|
I'm a wimpy little ranged dude. I am about as good in a fistfight as helen keller. I have very limited out of battle usage, despite my ~*charismatic personality*~ when this war of ours is over, I hope to become a landowner.
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 01:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 21:15 |
|
|
BabeLiker90 posted:##vote Podima ugh, i asked to be in the cool people thread. ##vote BabeLiker90
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 02:51
|
|
|
A likely story... you probably don't even know their fave Spice Girl.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 03:35
|
|
|
^^^^ I'm having a hard time with my joke vote, knowing I could joke vote here instead. gently caress. Everybody knows Ginger is where it's at.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
Gonna just work my way through the thread in a chronological order. 100YrsofAttitude posted:##vote doktor per You could just post better? Forgoing your pointless joke vote? Thank you. That's a fair point. Last evening before crashing I really didn't like that people were joining up on BabeLiker for sleights I did not sense. Would have put in the effort to ##unvote had I feared any real danger to them. Who I must admit has become cooler than me ITT.  Now for reference, my read on the Podima vote was non-serious, but BabeLiker was clearly being hypocritical. I found it funny in a rude sort of way. I still don't have a strong enough read of anyone to want to really go all in on serious vote. (I'll be refraining from using my vote till I mean it from now on.) Podima posted:Doktor Per has contributed one joke vote and no actual content while trying to explicitly stay out of battle: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3759143&userid=111306 You have already been admonished for reading comprehension, I'll spare you the repeat. I feel there's more responsibility on Scum players (closely knit society that can gently caress one another over.) so it was the side I mentally prepared for joining. (Also hoping for scum insight as I most likely would be town) I reached the conclusion that Scum would always want to be in battle, in the rear guard. That way they can potentially attack any team member and minimum accidental friendly fire. So I assume many scum would claim "ranged characters" to just obliterate the front line, or cripple their ranged capabilities with a knife to the neck. Now Scum are about 5-7 players and only three spots in each row. So filling a team with scum seems unlikely (though awesome), and thus we should assume that it's best to avoid putting scum altogether in battle, unless you can fill your own team with scum completely. Which is a highly unlikely scenario. Although this could work in towns' advantage if the FRONT LINES are filled 100% with Scum, making them incapable of killing the ranged Townies. ~~~~~~~~ That stuff about battle did not help scum hunt, I admit. I want to believe that the town catapult is real, and I feel as if I've only seen about 12-14 names in the thread. Counting Team Mascot Venom Soag.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2016 07:37
|
|
|
OK, gonna give a few impressions, of people I feel I have had the least sense for after a re-read. Granted, I know none of you. Dominoes: At first they didn't ping me at all, they're asking questions, when they posts they are engaging the thread, but never ever gives up any sort of opinion. Seems like an experienced Mafia player judging by the observations and inquiries, but that being given, I would assume more insight and opinions. There are opinions in the posts, but only other people's being restated. Seems odd. lxt: 90% Jokepost stuff that turns into a hissy fit that's as inane as inane gets. I blame no one involved. Ixtlilton posted:Hi I'm here in the thread posting. The same story could be said about f_v. VivaNova: I like what I've seen so far. Good questioning, sensible about differing perspectives. Getting good vibes. [b]Tomm:[b] The claim makes me want to believe. I don't see a scum benefit to it. ~~~~ I'll check out more later, and be active in the thread. My brain's been addled by opiates all weekend, but I'm hoping the need for them will pass soon. Pre-edit: Gameerofthegame: Excellent! I was thinking about asking someone who's reading the other thread, to determine who to attack.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 03:06
|
|
|
Ixtlilton posted:I have opinions on at least two players and I've engaged with the thread, what's your definition of content? Those opinions seemed to be formed before you entered the game. A part of the dance of tradition. Just click your own question mark and it becomes quite apparent. This is Rock Houses speaking.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 04:32
|
|
|
Mafia Edit: *Glass Houses
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 04:34
|
|
|
Yeah, I now feel comfortable to ##vote Ixtlilton
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:56
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Doktor, why choose Ixt as someone who has posted no content? Aren't there lots of other players who fall into that category? Absolutely, me included. Lxt I chose because I remembered their avatar, but could not remember anything but "ugh, please stop this train." Day one. Now granted the players I took an isolated second look at, were almost randomly picked. (Tithin is confusing me just because of the Darling Roundabout) I would love for Catapult Chic to be more present, but having been homeless and struggling to get internet I would personally err on the more sympathetic side of regaining internet. For today. But it's not looking too hot. Also, I wanted to check for my impression of people. I feel that it's improper with only two posts, one of which is "I just got net again."
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 10:01
|
|
|
tithin posted:
I usually remember things via avatars. I know it's out of your hands. This must be doubly frustrating for you
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 10:24
|
|
|
Is babeliker some sort of a scum smokebomb?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 09:29
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:How do you mean? "Guys, I'm a catapult, whom should I shoot? I can only do it day one so please be quick." Then with less than 24 hours to end of D1, "nvm, i was wrong." Just looks super weird. Super duper weird, I can't think of a GOOD reason for that whole thing, what I can think of, are BAD reasons. Especially with the Rarity discussion that was going on. Seemed like an almost intentional derail. Is Charismatic a thing in Mafia? I did not know, I just put that there because statistically speaking, I'm not the least charming person on the team, judging by my character sheet. I only have a singular vote. I promise.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 11:40
|
|
|
The more you know. Bad reasons I can think of are Fishing for Information regarding town that it would hurt to lose, try to get Max into marking town in the other thread. Maybe I'm dumb. Since the info is out, and I tried to read all the rules and how the non-mafia part of this, the Charisma bit was news to me. You say you are a front line fighter. So I am to understand you are a highly charismatic one?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 12:05
|
|
|
Anyway, it's getting down to the wire, been on a date most of the night, and will probably go to sleep in the next few hours. Going to read over the top Lynchtenders before I sleep, and throw my vote on the one I feel the worst about.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 12:07
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:You may want to read the rules again if you can because charisma is not what makes a frontline fighter that'd mainly be Might and probably Stamina. If I knew about Charisma is because I read the rules.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 13:42
|
|
|
I reread things. TMM's evolutionary tract of rage seemed natural. I've seen similar behavior in people, it was almost gradual (which is why people may not have spotted the shift.) I would be inclined to believe it as genuine, but it seems strange to maintain this level of anger for such a long time and then repeatedly subject oneself to it if it always turns out the same for them. I was a lot less suspicious until I wrote this out. I like what Rarity has been putting out. Doing so made me note times and such better, I often peruse the little question marks to read a single individual, but I'm experiencing the downfalls of viewing them in a vacuum. I could not see anything proper to support TMM's claim of Rarity 'gunning for him from the start.' It also let me see this, in reverse chronological order: Dominoes posted:I've cooled on you a bit, in case you're curious; I may have been misinterpreting your posting style. Rarity and King following suit was a hint. Dominoes posted:I think Rasc is likely scum. I'll lay a vote down once I've decided he's still the most likely, compared to a few others. He''s consistently posted commentary on not-so-relevant things. Need to lie down, take some pills. Going to try not to fall asleep and check out some more people, before I throw down my pre-slumber vote. I'm guessing CapitalistPig og Chic Trombone are getting replaced, unless a miracle happens. Does not bode well for D2.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 15:03
|
|
|
I found myself agreeing with what Gwyn was saying. I was about to quote Kash when I saw they had already done so. Down to the popular vote statement, but that might be what I've observed as being a universal rule of "worst outcome of D1 is no lynch."
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 15:29
|
|
|
I know I'm unlikely to be chosen, but I would like to fight in the rear. I believe I can be of service.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 16:58
|
|
|
I'm about to pass out. I'd be much keener on ending the pizza party than lynching TMM via catapult. For reasons stated previously. ##vote Dominoes
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
wow meds wore off at the beszt / wotrst time. i'll probs be around til hammertime. in case i need to move my vote. i look forward to yuor case rarity.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
I'm game to throw Rarity down. Will wait till closer to the deeadline.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2016 00:29
|
|
|
We are at 11-8 with 80 minutes to go.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2016 01:17
|
|
|
i've been having a prettty hard time forming coherent sentences. I'm not operating on a lot of sleep. But that being said, I've made my feelings on Dominoes clear, and I want to avoid a no-lynch. Which seems unlikely now so maybe I should just go back to sleep.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2016 01:35
|
|
|
Catachic was a typo. Couldn't remebmer her name offhand correctly.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
yes a person ive nerver talked to before and didnt know and i butchered the name. havent you ever met someone named jim and you call them john?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2016 01:41
|
|
|
4 hours prior:Dominoes posted:I spoke of effort to do it properly. least hepful vote. now we are at fukcing 10-10 with 3 votes we have no way of knowing if theyll turn up
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
ye will be missed ##vote rarity
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
venom snug took me itno his box and taught me a few techniqes
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
a phiolsophical view would say that the lack of content itslef was cotnent
|
|
#
¿
Jan 13, 2016 01:45
|
|
|
The battle may have been inconclusive, but we certainly did more damage. Go us! I think that the assumption that we got a no scum group fighting, would be the most likely outcome.Max posted:This applies to everyone. I have a pretty good feeling about them. Have been rather helpful throughout.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
exAkt also supsiciously has been abscent since combat resalts.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 06:21
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Are you off the meds now/feeling better?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 06:24
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Awesome. Glad to hear it! Exakt, comes quickly to mind. Would actually love for Exakt to comment if Dominoes D1 had me suspicious (obviously), but has been constructive since then. So not really relevant to the list. TMM, I find suspect. There's just so much posting, that's inane and banal. And keeps it up despite self-awareness. I find it hard to believe that it's sincere posting. Babeliker's claim I find super duper suspect. Their posting I can't get a good read on. But what bothers me is the aspect of the claim that will likely keep 'em off the battlefield, sure (but thus free to do the NK), but once they'd be put on the battlefield "out of necessity" it would be around the time where Max would become vulnerable. It bothers me.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 07:57
|
|
|
I'll have you know I opted all the way in on ranged! I opted out of melee, because I suck at it, but stick me in the front lines if you want me to take a shots at their rear. I could probably take a round there and yet fight another day.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 14:54
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Doktor Per The main thing that irks me there is the claim. I didn't plant a vote as I wanted someone else, more experienced in these games to provide input. This was a scenario that I pictured, as I found it odd to have a non combatant role. If there's precedent or it's normal, these suspicions would be moot. I didn't want to look stupid.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 19:38
|
|
If you find diqnol scummier than the rest, why not make it the focus? Why not vote?
|
gently caress it ##vote: TMM going to bed.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 19:52
|
|
|
Doktor Per posted:I'm a wimpy little ranged dude. I am about as good in a fistfight as helen keller. I have very limited out of battle usage, despite my ~*charismatic personality*~ How hard is it to loving understand fistfight? I do ranged damage, though I hypothetically can do a melee attack, it's not going to be effective. I'd be surprised if the opposition felt it. I'd love to get into a fight and I would honestly prefer to die on the frontlines, over being lynched and thus costing us a good soldier. (I wouldn't say good scumhunter, seeing as I see town in every corner.)
|
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:a. What is your preferred pronoun? I keep thinking of Dok as a female and getting confused B. I played those two games AGES ago, and once played a game of werewolf where I got NK'd Night 1. That's pretty much it. Ixtlilton posted:Doktor Per played up how on pills they were with these posts: I made one post where I was genuinely too hosed up too even type properly, Birdstrike had a positive reaction to it. I decided to play it up, since it seemed fun and then it turned into too much work to continue. It also helped that most of that time I was superbly wrecked.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2016 05:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 21:15 |
|
|
^^^ Those tats look baller. ~~~ The game isn't over till Quandary is in the ground, right? Kash's first comment of the day is utterly and completely bizarre. I just woke up, and will post further thoughts when I'm more sentient. I find it very hard to disagree with the Kash, Tith, Dom, Dok, Bow list even though I'm on it.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 18, 2016 10:15
|
|