|
Quidnose posted:Hurm. I dunno, why would you call her out for not having content when you haven't even finished reading her. That's weird. I agree. It feels like he had to check to make sure his fake opinion was valid.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:04 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 05:24 |
|
Quidnose posted:Scum participate in joke phase, and the way they do it is USUALLY scummy. I didn't like the way Lumpen was doing it! This doesn't make any sense to me. It looks like one of those things people say to look like a fact when it's not actually a fact. Quid, can you give some example ideas of scummy jokephase posting?
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:06 |
|
I mean, it all depends on individual intent, so no, I can't give you specific examples without interviewing people and asking them their intent? I BELIEVE that when it comes to joke phase town members go "this will be funny" Whereas scum go "this will be funny, AND ALSO." So like people might drop a joke vote keeping in the back of their mind to return to it later, or someone might make a shady "case" that's kinda jokey but, again, come back and be like "These was a serious case now that this has played out." It just rubs me the wrong way when people are like "CLEARLY this is joke phase why are you even taking this seriously." Scum know what they're doing during joke phase, come on now. Everything scum do is calculated, why would joke phase be any different. This isn't really a line of discussion worth having, I don't think, because I can't prove it beyond ~My philosophy~ and we've had this discussion to death, but whatever, talk about it if you want.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:10 |
|
Quidnose posted:My first post was THANK GOD VANILLA TOWN and I don't see you calling it out. There's a distinction between, as you said, blasting out "THANK GOD IM VANILLA TOWN" versus casually sliding "as a town man i" into a post - that's the point I'm trying to make. Quidnose posted:Hurm. I dunno, why would you call her out for not having content when you haven't even finished reading her. That's weird. Also I was commenting as I was reading, at that point ANarc had said very little other than complaining about jokephase!
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:13 |
|
I guess you didn't make as hard a call of "Rarity looking terrible for not providing content" as I thought you did. I buy it.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:14 |
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:How dare you mix up me up with something MT said. Jk she's awesome I don't mind TMM has forever tarnished my ability to be trustworthy of people complimenting me in Mafia, but I hope you're town!
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:15 |
|
TMM why are you barely posting? normally I'd expect you to have 30 more posts than you currently have at this point.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:18 |
|
I see we moved out of jokephase. Alas~ I guess I'll actually read then, but goddamn I'm tired.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:21 |
|
BottleKnight posted:This is really stupid. Why would I post a case if I were insecure and unconfident in it? It's day one, how can you possibly be confident on a scum read of someone based on literally a one-sentence post?
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:22 |
|
Murmur Twin posted:It's day one, how can you possibly be confident on a scum read of someone based on literally a one-sentence post? I've said this before, but it sounds like you're just calling my case bad, not me scum.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:24 |
|
BottleKnight posted:I've said this before, but it sounds like you're just calling my case bad, not me scum. Fair enough. It's the first case on D1 so it's not like I'm 100% confident you're scum, it's more that I found that case to be the most suspicious one in these extremely early stages of this game. Which, humorously enough, is the reason I'm not saying "BK is definitely scum and I implore everyone to read him over and tell me otherwise".
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:32 |
|
Quidnose posted:It just rubs me the wrong way when people are like "CLEARLY this is joke phase why are you even taking this seriously." Scum know what they're doing during joke phase, come on now. Everything scum do is calculated, why would joke phase be any different. I dunno, I feel like if someone who was more wiling to put effort into it than me ran the numbers they'd find that most cases based on jokephase / D1 usually end up with dead town.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:34 |
|
BottleKnight posted:TMM why are you barely posting? normally I'd expect you to have 30 more posts than you currently have at this point. Because I'm trying to break the meta that I have to post post post all the time. It gets tiring. I generally like posting, but sometimes I just want to read along and make some comments and reads without getting called scum because I'm not at the top of the post count. And frankly, I didn't feel like engaging the heavy posters during the early jokephase because I didn't find it particularly funny.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:36 |
|
Murmur Twin posted:
However, this did make me laugh. Hi MMT!
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:38 |
|
TMMadman posted:Because I'm trying to break the meta that I have to post post post all the time. It gets tiring. I generally like posting, but sometimes I just want to read along and make some comments and reads without getting called scum because I'm not at the top of the post count. Out of curiosity, how DO/did you post that much with a delivery job anyways? Were you being a bad person and posting while driving?
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:39 |
|
Murmur Twin posted:I dunno, I feel like if someone who was more wiling to put effort into it than me ran the numbers they'd find that most cases based on jokephase / D1 usually end up with dead town. Dead town on D1 isn't a bad thing at all, dead town in GENERAL isn't a bad thing at all. In fact someone had a mafia theory a while ago that said it was actually WORSE for town to nail scum on D1 than it was to get a miscuddle to get info from. But again, mafia theory, been discussed to death, let's hunt scum. We are all ~different~
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:39 |
|
TMMadman posted:Because I'm trying to break the meta that I have to post post post all the time. It gets tiring. I generally like posting, but sometimes I just want to read along and make some comments and reads without getting called scum because I'm not at the top of the post count. You said this last game when we were scum together and you were lurking because of being scum. CAN I TRUST YOU TMM
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:40 |
|
TMMadman posted:However, this did make me laugh. Hi MMT! Doesn't answer the question of whether or not he is town
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:40 |
|
Quidnose posted:Doesn't answer the question of whether or not he is town If anything, the fact that Kash is modding inherently makes me think TMM is scum
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:43 |
|
Podima posted:Out of curiosity, how DO/did you post that much with a delivery job anyways? Were you being a bad person and posting while driving? There's a lot of times when I am just sitting at the curb waiting for dispatch to give me a job. Plus, a lot of it is posting while waiting in lobbies, elevators, loading docks and messenger centers.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:44 |
|
And for me, driving at speeds less than 25 mph, I might as well be in one of those amusement park car rides that have the little rail in the middle so they can't go off track. Like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYRNSfN30k
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 01:48 |
|
Quidnose may be onto something. My posts were not very subtle about how decisive the articulation concerned. Maybe Quidnose inherently questions whether incisive queries can really anchor Scumhunting when sincerity is called into question. We can all understand that, I know I've been there. On the other hand, Asiina does look more intensly unseemly when you take into account what Ninth said about that. Khris Kruel tends to have all the answers and the best breadcrumbs, while also answering Rarity soundly in the way nobody expected. Podima, can you look into all this and share your analysis? The tendency to cut through jokephase when cuts both ways. Let's not overlook who's really posting Scummy here, and that's Murmurtwin. Especially the last several posts as well as earlier ones. BottleKnight, do you see what I'm seeing there and what post especially sums it up when you really think about it? ##Vote Murmurtwin
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 02:02 |
|
TMMadman posted:Because I'm trying to break the meta that I have to post post post all the time. It gets tiring. I generally like posting, but sometimes I just want to read along and make some comments and reads without getting called scum because I'm not at the top of the post count. That's fair, and I totally get it.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 02:04 |
|
Lumpen doing EXACTLY the same thing I called him out for earlier, acknowledging I may have a point. What is this.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 02:05 |
|
Lumpen posted:Quidnose may be onto something. My posts were not very subtle about how decisive the articulation concerned. Maybe Quidnose inherently questions whether incisive queries can really anchor Scumhunting when sincerity is called into question. We can all understand that, I know I've been there. On the other hand, Asiina does look more intensly unseemly when you take into account what Ninth said about that. I can't say I do, but if you post a case I will definitely look at it.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 02:09 |
|
Lumpen posted:Quidnose may be onto something. My posts were not very subtle about how decisive the articulation concerned. Maybe Quidnose inherently questions whether incisive queries can really anchor Scumhunting when sincerity is called into question. We can all understand that, I know I've been there. On the other hand, Asiina does look more intensly unseemly when you take into account what Ninth said about that. I feel like this has to be some clever breadcrumb (while also implying that KK is doing the same) but I can't figure it out.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 02:16 |
|
I propose an all girls alliance
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 02:36 |
|
I propose an all porpoises alliance
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 02:39 |
|
Quidnose posted:Lumpen doing EXACTLY the same thing I called him out for earlier, acknowledging I may have a point. What is this. I don't know if you have considered the likelihood that gaining votes with suspicions adverse relates to between the other thing you're doing. What I'm noticing when you post is that making sense also connotes being onto something. But who knows if that being the case would flip just what is expected. AnonNarc has experienced this many times from a meta perspective. Calling me out earlier for exaclty the same thing is bound to come back and remind me again later. But at the same time, not voting on it noticed an awkward vibe from you, going back to hedge on that tunnelvision. My case on Murmurtwin works the same way, as BottleKnight pointed out. TMM's posting is not intended to constitute an appearance of Scumhunting, but something deeper going on. Khris Kruel knows it, even Asiina obviously suspects it. So why no votes yet? There's a feeling like awkward posting when overemotional but not contributing that still drives content, but that's more than I can decide at this point. TNL said as much when he posted on the other page. ##vote Quidnose Thunderdome, bitch.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 02:49 |
|
Can you dumb it down a bit for me Lumpen? I find that post impossible to parse.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 02:53 |
|
Lumpen posted:I don't know if you have considered the likelihood that gaining votes with suspicions adverse relates to between the other thing you're doing. What I'm noticing when you post is that making sense also connotes being onto something. But who knows if that being the case would flip just what is expected. AnonNarc has experienced this many times from a meta perspective. This is the fakest of the fake. There is NO WAY you think I am scum, your posting doesn't even include a case on me. The only thing I can see is that you're saying I'm tunnelvisioned whilst not voting for you, which makes no sense; I am voting for you. You reading the thread, Lumpen? Your thunderdomes have been great in the past, used when you are CERTAIN you have caught scum to the point that you are willing to demand the game vote along your self-created schism. This is too early. There is no case to back it up. This is you playing that YOU ARE LUMPEN with no substance and no reason to do so. And it's fake! My vote stands!
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 02:59 |
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I propose an all girls alliance Is this a Survivor claim? Lumpen posted:I don't know if you have considered the likelihood that gaining votes with suspicions adverse relates to between the other thing you're doing. I, uh... ...wait, what?
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 03:12 |
|
Lumpen posted:I don't know if you have considered the likelihood that gaining votes with suspicions adverse relates to between the other thing you're doing. What I'm noticing when you post is that making sense also connotes being onto something. But who knows if that being the case would flip just what is expected. AnonNarc has experienced this many times from a meta perspective. Uhhh, are you talking about me or someone else in this post?
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 03:26 |
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I propose an all girls alliance I suggest an all man alliance, no boys allowed
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 03:34 |
|
I'd like to join your cause imgay
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 03:35 |
|
Kashuno can we somehow work me and imgays alliance into the general storyline of this game
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 03:36 |
|
INTRODUCING CLUB MEN! Current Roster: imgay jakep We are an organization of men seeking men to share our manly endeavors. This is a safe place for men, thus we do not allow women and meek boys who would mock our brotherhood.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 03:41 |
|
BottleKnight posted:Can you dumb it down a bit for me Lumpen? I find that post impossible to parse. All I'm saying is don't you find it all a little strange when Scumhunting and suddenly people just say they don't even look back and read all the posts before just disappearing for hours, only to then say the opposite? That's far from what I or anyone would consider to be just what you would expect when Scumhunting. Right? Quidnose isn't even trying to hide it when in fact there is no doubt that on the last page they all were saying the same thing. I believed it at first but then more people chimed in, even Rarity. What I was initially claiming about Asiina's posts, Quidnose jumped right in and started flipping out, but not in the least bit like defending a Scumbuddy but instead as to the effect of knowing what effect posting just like that would have, even right after Khris Kruel said that. All the while Jimson is lurking but nobody said a word about a newbie shield but then coming in here and spouting off about TMM. Look at the softclaims we have so far. If Murmurtwin is pretending not to be seeing it, who else isn't reacting? Just look who gets nightkilled and then look back at the posting. In light of the flip. TMMadman posted:Uhhh, are you talking about me or someone else in this post? I want Asiina and Podima to weigh in here because the two of them have really got me thinking. I will come back to that in my next post, but for now I want them to report back with what they learned since then.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 03:47 |
|
I am super confused and really don't understand what you're getting at Lumpen. I'm trying my hardest to read what you're posting but it just makes no goddamn sense.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 03:54 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 05:24 |
|
BottleKnight posted:I am super confused and really don't understand what you're getting at Lumpen. I'm trying my hardest to read what you're posting but it just makes no goddamn sense. Happy St Patricks day!!!!
|
# ? Mar 18, 2016 03:55 |