|
So who remembers during the Nathaniel Hawthorne unit of high school english class, learning about how in puritan times "the woods" were a symbol of the spooky unknown? That is this film in a nutshell, and it's good. To summarize the setup: a family is exiled from a puritan New England settlement and starts a homestead on the edge of the forest. The dad chops wood. A lot of it. They notice that every time they or the camera look at the edge of the dark forest nearby, creepy ambient music plays. Then their baby disappears, and the family starts to freak out. There's also a black goat - that's probably no big deal though, right? First of all, it's an excellent, beautifully shot period piece of a 1600s New England puritan homestead. The dialogue was period-accurate which pleased me a lot but I could see it annoying some (subtitles wouldn't be a terrible idea). The way the house, barn, and fences were all built, the costume, the food they ate, the wood chopping... I'm not an expert in 1600s New England but there was enough attention to detail that I assume they did their research. Either way I found it very convincing. Second, and obviously the point of the film, is that it's a great ambient horror piece. Not a ton actually happens, but there is a terrific sense of evil the whole time. Much like the family in the film, as an audience I found myself constantly on-edge and scared but not sure what I was afraid of. The times when there is actual action, it is realistic in a way that made me squirm and cringe a little. When there is an actual witchly ritual, holy poo poo is it disconcerting. Cinematography note: the lighting and color balance stood out to me as particularly good. After the film, someone told me that apparently they used natural light to the maximum extent possible, which I think added a lot to the... primitive, squalid, inglamorous feel of the family's life. The soundtrack contributed a lot to the ambient horror. It was a mix of scratchy creepy strings, and discordant stuff that reminded me of Ligeti (the guy who wrote the creepy choir stuff from 2001). Oh also it has the breastfeeding lady from Game of Thrones. Anyway it was the best horror film I've seen since It Follows. I give it 8/10, with 10/10 for the wood chopping scenes. Please discuss.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2016 16:52 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 11:00 |
|
Mithra6 posted:I suspect some of the curse elements might be missed by some people, because the filmmakers don't draw your attention to certain things. It's just part of the backdrop of the world in the movie. Could you elaborate (in spoiler tags)?
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2016 17:47 |
|
Cool, I caught the egg and the rabbit but not the other things. I wanna see it again too. There are so many cool details in the film and yet most if them don't even feel deliberate, they just feel like someone pointed a camera at an actual 1630 homestead.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2016 18:23 |
|
As far as movies about new england witch magick go, it's up there with Hocus Pocus.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2016 19:42 |
|
Man, I'm really surprised to hear how different people's audiences were. My audience was dead silent.
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2016 15:33 |
|
I worked at a movie theater for years, and just lol at people who ask for a refund. (Sorry if this is an old topic here, this is my first CD thread ) I'm still really intrigued by the "using mostly natural light" aspect. I've done a little filming of my own but I'm not very knowledgeable. But I find it hard to imagine not using at least some extra fill light, even when filming in daylight. Do you think they did? Or maybe they used reflectors to use the sun as fill light?
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2016 19:15 |
|
This is my first time in CD, are films always this divisive
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2016 21:55 |
|
lol nice
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2016 13:12 |
|
eSporks posted:I don't see how you can think the witches deliberately manipulated the family to recruit thomasin, there is no evidence for it. That may have been the intent of the movie, but it was not demonstrated. This is like postmodern literary theory 101 and it's not a bad thing
|
# ¿ Feb 29, 2016 21:57 |
|
Surlaw posted:Babies are full of Original Sin. That's like the most sin per pound that a monster can possibly find, of course they eat them. It's like McNuggets to woods witches. Not to mention the sin per time alive quantity is unrivalled.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 20:17 |
|
COOL CORN posted:People referring to the dialog as "Old English" is giving the linguist in me a twitch. Same, and i similarly get nerd-angry when people refer to Shakespeare as "old english"
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2016 18:28 |
|
Lil Mama Im Sorry posted:if a movie doesn't scare me that doth not mean it's not still a horror movie... Verily
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2016 01:57 |
|
Lil Mama Im Sorry posted:*yawn* rosemary's baby is like an episode of full house Rosemary's baby with a laugh track would be really disconcerting
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2016 02:36 |
|
Snak posted:And that's totally fine. Predictability doesn't negate horror. I like-a this post
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2016 14:23 |
|
Senf posted:Not sure if it's been discussed already, but I just want to say that the Black Phillip song sung by Mercy and Jonas is great and that until now, I didn't know the exact words. From the director: Gonna go record the doom metal version of this, brb
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2016 22:28 |
|
Just watched this again for the first time since theaters. Definitely just as good the second time around, and I really enjoyed noticing more cool details of it. I also paid close attention to the lighting, since I only learned about the director's "natural lighting as much as possible" approach after my last viewing. It really shows. Especially in the house in the scenes with Caleb lying unconscious and then freaking out and dying., the way the natural light comes in through the window works really well. Definitely paid more attention to the deadly sins that correspond to the different characters. I had previously totally missed the apple that Caleb vomits up, the same apple he had lied about, so thanks to people itt who pointed out that detail, that's super cool and spooky.
|
# ¿ May 15, 2016 16:37 |
|
smallmouth posted:Obviously the apple he throws up before dying is representative of the fruit of tree of the knowledge of good and evil--the apple comes up whole, he didn't "eat" it. Ooh I hadn't thought of that angle, I just thought it was his lie coming back up his throat. Also he has lust but he tries to suppress it and be good. e: well, until, you know alnilam fucked around with this message at 15:49 on May 19, 2016 |
# ¿ May 19, 2016 15:46 |
|
It's October, the spookiest of months, and therefore a good time to watch The Vvitch if you haven't yet, IMO. I personally plan on doing a double feature with the other spookiest witch movie, Hocus Pocus.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2016 21:40 |
|
Waverhouse posted:Watched this movie. Acting, photography, and general aesthetic were amazing. Well paced imo, and built and held tension well. That's a cool reading imo, but yeah if you went off explaining it to someone you'd be in danger of sounding like an obnoxious Internet Atheist. But I'll assume the best of you and say hey that's actually a cool interpretation.
|
# ¿ Nov 8, 2016 14:22 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 11:00 |
|
Trumps Baby Hands posted:Black Phillip, Black Phillip Henchman of Santa posted:I watched this last night. I didn't love it but I thought it was cool and I would definitely recommend it to other people like me who are too wimpy for many horror movies, because it's mostly about atmosphere and the couple of jump scare type moments are massively telegraphed SPOOKY REVEALs. Really beautifully shot and great music, which people haven't talked about much in this thread (though I have a few pages left to read). I did need subtitles though, between the dialect and the quietness of their voices (especially when the kids are listening through the wall when they're supposed to be asleep). Yeah i liked the music a lot. I also like your Shining parallels - might not be intentional but who cares.
|
# ¿ Jan 28, 2017 20:30 |