|
I'll put my name in for lurker team.
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2016 04:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 16:00 |
|
|
Can confirm Hal is scum. He told me in the scumdoc.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 2, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
Ffs it was the weekend. Calling it a lurk because of the weekend is pretty scummy.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2016 22:25
|
|
|
Its monday morning. I gotta do some transit then I'll be at a computer to play and post.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
Is Jimson a Markov chain generator?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 01:43
|
|
|
Jimson and JakeP were looking a little too hard to make something from nothing earlier. Basically overanalysing. Jakep and Kashuno going for a lurker lynch is also very suspect.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
i can't decide who of the three are worse. I feel like Kashuno's just going along with whatever. Feels like scum just latching onto anything that seems easy. JakeP was trying too hard earlier, and then just going for a lurker lynch over spurious ideas of lurker. Weekends don't count. I'll have to cool off on this and relook though, because I am honestly pretty offended for first being called out for being abent over the weekend and then again for him dismissing me and not trusting me to actually play. But I've gone on too long for this at the moment. Jimson tried too hard then called JakeP out for trying too hard so there's a hypocrisy going on there. And he doesn't make any goddamn sense that I can't believe he's posting genuinely.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 02:55
|
|
|
My gut says ##vote Kashuno for blatant bandwagoning on poo poo votes.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 10:07
|
|
|
My gut says Kashuno > Jimson > JakeP, despite me having more points to write up about JakeP.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 22:39
|
|
|
Explain how. Worst thing I could gather was the turbo stuff and his choice to vote 50, but I'd thihnk he'd have just gone with Hal or Jim rather than following Kashuno's vote. Unless you push for a "absolutely not following the thread aand didn't have a general idea of the count" kind of thing.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
Let me try again. Why are you voting Bowmore? I think a scum Bowmore would have voted Jim or Hal during the early turbo joke thing, rather than voting for 50 with a serious but weak reason.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 23:01
|
|
|
JakeP posted:I could see a scum bowmore doing literally nothing except filler posts and excuses, and then maybe pop in with a late vote on whoever the vote leader is at the end of the day (if at all) Maybe I just don't see Scum Bowmore blatantly following Kashuno's vote (Kashuno is scum, surely).
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
I don't see how it's a light defense. It's a regular defense.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
I don't see scum pushing for a turbo choosing a third way target. I also don't see scum being so in sync, and I can't get past my gut call on Kashuno.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
Bowmore turning on me just convinces me more he's town. Well at least I have successfully saved Bowmore.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 23:38
|
|
|
Sometime Monday night is the only info.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
I'd say we have until Opop shows up. Jake what do you think of Kashuno?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
Same goes for Hal/Bowmore/anyone else who's here. Kashuno bandwagoned on Jake's bad lurker vote. Bad because it was the weekend. Worse because they both somehow "just plum forgot" that deadline wasn't that day. Jake is more forgivable, but just blindly jumping on it reeks.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
Vote count: Kashuno: (3) Amoeba, JakeP, Jimson Jimson: (2) Hal Incandenza, 50 Pounds of Bread Amoeba: (1) Bowmore Note voting: Kashuno Deadline is in ??? minutes.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
Jake at least thought you were scum early in D1, it's not like this is his only reason.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 00:30
|
|
|
It's like 4 hours now.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
I think Kashuno just retreated after him trying to call out your vote got questioned. He didn't even try to discuss it further, nor did he bring up Jimsons vote which is worse.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 03:35
|
|
|
It's okay, I got your vote count. 1 for Martin. 2 for Martin.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 03:58
|
|
|
Vote count: Kashuno: (4) Amoeba, JakeP, Jimson, Hal Incandenza Jimson: (1) 50 Pounds of Bread Amoeba: (1) Bowmore Note voting: Kashuno 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
I have a very hard time determining the difference between Jim's real votes and joke votes.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
If he defended them D1, then it must have been in the posts I couldn't parse. I don't remember him calling Kashuno scum, or agreeing with cases, except for the time he was suggesting a "Jimson Kashuno scum team" was more logical. His vote on Kash was literally "Any time to vote Kash". And he's been trying to vote Hal since before the game started. This isn't a scum call out. No one is that ballsy to try and convince others that the best scum team is them and their scum buddy. It was basically a statement about how Jim plays.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
But going down that same path, determining Hal's real posts and joke posts is just as hard because I can't seem to find the part where he starts playing.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
Bowmore's been skirting the edge, but at least has put in something that constitutes having an opinion. JakeP - stuff I didn't like about him D1 is invalid now.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
Hal > Bowmore > Jim > JakeP.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
I've never played a game this small before. It's kind of nice and manageable.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
Easy to manage a game no ones posting much in too.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 03:51
|
|
|
Yeah, basically.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 23:42
|
|
|
Well if you're a vet you're a different kind of mammal to the rest of us.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 23:50
|
|
|
Sorry Jake, you're an Eggman Vet.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
Then it can only be ##vote bowmore
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
Jake, you were my most trusted player before the claim and I don't have much reason to not trust you.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 03:59
|
|
|
Jim, can you point to something more than that which makes you think he's scum? I don't really see how he can be scum just because it's possible to rationalise his claim as a scum gambit.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
I don't see how it can be anything other than Jake is the doc and protected Jim who is just a crazy town guy and scum bowmore has been barely contributing.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Good on you Jim for trying to make discussion, though.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 16:00 |
|
|
Oh Jim.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 04:24
|
|