|
Eh, why not. Join or die!
|
#
¿
Mar 30, 2016 15:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 21:07 |
|
|
COOL CORN posted:Patriots will take the event to help out our French brothers. They can declare open war at 15 total available units, right? Sure, why not; with the event they're more than halfway there, and both British and Indian act before us on the next card.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 15:11
|
|
|
Huh. Are we ready for battle in New York or do we want the Declaration of Independence event?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 04:37
|
|
|
I'm inclined to agree with Maryland-Delaware. No knock against New Hampshire but it's kinda surrounded right now, and that French symbol on top means that the French can take care of it next move, right?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 15:17
|
|
|
COOL CORN posted:I'd say getting more of a foothold in Mass is worthwhile, we already have a fort in NY. I thought our fort was already in Massachusetts?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 18:22
|
|
|
COOL CORN posted:Whoops! Brain fart. New York it is! Works for me.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 19:31
|
|
|
Do we get any more resources after this? If we want to go the full deal it's all 10 resources.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2016 18:12
|
|
|
COOL CORN posted:My vote is 2 in MD-DE, 2 in VA, and 1 in MA. Works for me.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2016 18:57
|
|
|
Yeah, the British are still in New York; let's not hand them their victory.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2016 04:33
|
|
|
Event for NYC and Boston, then!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2016 15:54
|
|
|
Caedar posted:The good event on the next card is really juicy, and the bad event on the next card is really really anti-juicy, so I think we should pass this round. They have a point. If we took this event, the British could undo almost all of it with the next event. I vote pass.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2016 06:40
|
|
|
Yes, Event.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
E: never mind, I think I get it. I guess that fort was lost anyway, so...
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2016 01:04
|
|
|
Why Quebec? Wouldn't that be readily skirmished off the board by the war party there?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2016 15:18
|
|
|
COOL CORN posted:I say Virginia, New Hampshire, Mass, Mass I like this. What are you going to do about THAT, Gage?!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2016 21:26
|
|
|
Militia everywhere, ready to skirmish! Sure, let's do it.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2016 02:19
|
|
|
Well...that's an awkward event to come up. Hey, France, can you pull together enough for a BRILLIANT STROKE next move?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2016 03:45
|
|
|
COOL CORN posted:Boy that next event would be nice... Hm... But the Indians could easily block us. Yeah, plus there's a giant doomstack in Massachusetts that could be reversed a bit with the event. I have no idea what to do. EDIT: Wait, component limit?! We only have 4 militia left?!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2016 21:32
|
|
|
Boston, NYC, or Mass? And if we do Mass, do we remove all Tories for 4 militia or just 2 Tories?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2016 21:24
|
|
|
Play event on Massachusetts, right? Alright, then we can win a straight fight!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2016 19:35
|
|
|
Event works for me, as well! Let's blockade Philly with the new FNI!
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2016 05:48
|
|
|
I vote yes on keeping the militia. Any other opinions?
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2016 16:51
|
|
|
I have no idea! Mass, New York x2, and Maryland-Delaware x2?
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2016 03:07
|
|
|
Oh, I see. Mass, Conn x2, Penn x2, then?
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2016 15:55
|
|
|
I don't know about Washington, but for the militia I say remove the one in New Hampshire (now firmly in French hands) and the active one in Massachusetts.
|
|
#
¿
May 16, 2016 04:57
|
|
|
Proposal: Rally in Pennsylvania and Maryland-Delaware, Persuasion Massachusetts and Connecticut-Rhode Island?
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
I like this game, although considering this is my first COIN game ever, if I'm running the patriots myself, we'll lose  .
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 21:07 |
|
|
You'd have to walk me through setting up VASSAL and the game and the PBEM structure, but I wouldn't mind this.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2016 15:44
|
|