|
Sure, dibs on the shrubbery though.
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 16, 2024 10:12 |
|
|
Infinitum posted:Also good luck counting 23 votes while votefinder is still broken. Lol if you think 23 people will be active enough to vote consistently.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 03:09
|
|
|
Flying Leatherman posted:It's foolproof. 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 03:13
|
|
|
Well good morning everyone how are we this-- Here's my take on this back and forth: KK is behaving exactly the way he always does and I would be far more willing to vote for anyone that was throwing their vote on that bandwagon than either of them.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
gannyGrabber posted:Nah, I'm VT and am dennis the peasant, a character I lack the education to play. ;( Tremendous Taste posted:For whatever it's worth, I'm one of robin's minstrels. I'd assumed all vt would be the same. Perhaps that would be too easy a back door We have two conflicting VT claims here, and at least a few people who have indicated their roles are also singing-related.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 17:22
|
|
|
Shadow0 posted:We have absolutely no idea who is what, and to be honest, this has been the least exciting thread we have ever read on SA; zero flavor at all, just stupid, stupid, stupid yelling. So that makes the list of lazy Kash votes: Infinitum TheDonPeters Azuth Shadow0 Most of which are new players, which makes me hesitant to kill them D1 since that same protection saved my rear end the first game when I was VT.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 17:26
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:That's what I meant by good will. If you want to be done with the angry ranting, KK is the better vote. Not because of anything he's done to make him scum, but because once Kashuno is dead he will find a new target.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 17:29
|
|
|
That does seem pretty clear cut, and if he's lying we can lynch Muse D2 unless he's a jester 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 17:49
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:Also a d1 chain lynch post? I would've added this to my case too. You did catch the part where Muse said he got a PR result that said TT was scum right? Its pretty clear cut, if we lynch TT and he isn't scum, then Muse must have lied and is either scum or actively bad for town.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:I don't see how that means 100% scum either. He went into it. How does he draw that conclusion from what he went into it? You're being obtuse, but for what its worth I at least believe you are being sincere (and you brought some good points). Unfortunately, no one is going to be willing to vote for a possible scum when between YPM and TT we have confirmed scum. The actual details of how YPM came to the conclusion are somewhat irrelevant (provided he definitely got a scum result and isn't misinterpreting his results). It is a dumb gambit for a scum to make on D1, as it definitely outs them on D2 at the absolute latest for only one mislynch. Later in the game? Sure, when a mislynch puts us at lylo or worse.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 18:10
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:... Swallows aren't part of the round table either 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 18:13
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:It said the three coconuts I set up in an isosceles triangle buckled under the pressure, leading you to conclude TT is not a friend of the sciences Wait, what
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 18:34
|
|
|
If what I'm doing is buddying up, then you must be buddying up to rascyc too. Oh and KB agreed with me earlier so he must be buddying up to me too, he must be scum. The logic that a PR claiming to have found scum means either A) they are in fact a PR who found scum and we should lynch the person they found or B) they are lying scum and will be revealed as such when their target flips. Numerous people have shown how scenario B makes zero sense this early in the game. There is a secret third scenario, where the PR is town who is either lying (which is very stupid) or does not fully understand their results. Either way you're argument is terrible and I am starting to think you're scum. Actually that's a lie, you posted about wanting in to the mason doc earlier then vanished during the entire heated discussion of this morning which is not like you, and now you're making bad arguments against me.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 19:42
|
|
|
And just to end this red herring early, I am the African swallow and no, I don't know what my unladen flight speed or how it compares to friend Kashuno.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
Podima posted:For my buddying up bit, I was focusing on the language you used - "you're being obtuse but I think you're being sincere" comes off as wishy-washy, and scum want to make as many friends as possible and fly under the radar, so it's worth calling out where I see it. So you're just being pedantic so you can say something for the sake of looking like you're saying something then. Anyone with a brain can tell that C does not mean we should lynch YPM immediately, at the time however I was still entertaining the possibility of scenario B.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 20:03
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:That sure was 500 pages. I assume this is your one meaningful post for the day?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 21:19
|
|
|
I'm not going to vote for any new players D1, making lazy/excited votes with little justification is a null tell for them. Unless we expect to magically be scum masterminds trying to get quick lynches and not just drunk with the power of the vote.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
Somebody remake an argument for why we are voting YPM I don't want to struggle to make sense of the last few pages
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
Ok [b]##vote YPM[\b]
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
Oh no I messed up the formatting whatever will I do
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
By my count that is -4 (my vote is not real), I'm not gonna be party to a turbo EVEN IF IT COSTS ME MY LIFE. Gibbis will not take my dignity!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 01:24
|
|
|
-3!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 01:31
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:This is all very dumb and this is why we don't like gbs I'm pretty sure people have been turboed for less reason by "real" mafia players
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 01:37
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:Yeah but we are more attractive than you fatties I'm not gibbis, you filthy slanderer 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
Jimson posted:There are only 2 real reasons you refuse to claim If all the VTs claim all it does is narrow the field of good targets for scum and/or the doc.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 01:47
|
|
|
I'm fact that post seems a lot like role fishing, and therefore scummy.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 01:48
|
|
|
Jimson posted:Problem is, as VT I have no reason to role fish. I only want to avoid voting out a key player who is at -3. Especially when everyone is gnashing at the bit for his succulent flesh. Mhmmmmmmmmmmm
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 01:50
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:Your Personal Muse's writing all votes against him off as "ugh gibbis" is scummy as gently caress. It is literally "gibbis", I don't know how you can draw any other conclusions. I'm happy to hear any and all actual cases against YPM but until then I'm not voting. This is a bandwagon, nothing more.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 02:02
|
|
|
Flying Leatherman posted:MEDS CURE SCHIZOS replaces Doctor Dogballs. RIP Dr. Dogballs he was too beautiful for this forum
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2016 17:28
|
|
|
I've been hoping someone would provide a decent case for this vote train but I guess all we're getting is that YPM is a "bad poster" by some arbitrary rules of posting. I'm re-reading both him and Infinitum now in some kind of desperate attempt to understand but so far I have nothing. Someone please enlighten me.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 02:17
|
|
|
This was posted earlier in the thread but is very relevant now:
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
I will say that coming from a perspective of not discounting everything YPM says makes Infinitum look kinda bad, starting with the point where he starts harping on YPM for seemingly no reason:Infinitum posted:Claim then. First post mentioning YPM after the wagon got rolling. I don't see any real cases against YPM so the CLAIM NOW OR DIE thing doesn't make a lot of sense. It won't stop a gibbis train, thats for sure. Infinitum posted:YPMs gambit basically boils down to rolefishing and I don't like it This post makes no sense. How is the gambit rolefishing? There's only player it could potentially target: TT. So at best, the gambit gets TT's role out IF enough votes start piling on. Multiple people myself included have already called YPM's thing a dumb move from a scum perspective, so why is it suddenly rolefishing? There were a few people role claiming at this point but it was mostly because of the mason stuff that was happening, not the gambit. Apparently its some kind of mastermind play where mentioning one flavor makes everyone else suddenly feel the need to share their flavor. I guess I need to up my game.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
Aaaaaaand here we go again I guess, I'll see you guys in five pages.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 02:39
|
|
|
RIP CPig he was too good for this
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 02:43
|
|
|
Does this reduce the lynch threshold and therefore mean YPM is dead?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2016 02:44
|
|
|
Same, either something complicated happened last night that I'd rather not speculate about, or we are in for a very long game.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2016 01:04
|
|
|
The YPM murder train basically boiled down to a bunch of new players, and Infinitum, Tommunist, and SSV. I don't think its possible for there NOT to be scum somewhere in that list, and I definitely am not ruling any of the new player group out either.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
I am currently trying to read those three, but as far as I can tell Tommunist is just doing his usual poo poo posting while SSV is making an effort to look like he's putting in effort, and that's about it. Infinitum is the only one with actual content of the "experienced" easy votes against YPM.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
gannyGrabber posted:Perhaps it's 1 night kill and the rest are day actions + observation abilities..? Which makes this a very scary game to be in
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2016 01:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 16, 2024 10:12 |
|
|
Well, I was right about one thing at least
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2016 01:16
|
|