Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
How many quarters after Q1 2016 till Marissa Mayer is unemployed?
1 or fewer
2
4
Her job is guaranteed; what are you even talking about?
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Ulta
Oct 3, 2006

Snail on my head ready to go.
The blockchain doesn’t solve this problem. A distributed system will only stay that way as long as people are interested in maintaining it (either through mining coin which means it gets progressively expensive to maintain medical records or inflationary pressure means system periodically disappear) or it fractures and fails like streaming provider have. Either way someone is going to lose their medical records. Or you have a centralized government maintain records cheaply in a sql (or if your feeling fancy nosql) database.

e: gently caress it, a lovely excel spreadsheet would be better than blockchain

Ulta fucked around with this message at 04:14 on Dec 14, 2021

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ulta
Oct 3, 2006

Snail on my head ready to go.

Nothingtoseehere posted:

Some carbon offsetting is worthwhile/useful, but I doubt that project with a fancy API call is one of them.

Also, the majority of CO2 emissions are absorbed into the oceans, not trees. More trees still helps, but there's a vast difference between protected natural woodland and planting a bunch of lumber for harvesting.

BRB starting a carbon offset company that partners with a saltwater pool installer that promises to plant oceans

Ulta
Oct 3, 2006

Snail on my head ready to go.
If it’s true, that’s a classic case of only testing “sunny day” scenarios and/or rely on line coverage for your unit test. Code bugs are like real bugs, if you see one, there’s many more hiding.

Ulta
Oct 3, 2006

Snail on my head ready to go.
For further ridiculousness on the “code is law” folks, most people don’t realize that compilers are also non-trivial code and contain bugs. In fact, a significant security vulnerability people don’t talk about because there isn’t much you can do about it is a intentionally compromised compiler. Review a GitHub all you want, if you compile it with the wrong compiler, and your out of luck. Let’s say you find a way to fully trust you compiler. Do you trust the silicon that made your box? It’s easy enough to create a vulnerability in your hardware for your running software. Let’s say you make all the chips yourself. Do you trust the wires you connect to? That’s a mistake. People are already putting “spy” chips into Ethernet cords

Ulta
Oct 3, 2006

Snail on my head ready to go.

moonmazed posted:

i think the post that ended with "pornography is the dominant use of image capture" may not have been serious

Porn has been with computer images from the beginning

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna

Ulta
Oct 3, 2006

Snail on my head ready to go.

quarantinethepast posted:

Has the Turing Test been beaten yet? The claim by Goostman from 2014 doesn't count.

Also you gotta admit that if Google actually created a sentient AI (which is far from happening) they wouldn't have moral qualms to do what they wanted with it.

Turing test was beaten awhile ago. The trick is most people don’t remember the computer only needs to fool people 30% of the time.
E: this is to say the Turing test is like the Beckdel test, required but not sufficient to prove its point

Ulta fucked around with this message at 11:18 on Jun 15, 2022

Ulta
Oct 3, 2006

Snail on my head ready to go.

Mega Comrade posted:

If you are referencing the University of Reading one using Eugene Goostman then many AI researchers don't accept it as passing as it the test was only 5 minutes and the 30% thing is argued over. Turing never set that as a requirement, it was just in his prediction that by 2000 people would "not have more than 70 per cent chance" of identifying a computer, and some people have decided to interpret it that way as it makes it easier to beat.


Yah the whole trick were the computer pretends to be dumb or not speak the language is more of a cheat than a breakthrough in AI. I’ve heard the 30% of the time explained as a machine intelligence would probably be very different from a human intelligence.

Ulta
Oct 3, 2006

Snail on my head ready to go.

Blue Footed Booby posted:



Also I have a browser extension that lets me blacklist specific sites from showing up in search results. Otherwise it's loving impossible to find pictures that don't have stock image watermarks, or game walkthrough type stuff the isn't a literal copy paste of the same two sites.

Not to point out another small version of tech creating the torment nexus, but I think Snowcrash or something another Neil Stephenson book had corporations who intentionally put bad computer generated articles out onto the internet and then would sell you a subscription to a filter that would automatically filter out their articles.

Ulta
Oct 3, 2006

Snail on my head ready to go.

exmachina posted:

Not sure about snowcrash but Anathem mentioned it as something that had happened on the distant past and I think it was in his most recent book too

That was what I was thinking! Thanks

“Anathem” posted:


“Early in the Reticulum-thousands of years ago-it became almost useless because it was cluttered with faulty, obsolete, or downright misleading information,” Sammann said.
“Crap, you once called it,” I reminded him.
“Yes-a technical term. So crap filtering became important. Businesses were built around it. Some of those businesses came up with a clever plan to make more money: they poisoned the well. They began to put crap on the Reticulum deliberately, forcing people to use their products to filter that crap back out. They created syndevs whose sole purpose was to spew crap into the Reticulum. But it had to be good crap.”
“What is good crap?” Arsibalt asked in a politely incredulous tone.
“Well, bad crap would be an unformatted document consisting of random letters. Good crap would be a beautifully typeset, well-written document that contained a hundred correct, verifiable sentences and one that was subtly false. It’s a lot harder to generate good crap. At first they had to hire humans to churn it out. They mostly did it by taking legitimate documents and inserting errors-swapping one name for another, say. But it didn’t really take off until the military got interested.”

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ulta
Oct 3, 2006

Snail on my head ready to go.
Root is on shelves at Target so instead of pretending to be a capitalist in a big hat you can be an authoritarian whose a bird

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply