Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Giant Squid
May 17, 2005
Tentacles rise from the sea...
I've been trying to learn more about politics (and other things I probably should have learned in high school) recently, and I'm pretty confused by the campaign finance laws here in the US. Specifically, I don't think I really get some of the finer points of PACS and campaign donations.

1. I think I understand that there are solid caps on how much hard money can be given to a single candidate.(That's right, isn't it?) Are there similar specific caps on how much a PAC or Super PAC can donate to a party?

2. I was under the impression that 527 groups can't specifically endorse any candidate. It seems like that would really lessen the effectiveness of PACS and Super PACS. I know that they can run ads that are pretty clearly against a particular candidate, but are PACS and Super-PACS actually banned from doing anything that specifically endorses a candidate?

3. I understand why the Citizens United decision was a big deal, but why don't we ever hear anything about Speechnow.org v. FEC? It seems like the decision stating that PACS can accept unlimited contributions for making "independent expenditures" is equally or even more important than deciding that corporations and unions can donate to PACs straight out of their treasuries. Am I way off base there?

4. Is it true that the FEC is made up of three Republicans and three Democrats? If so, doesn't this make it basically impossible for the organization to do its job? Wouldn't almost all votes end in a 3-3 tie?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Giant Squid
May 17, 2005
Tentacles rise from the sea...

Junior G-man posted:

These being also can't and won't coordinate with the official candidate's campaign. No, not at all, nuh-uh.

They especially won't do this when they're staffed by colleagues, friends, former campaign managers , acquaintances, neighbours and others who have no connection to either the candidate or his or her top staff.

Never. Ever. Don't think it.

Yeah, it kind of blew my mind that literally being business partners with someone running a PAC doesn't count as coordination.

Also, I was obviously pretty wrong about the whole "PACS can't endorse candidates" thing. Isn't there some other kind of organization that can run ads conveniently trashing the other candidate in a two-person race but can't endorse anyone?

Giant Squid
May 17, 2005
Tentacles rise from the sea...
But aren't PACS a type of 527?

  • Locked thread