain and doesn’t give a poo poo about email content or the individual sender.

SPF is domain. DKIM can sign/hash the body, headers in addition.

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


Hrm

leave my idiocy up as a testament to others

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1322008400994160640?s=19

It appears that this email is cryptographically sound, but it's just an email about getting coffee so not really that compromising. It seems like the angle is release one legitimate email and then a bunch of PDFs of the body of others hoping to ride the legitimacy of the first one to the news headlines? Idk, just thought you goons would find it interesting as I have been having to slap down this latest scandal all day from my brother in law 😒

Which is kind of stupid because the average american does not care if a damaging email has proper cryptographic signatures 🤷‍♀️

cr0y fucked around with this message at 20:25 on Oct 30, 2020

klosterdev
Oct 10, 2006

Na na na na na na na na Batman!
Just got three different emails from Yahoo in a row asking to confirm the login with a code

Time to change a password

RFC2324
Jun 7, 2012

http 418

klosterdev posted:

Just got three different emails from Yahoo in a row asking to confirm the login with a code

Time to change a password

It just occurred to me that my 25 year old yahoo whos security was established by a teenager in the 90s is the recovery account for my gmail, which is what most of my online identity verifies against for recovery.

What a loving weak link to have never have had compromised

Volmarias
Dec 31, 2002

EMAIL... THE INTERNET... SEARCH ENGINES...

RFC2324 posted:

It just occurred to me that my 25 year old yahoo whos security was established by a teenager in the 90s is the recovery account for my gmail, which is what most of my online identity verifies against for recovery.

What a loving weak link to have never have had compromised

If that idiot teenager ever reused that password, it's time to change it.

Heck, it's probably time to change it anyway.

RFC2324
Jun 7, 2012

http 418

Volmarias posted:

If that idiot teenager ever reused that password, it's time to change it.

Heck, it's probably time to change it anyway.

Also maybe point my recovery email somewhere less likely to be completely compromised lol

Happy Thread
Jul 10, 2005

by Fluffdaddy
Plaster Town Cop
What are your all's thoughts on how to safely convert new or used USB drives you've purchased into trustworthy boot drives or secure storage drives?

Even brand new drives seem like they could snitch on you to Big Brother. From the Vault 7 leaks, we know of several incidents of brand new products being sold with state-sponsored malware in them (Samsung TVs, various routers). For that reason, I distrust even brand new USB drives to not frequently be sold that way.

Here's a thorough article how any USB device, not just drives, could hack you in unexpected ways if the firmware itself is malicious:

https://www.howtogeek.com/203061/don%E2%80%99t-panic-but-all-usb-devices-have-a-massive-security-problem/
(found for me by someone in the Linux thread).

My point is, if firmware of a thumb drive can be malware, then attempting to securely wipe the drive as soon as you get it is of no use. The firmware could just inject things upon read/write, or worse, do some of the many other things mentioned in that article -- non-storage related hardware spoofing attacks, etc.

In this state of the world, is there ANY way to make a secure OS install thumb drive, or even a bootable OS on a stick, that you can trust not to have backdoor introduced by the firmware? A hazard that seemingly results from just buying the wrong USB drive, even brand new?

trashy owl
Aug 23, 2017

Happy Thread posted:

What are your all's thoughts on how to safely convert new or used USB drives you've purchased into trustworthy boot drives or secure storage drives?

Even brand new drives seem like they could snitch on you to Big Brother. From the Vault 7 leaks, we know of several incidents of brand new products being sold with state-sponsored malware in them (Samsung TVs, various routers). For that reason, I distrust even brand new USB drives to not frequently be sold that way.

Here's a thorough article how any USB device, not just drives, could hack you in unexpected ways if the firmware itself is malicious:

https://www.howtogeek.com/203061/don%E2%80%99t-panic-but-all-usb-devices-have-a-massive-security-problem/
(found for me by someone in the Linux thread).

My point is, if firmware of a thumb drive can be malware, then attempting to securely wipe the drive as soon as you get it is of no use. The firmware could just inject things upon read/write, or worse, do some of the many other things mentioned in that article -- non-storage related hardware spoofing attacks, etc.

In this state of the world, is there ANY way to make a secure OS install thumb drive, or even a bootable OS on a stick, that you can trust not to have backdoor introduced by the firmware? A hazard that seemingly results from just buying the wrong USB drive, even brand new?

Hello and thank you for your question! The answer is 'no' and probably also 'please re-evaluate your threat model'.

BlankSystemDaemon
Mar 13, 2009



Find an OS with a checksummed filesystem, a bootloader that can handle the FDE implemented by the OS, and where the FDE implements integrity verification.
FreeBSD with root on ZFS using GELI configured with AES-XTS or Camellia-CBC plus HMAC/SHA512, along with FreeBSDs loader.efi works well.

BlankSystemDaemon fucked around with this message at 12:05 on Oct 31, 2020

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?
Quick question for the thread. As an ordinary home user, is there anything particularly egregious with using Windows while logged in as an administrator on my personal laptop? General profile:

  • Not a government official, in a sensitive industry, etc.
  • What I consider normal, usual protections are in place: out-of-the-box Windows 10 security settings, BitLocker, Windows Firewall, Windows Defender, automatic updates, etc.
  • Chrome is the primary browser, with the only extension uBlock Origin with standard settings.
  • Home network runs Ubiquiti gear with updated firmware, etc.

I mean, I get that if GRU wants to pwn me they probably can. I'm trying to understand if there are really compelling reasons in 2020 for home users to have a separate administrator account setup on a personal Windows laptop.

BlankSystemDaemon
Mar 13, 2009



Do you need to run anything as an administrator? If not, why not make use of limited user access as an additional precaution.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

BlankSystemDaemon posted:

Do you need to run anything as an administrator? If not, why not make use of limited user access as an additional precaution.

It's for my wife's laptop. In the past I've set her up as a normal user, but things like Windows or various application updates sometimes require the administrator to login, and it's frustrating for her.

cage-free egghead
Mar 8, 2004

Ynglaur posted:

It's for my wife's laptop. In the past I've set her up as a normal user, but things like Windows or various application updates sometimes require the administrator to login, and it's frustrating for her.

You could just give her the password and have her input it as she needs. Only slightly safer than just having total admin control but it'll still give a reminder that "hey, you sure you wanna install this?"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Big Witch Hat
Oct 28, 2020

cage-free egghead posted:

You could just give her the password and have her input it as she needs. Only slightly safer than just having total admin control but it'll still give a reminder that "hey, you sure you wanna install this?"

Wouldn't that just be UAC with extra steps? For that matter, wouldn't relying on UAC be just fine given what the laptop is for? Unless Ynglaur is talking about the actual Administrator account, which would be insane.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply