|
Yep, in, so very in.
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 12:09 |
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Look, next time maybe I'll run showtunes, but this is meant to be the 1980s and you knew it when you sent in that video. CCKeane trying to get some sweet rear end Beethoven role
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2016 00:20
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Gilbert and Sullivan, actually. Noice
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
Did this game start yet
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2016 22:28
|
|
|
My role is the best role and also the best song. I have read nothing, just confirming that I am excited. Will catch up now!!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 00:54
|
|
|
Kumbamontu posted:
Unnecessary town PR outing, ##vote Kumba
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:00
|
|
lie detector spotted
|
Asiina posted:I don't believe this loving bullshit for a second. Max is a goddamn piece of poo poo who would obviously pick some seriously strong role for a crazy CYOR. Like, what an rear end in a top hat to think that we are dumb enough to fall for this garbage. "Oh I totally picked a boring role I'm so sad." Go gently caress yourself. We aren't complete morons like you who would believe that someone would pick a boring role. Obviously you'd believe it because you are barely functioning, but we are smarter than you. A loving ham sandwich is smarter than you. What in the world song did you pick that your PR is you have to be as angry as possible Asiina, good lawd
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
Max posted:Wait, Asiina, you suck, you just quoted me from the other game. Oh.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:02
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I had to write that for another game and wanted my hard work to be seen by everyone. My angry rage against Max is fake, but my vote is real because this post is a bad post. This is a bad reason for Asiina's real vote, bad vibes. What's the deal, Asiina, you look like the jerk here so I'm not sure why you are doubling down.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Hey Quid, did you roll scum in your third straight game? Nope, not this time, thankfully!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:36
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:I like the recent quidnose style of rushing into games guns blazing like a scum hunter gone wild out for blood. I have always done this. I think maybe you have just been reading mafia games content more lately.... 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:36
|
|
|
Tricky Dick Nixon posted:I feel like I'm only getting half of a story here. Whatever the reasons for Asiina's vote, it feels like its based on nothing involved with this game, and while lovely, it doesn't feel particularly scum. But she's saying it's a serious vote based on his reaction here, and that's ridiculous. Outside game crap has nothing to do with his alignment here.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:37
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Do you 100% guarantee that you are town? I 100% guarantee I am town but you can't read me, babe~
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
Asiina posted:If you're going to vote for someone for a real reason, the fact that they died in another game is irrelevant. I think your reason for voting Max is terrible and I think you're using the joke of your insult post to ride the fact that "well that wasn't my REAL reason, man" while simultaneously pushing a bad vote as "real."
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
Tommunist posted:TMM is a lie detector Can we stop doing this
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
Here's an idea in this POWER ROLE HEAVY GAME, even if you see something that is a no brainer to almost everyone, maybe we don't out the role it could be in case we have naive scum / wolf / 3p who might get defensive and not know what it is!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:41
|
|
|
Tommunist posted:its not like hes being subtle It's not him I'm worried about ya knob
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 01:41
|
|
|
I don't see how that single post warranted enough of a scum vibe for you to vote him, Asiina. Please explain why you think that's a slam dunk.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
##vote Asiina
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 02:26
|
|
|
kaschei posted:I think asiina's reason for voting max is Good Enough For D1 It's good enough for D1 but not in the context of anything he's done since then. I've seen her happily sit upon it here and defend it as A Good Vote and I disagree, especially since she's not looking at anything else he's doing.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
I don't see Max as scum throwing a big fit about this to the point of attempting to rage replace out. He had no hear, no reason to paint a target on himself, and could have quietly complained in scum doc. Why would he do this here?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:good point. ##vote asiina lets kill mher It's actually not a great point because aside from saying "My KB post was innocuous" Max hasn't said a ton. I'd like to see him respond to Asiina's point. This vote is pretty opportunistic and detached from an analytical standpoint on Gulag doll's part and I am suspicious of him now as well.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
Yeah in rereading the Max/Asiina thing basically boils down to "your intent was this" "nope my intent wasn't that" and there really isn't anything for the other party to say that hasn't been said.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 03:38
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:he has responded to her only point over and over tho, and i dont see what he would have to say would matter w/r/t asiina, in regards to this matter. This is a major contradiction to your agreeing with me and voting Asiina so I'm not sure what has suddenly happened other than me calling you out
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 03:39
|
|
|
I initially said that Asiina was voting Max for a single event while ignoring his content. You agreed with this and voted her. I then came in and said that that point was super valid because I hadn't seen him say anything of substance beyond "he said she said" retorts and would like to see him respond more. To which you expanded: GulagDolls posted:he has responded to her only point over and over tho, and i dont see what he would have to say would matter w/r/t asiina, in regards to this matter. So what does this mean, because it makes it seem like you think Max is avoiding content, which would make Asiina genuine and Max the liar, but you are voting Asiina?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 03:53
|
|
|
I mean technically you are still voting yourself but you get my point.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 03:53
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:i have very little idea wtf you are talking about. i dont think max is avoiding content or w/e, i think he was incensed. Ok. What relevance does that has to what I said re: Asiina vs. Max that you felt the need to interject with your comment about Max's content?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 03:59
|
|
|
So your facetious self vote which you are sitting on was, in fact, facetious and you still believe Asiina is a bad man?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
I attempted to seriously engage with Gulag and I have learned my lesson
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 04:20
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I know you go back on this, but he hasn't really done anything else other than get angry with me for something unrelated to my vote and misrepresent the reason for my vote. There's nothing else to look at. When I made a point that he was claiming things I hadn't said, he goes back to the anger at the fact that I insulted him. Do you think he would do this as scum? Is this the scummiest thing that has happened so far?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 04:24
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I looked at the other votable people. I wouldn't vote for Madman. Power breadcrumbs aside, he's done nothing objectionable. I don't like that you dismiss everyone else as not worthwhile for reading today, and I'm disappointed you aren't casing some of the other people who I think are doing scummy things. I don't really like this read on Cpig, this handwave of TMM, and the fact that basically all you've said at this point is "Max is the only viable vote." I think this is incredibly lazy play from you. Are you overextended or scum?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 04:48
|
|
|
Tommunist posted:I'm beginning to think the Asiina max thing is town - town slap fight or at least non scum slap fight , which would make Cpigs actions more scummy in my mind since it makes people focus on a small subset of people. I also really dislike this post and basically everything Tommunist has done.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 04:49
|
|
|
Asiina posted:If you have a way to read CPig, I'd love to hear it cause after 2 years I still have nothing. I just know that he's done this kinda thing before, so I don't think the fact that he made a bunch of thunderdomes is an alignment-tell. I just don't see a point in spending all this time delineating all of the reasons why some people are "so towny" or "so null" when all you really need to be saying is "Not really feeling any of the other people, mostly null reads, TMM feeling town this game, Max is still for sure the scummiest." Your case on Max still comes down to a single statement he made and the fact that he's....mad? I don't even see you as saying "Max is feigning anger to distract," just "dude's mad and there's no reason to be." Your list is basically a fabricated list of null reads and you are spinning the one that's convenient to you. Even this request for me to engage you on the merits of a CPig case and the ability to case him seems really disingenuous because what is that going to accomplish? Yes, I agree with you, Cpig is a null read, but how can you have no opinions on literally anything that isn't Max?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 04:57
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I said I thought Madman was probably town and that I liked the content Tomm put out. How is that having no opinions? This is not a ringing endorsement of Tommunists "content," which you admit is a ton of bullshit: Asiina posted:I read Tomm cause people were talking about him earlier, and while it's a lot of garbage, it's not entirely garbage. He does have 3 real posts: You don't even have any comments on Tommunist's "actual content," just that it doesn't bug you. You leave it to the thread to stand on it's own. How is this presenting the case for him being town? How is this a town endorsement? Your TMM case is better but still not great and pretty hit and run. quote:Also I did sorta say Max is feigning anger to distract: You are using a statement that, again, doesn't make an alignment call to say "yes, in fact, I did actually make an alignment call on him." You are making very safe statements and turning back on them to twist them to the narrative you would like to create. This is a scum tactic. I believe you are scum.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Like I was willing to give Asiina the benefit of the doubt if she came in and looked at some of the other things that have happened but she didn't and her cases are really weak and swingy and I'm pretty sure she's scum now.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Asiina's reasons for voting Max:Asiina posted:That's dumb, that's not a reason. Initial statement, no vote attached. Pretty much a throwaway poke at someone on D1. Then she drops her big "real vote" pulled from another game statement, which I am going to ignore, because it does not present a reason for WHY she is voting Max. She then explains her reasoning for voting Max: Asiina posted:My vote here is a real vote. Well, not there. Asiina posted:I had to write that for another game and wanted my hard work to be seen by everyone. My angry rage against Max is fake, but my vote is real because this post is a bad post. Oh, not there either. Asiina posted:If you're going to vote for someone for a real reason, the fact that they died in another game is irrelevant. That's in response to me asking why she voted Max when she was the one coming off as a jerk. Again, doesn't actually explain why she voted, just why she DIDN'T vote. Asiina posted:I'm not talking about my insult post at all related to my vote. I'm only mentioning it because apparently Max thought it was for real and is angry about it, and it was never intended that way. How could that possibly be a reason for a vote? It has nothing to do with anything. OH, there's the reason, finally. Does it strike anyone else as odd that it takes her this long to actually SAY what her reason is?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 05:11
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Are you seriously saying I'm not making an alignment call on Max? And again, you dodge my point. I KNOW you think Max is scum, you have been shouting it all day since he blew up at you. Problems: 1. Your reason for him being scum is terrible and could be easily explained as a null read. I don't see any other reason other than "he got mad at me." Are you saying the new reason is "he got mad at me and then misrepresented me?" HAVE you said that? 2. You've offered no other opinions on anyone. This looks fairly scummy.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 05:12
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I'm sorry if my cases are weak, but it's D1 and I have 4 people to choose from. There is more than 1 day and dismissing the entire day as useless because we can't vote for people is ridiculous and scummy, because we can easily make cases on other people who we can vote for tomorrow. This is SO lazy of you.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 05:13
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Also are my cases swingy or am I tunneling on Max as the only viable vote? Make up your mind on how you are trying to attack me. Show me how I have contradicted myself if you are going to say this. Do some casework on people rather than just throwing out insult attacks on easy and loud targets, because when you don't follow it up with casework it looks scummy as hell.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 05:15
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 12:09 |
|
|
Asiina posted:The first post was my reason. I just saw an opportunity to also use the giant post I had saved to a notepad on my desktop, and thought I'd use it as a funny, funny joke to go along with my vote. So you are still voting for Max purely for that initial post? That is, still, the scummiest thing that has happened all day, enough to warrant your vote and to justify your ignoring every other post, person, and happening in this thread, beyond the null reads you have mentioned?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2016 05:21
|
|