|
Hello
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 03:37 |
|
|
Ur a wizard arry
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
HERE WE BELONG BORN TO BE KINGS PRINCES OF THE UNIVERSE
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
I'm home now. Let the rumbling begin. In your next post, please force yourself to analyze at least one post of another player and say what it says about that player's alignment.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
WeLandedOnTheMoon! posted:Why not assume that you actually looked scummy jumping in as a second vote on a joke vote train and just chill? Why immediately jump to a defense by stating an obvious fact? WeLandedOnTheMoon! posted:Remind us that Quandary is MOD-CONFIRMED-TOWN-KING again please. I think this overreaction is a town tell. I can't decide whether Moon is trying to kickstart the game or legitimately thinks he has something here, but the fact that he's throwing his neck out immediately is a town tell.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:WeLandedOntheMoon is way too aggressive for this early in the game. I feel like he's trying his darnedest to appear townie, without actually being townie. Like what with how ready he is to claim that joke phase is over, while it seemed pretty clear that jokephase was still going. He's not in tune with the vibe that the town is putting down, and that's very probably because he's not town. Yeah, I have the exact opposite read.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:WeLandedOntheMoon is way too aggressive for this early in the game. I feel like he's trying his darnedest to appear townie, without actually being townie. Like what with how ready he is to claim that joke phase is over, while it seemed pretty clear that jokephase was still going. He's not in tune with the vibe that the town is putting down, and that's very probably because he's not town. I feel like this is the easy scum response to what Moon is doing. ##vote Meinberg
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:This post is trying to look like it's creating content, without any content in the post itself. Kind of scummy, unless there is more effort coming in the immediate future. I assumed this was a rude joke. Was this serious?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 18:41
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Sure I'll analyze this post of merk's. This post was made in an effort to seem like he's contributing to scum hunting without actually providing any content of his own. Even after this, his posts are mostly calling other people townie which is an easy way to look like you're participating without really saying anything AnonymousNarcotics posted:Oh forgot this part. ##vote merk As other have said, you didn't look at the posts I made immediately after my request which do exactly what I was asking the thread to do. Why not? Now that you've been pointed to these posts (by more than one person), what do you think they say about my alignment? Also, what do you think of Meinberg's read on Moon?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 18:43
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Merk made a post that was an attempt to be seen scum hunting without actually scum hunting. This might be a fair analysis for one of my posts in isolation, but this fails to appreciate that post in context of the two posts after it. It's concerning that you're playing this tune even after multiple people have pointed this out. So I'm going to ask you directly: How do my posts analyzing Moon and Meinberg impact your read of my alignment?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 18:45
|
|
|
The Lord of Hats posted:I mean, unless you're incredibly confident in your read, you're more likely to hit town than scum, and using it "Just because" is not incredibly compelling. How does this help us determine anyone's alignment?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
The Lord of Hats posted:If you're just going to say "Yeah, I'm going to probably actively sabotage my team because YOLO", you're going to have to lay out a little more explanation than "I have reasons okay?" I should've read this post before I asked the question. How is what he's doing scummy? Please explain this vote more.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
Atoramos posted:ughh I lost internet immediately after that post. I want to highlight to everyone that this post by Atoramos does a great job of sitting on the fence in the whole Moon, Vimes, Narc, and merk discussion so far today. There are outs to vote literally every single one of us in this post that he can build for later.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 18:48
|
|
|
I did misread the Atoramos post. He doesn't put out an option to vote me later with it.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 04:35
|
|
|
YO, WHAT DO PEOPLE THINK ABOUT MEINBERG'S READ ON MOON?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 04:36
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:WeLandedOntheMoon is way too aggressive for this early in the game. I feel like he's trying his darnedest to appear townie, without actually being townie. Like what with how ready he is to claim that joke phase is over, while it seemed pretty clear that jokephase was still going. He's not in tune with the vibe that the town is putting down, and that's very probably because he's not town. Here it is.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 04:36
|
|
|
Note: He doesn't vote Moon there.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 04:37
|
|
|
merk posted:This might be a fair analysis for one of my posts in isolation, but this fails to appreciate that post in context of the two posts after it. It's concerning that you're playing this tune even after multiple people have pointed this out. ##vote AnonymousNarcotics
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 18:33
|
|
|
Vote is staying. That feels off.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
Yeah, I think ANarc is a good lynch. Is there any benefit at all to lynching before deadline?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 22:55
|
|
|
Ok, here I am. It's been a rough few days. Haven't participated as much as I wanted yet. Anyone have anything I should look at immediately? Otherwise I'm just going to dive in.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:00
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:You don't know me, I'm always whining when I get picked on as town. It actually turned me off playing mafia for awhile. Now I'm remembering why. Tell us who you think is scum and why that person is scum. Your vote is on me, and you still haven't explained it very well at all. You also haven't re-analyzed my new content.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:02
|
|
|
King of Bleh posted:This is not the first time this game you've declined to engage in actual discussion bc you're too cool to play the game. BottleKnight for my #3 candidate. Who is your #2 candidate?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:05
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  SirSamVimes (4): WeLandedOnTheMoon!, imgay, AnonymousNarcotics (4): tuckfard, BottleKnight (3): imgay, fits, tuckfard merk (1): The Ninth Layer, AnonymousNarcotics, The Lord of Hats (1): Opopanax Quandary (1): Jose Valasquez, SirSamVimes, Meinberg (1): merk, tuckfard (1): QuoProQuid, Sinistral, BottleKnight, Opopanax (1): BottleKnight imgay (0): Sinistral, WeLandedOnTheMoon! (0): kaschei, tuckfard, Verr (0): QuoProQuid, Sinistral (0): imgay, tuckfard, King of Bleh, QuoProQuid (0): King of Bleh, CCKeane (0): QuoProQuid, chaoslord (0): fits, Not Voting (8): kaschei, Meinberg, Quandary, SirSamVimes, Spoonsy, The Lord of Hats, Tremendous Taste, VerrWith 25 alive, it's 13 votes to lynch. The current deadline is January 11th, 2016 at 8 p.m. EST -- that's in about 1 day, 8 hours.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:How do we know that Moon is telling the truth that he targeted someone? I don't understand this vote.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:07
|
|
|
Puntification posted:Seems unlikely scum would do it so openly and honestly, so I feel like effectively you're making excuses to vote town and not for the first time, even if the first was allegedly a "joke". Good enough for a starting punt imo ##vote ssv Compare it to this vote right before it, which I understand and think is pretty good.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:07
|
|
|
imgay posted:bing bang boog whose ready to play the fued Who do you think is scum now?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
fits posted:your original vote on tuckfard is poo poo. Looking back, I think this was a good vote at the time and mostly ignored by the thread. Everyone should go back and read fits' post here.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
fits posted:bottle knights original vote on tuckfard that im talking about; it feels like hes jumping in trying to be super pro townie early in the game (it was bks third post, but all within a few minutes) jumping on tuckfard posts that earlier uppage other people already jumped on. it felt like cheap and easy content and now hes coasting on it with the "well i still like that vote" bullshit Further justification here.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:So I think ##vote meinberg is the scum. Merk nailed it when they voted for Meinberg after that bad post. I just can't believe he didn't get more votes outside of merk. And even then merk has since felt they need to move their vote elsewhere. But seriously, just look at how many people have read meinberg's content and more or less said it was scummy: The Meinberg case is a good one, but he's not here. I find it unlikely that we actually lynch him with him being gone the whole weekend. At this point I'm content to let him coast today and come back to this point tomorrow if he's still around. Puntification posted:Do you mean KoB's vote on sinistral here? No, your vote on SSV I think is good.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Hey, that's a real bad post you got there What is the Opo gut telling you?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:14
|
|
|
This is my working list: Anon Meinberg SSV / Bottleknight I might build a case on Anon here. Going to see if my read changes while I try to do that.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:14
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Merk, what's your feel on bleh, especially with regard to him "defending" you (from anarc, I think)? I'm concerned that he's playing a present scum game. He's posting a lot without saying all that much. It's why I want more information on his #2 candidate, whoever that is. There's no way I lynch him on day 1 for that though.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
Full disclosure: I'm likely voting ANarc through deadline unless she comes back with some really good content about alignment.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 17:23
|
|
|
Front line please.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
imgay posted:I don't think Anarc scum, just bewildered. How'd you arrive at this read?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 17:57
|
|
|
Jose Valasquez posted:I'm definitely not drunk posting but here's a picture of me putting furniture together right now This makes me want to drink.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2016 03:03
|
|
|
Hello I can't post at work so I'll be on my phone until I get home.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 13, 2016 21:13
|
|
|
What should I do on this fine day?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 01:42
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 03:37 |
|
|
Capps who did you replace
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 01:43
|
|