|
ProfessorProf posted:Well, surely you're not suggesting that the honest and beloved baron Rorgueil deliberately tried to frame Dame Caterline? Because that would be the most outlandish theory yet. The baron is a pillar of our community! He would never do such a thing. Oh, burn.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2016 08:55 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2024 23:50 |
|
EponymousMrYar posted:Fortunately as Falcon explained, he still has an out in that he didn't prove anything. Unfortunately since he himself spun everything together he has the upward battle of fighting against himself without discrediting himself in the process I don't see a problem. A lawyer presents his client's case, not his own personal opinions. If Monsieur Falcon was to be hired by the Baron to present a defence then it would be his simple ethical duty to present a case for the Baron's innocence - the fact that he has previously made other statements is irrelevant as he was then acting for a different client. (In the adversarial legal system a lawyer's duty is not to the truth but to his or her client. As long as the lawyer doesn't actually lie or knowingly assist his client in doing so then everything is kosher)
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 11:13 |
|
ProfessorProf posted:He's super mad. But hey, a criminal's a criminal, right? If the lion didn't want a death sentence, he probably shouldn't have killed a guy. Oh, you're not here to defend him, are ya? Because that would be hilarious. That would be hilarious. I think Falcon should do it. I mean, he's already familiar with the case. He should be able to whip up a defence without even leaving the office. (Step 1 of which is 'Do not let the Baron speak in court under any circumstances") Oh and Mr Fox is so not a prince. Except that's too obvious, so he probably is.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2016 03:50 |