|
i play
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2015 06:00
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 03:17 |
|
|
poo poo i misread the title and thought this had to do with pizza rolls
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2015 20:11
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:The optimal strategy is to just vote for whomever, without any concern for organization, right? as long as you arent voting for my organization (hot pockets)
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2015 20:24
|
|
|
canadian beer is just american beer with a moose on the bottle
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
or a lovely leaf
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
beer owns
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2015 22:12
|
|
|
i havnt
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2015 22:15
|
|
|
wow most uncouth
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
same
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2015 01:06
|
|
|
someone from the majority alliance tell me who to vote, and then use me to turn on your peers
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2015 01:08
|
|
|
remember the simpsons when grandpa simpson was in a tontine with mr burns, why was mr burns so desperate for that treasure, he was rich, and why did grandpa simpson involve a elementry school child in the tontine adventure, that seems irresponsible
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:Someone form an alliance with me instead. I'm trustworthy! they can bring us both on board why are you so selfish
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
Meinberg should be the unanimous vote to die for his rude tude
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
Thats very triggering to me
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2015 01:17
|
|
|
Meinberg has to die for his rudeness
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2015 14:41
|
|
|
Also you've activated my trap card
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2015 14:44
|
|
|
Id also like to thank everyone who advised me of Meinbergs deceitful plans
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2015 14:47
|
|
|
shut up worm food
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2015 15:51
|
|
|
Is deadline in 6 hours or 30 hours?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2015 00:18
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Midnight Saturday, sorry. Yah but does that mean tonight at 12 its saturday and midnight or its friday and midnight even though its technically saturday
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Way to pick the only confusing time possible somber I used to make deadlines in mafia games at 11:59PM to avoid that confusion
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2015 00:38
|
|
|
 Kashuno posted:
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2015 21:57
|
|
|
jon joe posted:That's because you died before you could become dishonorable. he died trying to murder me, the one with no blood on his hands
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2015 22:02
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:
self defense bitch
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2015 22:08
|
|
|
Just my opinion, but I really feel like being allowed to divy out the gold after a round very much goes against the idea of this game. Did JJ see the values on the gold before it was divied out? Also I think it will really make this game drag on way past the point of being fun
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 14:52
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Just my opinion, but I really feel like being allowed to divy out the gold after a round very much goes against the idea of this game. Did JJ see the values on the gold before it was divied out? To elaborate on this a bit, the game is clearly set up as a game of deception and distrust, and private information that no one else is privy to, as well as your classic Prisoners Dilema to end a standoff. The game also features a catchup mechanic in that distrust should be build up among people betraying each other, and players do not know the ammount of points each other have, so players would be less inclined to let a player with bricks have the opportunity to win multiple rounds. Allowing players to redistribute bricks takes away the "secret" of which bricks does a player have so points are more known to a select few, but also encourages a group to completely single out the rest of the game, and run the show together, because no one is ever in a position to win until very late game when half of the game has 3-5 bricks and the other half is just the minority throughout the game. I really think we should go back to day 1 and redo the prisoners dilema portion of it, or if not, take away the bricks and redistribute 4 random bricks to Jon Joe as the round winner.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 16:28
|
|
|
I mean at this point this isnt the game that I signed up to play, and this house rule makes the game more frustrating than fun
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 16:42
|
|
|
feels more like a lovely episode of Liar Game than a tontine
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 16:43
|
|
|
FoxTerrier posted:Jake the gold distribution was OK'd by the GM. If you want to see about forbidding such moves in future rounds then OK, but canceling or re-doing actions that have already taken place with GM approval would be not cool (at all). And to comment on this, I think it would be way less cool to change the rule but to allow round 1s result to still exist as it is, and even less cool to continue with this rule in place at all.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 16:51
|
|
|
The fact of the matter is you 4 should have been forced to conspire against each other last round and incite distrust in each other, and being allowed to team up and split the bricks takes this aspect away and makes it far easier for you all to work together this round, and future rounds.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 16:57
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 03:17 |
|
|
Opopanax posted:Except that JJ could have totally betrayed them, so there's still that element Except that at this point in the game it is very against his best interest to do so. This strategy lets a group of players get a headstart before they ever need to work against each other.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2015 17:02
|
|