Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
How many quarters after Q1 2016 till Marissa Mayer is unemployed?
1 or fewer
2
4
Her job is guaranteed; what are you even talking about?
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Jumpingmanjim posted:

YikYak is dying, how will I spread vicious rumours about my sorority sisters now?

Whisper

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

nonathlon posted:

The fan boys for ogg were incredible: criticising devices for not using it, kramering into discussions to insist you use a "free audio format". I seem to recollect that even Wikipedia was moving towards ogg.

Just checked out the wikipedia page and it's got a lot of carefully worded statements: unencumbered by patent (we think), technically superior to formats with a higher public profile, trained listeners can tell the difference ...

Your attempted own is very misguided. OGG files are widely used in video game development, free formats certainly serve a purpose. Having to deal with licensing entities isn't fun and pretty much always makes the end product worse. And OGG compresses better than MP3 for example.

Also, to the audiophile, FLAC is the format of choice, not a compressed format like OGG.

Fame Douglas fucked around with this message at 10:09 on Sep 18, 2020

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

KozmoNaut posted:

The new hotness lossy format is its successor format Opus, which can reach impressively low bit rates without audible defects. Youtube has been using it for ages.

Opus is excellent for voice transmission at low bitrates as well, which is why it's often implemented in telephony/voice chat/meeting solutions.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Don't use OpenOffice, BTW. LibreOffice is what you want to use.

AAC never really took off, either. And Microsoft tried pushing WMA.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

nonathlon posted:

Yeah, despite all the listening tests and arguments about bitrates and formats, at a high-enough bitrate most everything sounds equally good and transcodes well under real listening conditions. At the gym or in your car, you'd be hard up to recognise FLAC vs MP£ vs whatever.

Ripping to a lossless format like FLAC is the smartest, though. Storage space is cheap, and from that one, you can always convert to a lossy format.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Tesla is obviously a solid company, Musk being a moron doesn't change that.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
With how many Teslas are on the road, it obviously is. And people acting like companies like GM or Ford that were bailed out by the taxpayer 10 years ago are the benchmark of solidity is weird.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
The Volt is discontinued. Can't have been that good a product if it didn't find any market, while Tesla did.

Sextro posted:

Great for California, hope they install sufficient generation for the water desalination plants.

Electrification of fossil fuels burning things is of course a positive change, but the entire concept of the personal vehicle is inimical to the levels of environmental impact we need to be striving to reach. Ideally not by strip mining what's left of the global south for lithium.

So we're agreeing that Tesla is producing a market-leading product that is ahead of proven loser companies like GM and Ford.

Fame Douglas fucked around with this message at 00:38 on Sep 25, 2020

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
The charger is pretty much just a cable with electric cars, no? So having the outlet in a convenient location would be the main challenge.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Owling Howl posted:

Still amusingly over-engineered for 0.85 miles or what amounts to a 20 min. walk. Imagine an airport opting for tunnels, cars, stations etc. instead of rolling sidewalks.

Or any of the other existing people mover systems that don't have the liability of a lithium battery that could burn on board because they get fed with electricity directly.

And I can't imagine the long-term operating costs of this system are competitive in any way.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
This is a stupid idea on so many levels compared to existing people mover systems. But one other facet: Those are all easily accessible to the disabled; Teslas won't be.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

luxury handset posted:

the las vegas convention center has a particular set of challenges and incentives that aren't present in public transportation

for challenges, they would find a tunnel situation more attractive because they only need to provide service for the entire campus, which is already covered with structures. the cost of tunneling may be comparable to the cost of trade-off of floorspace and construction devoted to walkways or shuttles or some other solution. and a raised track wouldn't be feasible at all for the interior of buildings. also, the distance to travel between points on campus is lesser, just from one side of the convention center to the other, and the cost of someone missing a trip is less - they can just walk to their destination and it's no big deal, nobody's using this thing for doctor's appointments or grocery shopping

That's not actually an "unique challenge" at all and very much the type of situation people mover systems like APM are designed for. Using batteries in tunnels on fixed guideways isn't some kind of genius new idea but pretty stupid.

luxury handset posted:

for incentives, they are much more attracted to some kind of flashy gimmick system. it doesn't need to be practical if it can be a unique experience. so raw throughput doesn't matter as much as leaving a neat impression. convention centers also compete for business among each other, and having a tesla-branded subway thing is a pretty big hook to continue to attract the business of the lucrative consumer electronics expo and other similar tech-adjacent conventions

A bad people mover system that's not ADA compliant seems more like a disincentive to me, but what do I know.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Maybe Zuck should go on a listening tour again and listen to the people over barbecue.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

luxury handset posted:

elon musk, notable science understander, grapples with the idea of rapid tests perhaps not being as accurate

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1327125840040169472

at this point can we basically consider musk to be a watered down trump for the early adopter set, in terms of how strongly he demonstrates regular and baffling incompetence

He's very evidently been quasi-Trump for years.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

peanut- posted:

Why limit yourself to just company scrip, we're heading back to the full on company town

https://twitter.com/alexnpress/status/1332389952890564608

That paints a very grim picture of the American education system, to be honest.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
It's also a very energy intensive mode of transportation.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
There are always idiots that expect tech to take amazing leaps that are wholly unrealistic. Just think of how many people these days imagine we'll be colonizing space and end up a multi-planet species, or flying at warp speed in the future.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
No, planetary and space colonization is absolutely not within our reach. We won't be colonizing even our solar system.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Unless you consider "space colonization" to mean "3 scientist on some station a long way from earth" then no, space colonization is absolutely not within our grasp technologically. Especially not useful space colonization. Space nerds have tons of dumb ideas that are impractical is the point. Space exploration is a huge waste of resources.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Could have been potentially disastrous had the court decided otherwise. gently caress Oracle.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Space Gopher posted:

You probably have lots of automation in your home. Thermostats, garage door openers, dishwashers, and even self-closing spring hinges are “home automation” in some sense. It’s just that when a particular piece of automation is really useful and relatively cheap, it stops being “home automation technology” and starts being part of the baseline for what we expect in a home.

Home automation usually refers to internet-connected "IoT" devices, not offline thermostats.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Rea posted:

To answer the question posed by this seriously, it'd mean things like ReactOS would be illegal in the US, since it's a reimplementation of the Windows API.

And more importantly, Wine, the Windows API on Linux that is the basis for getting many games to run on Linux. Or even Linux itself, could mean SCO suddenly has a case.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Kyte posted:

I've heard of this case in recent news and stuff, but there's one thing I'm not quite clear on.

Did Google only reimplement the Java API? Articles I've read seem to imply they also copied framework code as part of the reimplementation process, which would've definitely been a gross violation of copyright that they'd only get away with because they can afford the legal costs.

No, they didn't copy any code. It was a cleanroom reimplementation based on the Java framework.

Also, Oracle is a huge (and terrible) company of mostly lawyers, not exactly the type of company that couldn't afford a prolonged legal battle.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
It's a dumb idea in general. Why are you in a voice chat where people are constantly being racist, want to keep being in that voice chat but don't want to hear the "bad words"? Is the idea that the words themselves are the problem and not the racism, and these are fine people if you just bleep them?

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

RPATDO_LAMD posted:

Maybe you want to have fun talking with the other people in your online game who are usually fine but one in 5 rounds or so you get matched up with a Gamer(tm)

That's not the public voice chat experience at all. I also don't get how bleeping helps the situation.

Join a private Discord, it's the only way to converse with reasonable people and not kids wanting to be edgy.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Huego posted:

lmao dude anyone from any background, speaking any language, would take note if they heard what sounded like someone saying a slur. he didn't call the person out, he didn't try to ban the word, he just said "whoa hey that sounds like the n-word" like literally every english speaker does when they first run across it

do some introspection on why you think acting like that makes you seem woke

Really hosed up you're defending this.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Parent installing a voice chat word filter on their children's PCs so "bad words" get filtered out? Sorry, but that's still really dumb. The words themselves aren't the issue, bleeping them really helps nothing. Stop your children from joining public voice chat if you don't want them to hear "bad words". Racism is the problem, not individual words that can be filtered to make everything alright.

I also doubt this filter would ever work reliably enough.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Booourns posted:

What happens if the tweet is deleted after being sold

Nothing. You bought Ethereum coin shavings with a link, not the Tweet.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Beelzebufo posted:

Isn't the IPFS its own torrent/decentralized thing where you have to pay money to maintain hosting? Curious how many NFTs already link to dead files because all the "seeds" went away.

IPFS is something like Torrent, you need someone to host/seed the file, but that could be yourself.

The concept of a "digital original" is moronic/impossible, and for buying something from an artist there are tons of ways that don't involve stupid tokens.

Fame Douglas fucked around with this message at 21:31 on Apr 12, 2021

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Also, in this case, only the json file is on the IPFS (which you can't change, as that would change the hash), the garbage art Beeple tricked some rube into buying is just on a regular server by Makersplace, so you're dependent on Makersplace still existing and hosting the file in the future for the token to have any "worth"

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

funkymonks posted:

I have a miniature schnauzer who absolutely loves to shake the heck out of beanie babies.

Please, don't shake the (beanie) baby.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Hal Finney, who most likely was Satoshi, died in 2014.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Well, up $72 from the forecasted price now, lmao.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Just like with pretty much any other car, you need to keep your hands on the wheel for autopilot to keep functioning, unless you're defeating it with weights or similar implements.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Look at those dummies over at NASA, burning shitloads of fuel to escape the earth's gravity well. Why don't they just invent an anti-gravity device?? Kirk has that on the Enterprise.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

TheScott2K posted:

I don't know how you throw around the phrase "full self-driving" and avoid liability, honestly. All the nag screens in the world aren't gonna drown that out.

They call it "Navigate on Autopilot". Full Self-Driving is what you're paying for when you buy the feature, used to be available "some time soon", now with a "maybe sometime in the future, maybe not"-type disclaimer.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

suck my woke dick posted:

That's still 500 in extra losses per vehicle :v:

They can make it up in regulatory credits.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

suck my woke dick posted:

I suspect it's 500 for the kind of lidar you put on a fancy Arduino project, 5k for the kind that's semi reliable getting rained on and rattled around as an automotive part?

The $500 figure comes from a company advertising a new, cheaper LIDAR system for cars. No clue how many of those units you'd need and whether it is already available as a commercial product. With a 120° FoV, that would be ~$1500 for full coverage, if that is even necessary.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Silly Burrito posted:

Don't the newest iPhones have Lidar? Glue a few of those to your car and problem solved.

Considering how expensive Iphones are, probably would end up more expensive.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Nissin Cup Nudist posted:

Lowtax is collating all of our shitposts to leak to someone

Worse than that: They're already public!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply