|
I hate gnomes, sign me up.
|
#
¿
Dec 29, 2015 03:06
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 23:12 |
|
|
I'll play all the remaining roles as well
|
|
#
¿
Dec 29, 2015 03:08
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:I'd love to host a C9 game where Punt is all 9 players. game of the year right here.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 29, 2015 14:10
|
|
|
Jake is both cool and good imo
|
|
#
¿
Dec 30, 2015 21:48
|
|
|
I'm canadian
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
Asiina confirmed anal dildo expert. Took a lot of self-control to not call you assina there.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
also I'm going to bed so don't start the game.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
kink shaming's my kink you prude
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2015 02:13
|
|
|
he doesn't need a pr for that
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2015 03:04
|
|
|
gnome-firming I'm off travelling for new year's so expect some half-arsed phone posting at best. Tommunist posted:scum slip feeling this dude right out the gate.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2015 10:12
|
|
|
Tommunist posted:I'll feel you That is exactly the response I was hoping for 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2015 10:21
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Tomm is always scum Can't spell scum without the word fuckboi! No wait I hosed that up
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2015 10:24
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I like Gnome Chomsky Scum claim spotted go back to Siberia ufucking pinko ##vote opoputist
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2015 18:20
|
|
|
What kind of a maniac puts a deadline on new years day? sorry/notsorry etc.Murmur Twin posted:My opinion hasn't really changed. Also, the vague word choice above ("similar reasons to yesterday" as opposed to "for scumclaiming") makes me think EXAKT is constructing a lie instead of sharing an honest opinion. Why does vagueness make it more likely to be deceit in this scenario? Are you implying he's hoping that the ambiguity will lead people to think his reasons are better than they are or something?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 15:25
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:~tone~ I dunno what you are trying to argue here.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
That multiple vote flip onto bigup after Exakt claimed is utter bs. I don't buy bigup as scum and would happily vote any of those clowns. Not too impressed with the push on exakt either as it happens and since it turns out there's a common element: Kashuno posted:HMMMMM THIS SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE I KNOW Kashuno posted:##vote dj If nothing else I can't have this distraction around anymore,. I'm feeling pretty confident this is the right course of action: ##vote kash
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 11:36
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:The common element is I voted both people and am therefore scum? Pls It's a pattern of shifty voting practices, thank you very much. The bigup vote all but admits you don't think he's scum but is acting like your actions are justified anyway and the other is a night-kill spec related meta case, on a person you've, in the height of irony, also attacked for pursuing bad cases. I don't see this as town behaviour therefore yes, scum. thnx
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 13:23
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:I have voted to kill people I don't think are scum before to remove distractions from the game I don't see how this is much different Are you asking me to accept your self-meta?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 13:36
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Just stating a fact I don't actually know it's a fact though.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 13:37
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:Is there a specific reason you don't buy BigUp as scum? Like to me his alignment is a coin flip and I'm curious if there's something I'm missing. The way he doesn't give a gently caress and the fact most of the cases against him are fundamentally arguments from annoyance rather than anything else. It's almost never the person you really want it to be and he's "that guy".
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 15:47
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:e+ or jake, both for reasons previously stated Is there anything more to the jake reasoning than he made a bad vote on you?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 21:15
|
|
|
totino boy posted:i would vote for tommunist or punt because they are being very snipey and distancing from interactions I don't really know what you mean by this so will assume it's scum talk for I intimidate you with my vast mafia prowess.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 22:52
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:punt who besides me is giving you scum vibes? Well, Murmur Twin posted:I agree with this statement, in that my failure to prevent a no-lynch is more incriminating than my having a serious tone on D1 when I made a case. This post by murmur pinged me, it seems weird and wrong logic-ed, like, who assured in their own towniness thinks their own behaviour is incriminating? And attacking exakt cos the argument she came up with that may not even have occurred to him until pointed out by her is better than his seems really odd. Otherwise I'd consider voting anyone who used the word distraction in a vote of theirs but I've not got a huge amount of strong feelings past that other than derp talked smack about me so he's deffo a buster. Is buster a thing people still say?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
Chic Trombone posted:Anyways I have somewhere to be soon and don't have enough time to catch up (and won't be around at deadline either) so I'm gonna drop a ##vote bigup and post more d3. sorry folks!! Two straight (game) days of nothing but dropping contentless votes on the voteleader when the deadline nears, there's no way chic isn't lurker-scum. ##vote chic
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2016 23:35
|
|
|
I'm not a fan of the votes on Jake he seems like he's on the level to me and I'd buy kash's claim too.Murmur Twin posted:##vote imgay However I really dislike this vote, the justification seems abstracted, vague and not even directly related to whether imgay's alignment is town or scum. ##vote murmur twin
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 13:55
|
|
|
Asiina posted:So do you agree with Jake? Do you think I'm scum? Do you think he's logical but wrong? What does on the level mean? It means I think he's town fundamentally - I not only agree with a lot of what jake has said but even when I don't, it seems logically consistent and genuine. If I thought you were scum I'd have led with that and voted you.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 17:31
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Which of his opinions do you agree with, specifically? I didn't think specifics would be all that interesting but I've agreed with what he's been saying regarding bigup and "distractions", his position on kash d2, his position on chic, his position on scumclaiming being a nulltell and probably some other stuff I've forgotten.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 18:24
|
|
|
Bigup DJ posted:Exakt Science - claimed doctor Do you think Kash is lying because he's scum?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 13:02
|
|
|
ok I'm here until deadline.EXAKT Science posted:##vote Kashuno how rude. Kashuno posted:people with investigative abilites Why would you be looking for them instead of scum?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 02:09
|
|
|
Currently rereading
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 03:06
|
|
|
##vote bigup dj
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 03:44
|
|
|
I've become everything I hate about mafia. While I'd say it's fairly clear from the flavour that imgay was the target based on the use of also in reference to asiina's death, I don't understand why tomm would tell such a lie what do the people voting him think he was trying to gain by making that claim?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2016 16:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 23:12 |
|
|
thanks BK, thanks all, sorry all for lurking so hard I really didn't wanna play so cheaply for my scum game but a lack of time and sleep deprivation left me without the energy to give it my all. Was somber a x-shot BP or would e+'s dayvig have failed? Cos that would have been a hilarious falling at the last hurdle...
|
|
#
¿
Jan 19, 2016 23:52
|
|