|
Count me in!
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2016 02:42 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2024 00:12 |
|
Flying Leatherman posted:Can I get an email address for role PM delivery? (Edited to remove email) Thanks! tpink fucked around with this message at 03:31 on Apr 5, 2016 |
# ¿ Apr 5, 2016 03:18 |
|
Flying Leatherman posted:perfect, thanks! Go ahead and edit that out if you want, I have saved it! Done, thanks again and look forward to the game!
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2016 03:32 |
|
Infinitum posted:Editing posts Oh dear . This is not off to a good start!
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2016 03:42 |
|
Tommunist posted:Things for new people to remember: Kashuno is the devil and will lead you astray with his melodic tones. *Nods wisely, jots notes furiously.*
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2016 04:06 |
|
Oh good, 10 pages of new content! *wades through pages and pages of boring-rear end Kash/KK bitchfest *
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2016 19:18 |
|
GulagDolls posted:anyone got a case i can jump on and be like "yeaaaah I agree with what this person is saying! they've got it goin on!" Yeah, I've been reading this and waiting for a bandwagon to jump on also, but so far, nothing really jumps out as plausible. We'll have more info after day 1!
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2016 01:30 |
|
Not voting for YPM based on what I've seen so far. Bandwagons are fun and all but this one seems to be particularly unsupported.
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2016 20:42 |
|
Rascyc posted:I don't think it's Infinitum either anymore. I trust YPM's read there and honestly I don't think a scum who just watches his scum mate get blasted makes the post "why do town have two day vigs" This is kinda making sense to me too.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 04:04 |
|
I'm a mafia newbie so I've mostly been hanging back and reading others' posts to try and get a read on people! Day 1 was basically a nonsense wash as far as I'm concerned, and I am still not sure I understand if the GBS crew is just bandwagoning for no reason or if there's something else going on.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 19:35 |
|
Also, someone posting a million things makes it more difficult for others to go back and piece their posting history together, so I personally would not be inclined to consider that a great thing - though with the obvious caveat that if someone is not posting at all, it's also really tough to get a read on them. So, umm, there should be some happy medium I guess?
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 19:38 |
|
Kashuno posted:so here's how I play; yeah each day is pretty much poo poo alone. However, if someone on any random day says something suspicious, I go back and read their content to see what else they've that said has bothered me. Has anyone been on your radar? The "lynch al lurkers" crew - I see the obvious reasoning for this (kill people who are not even playing the game), but it also makes for a very easy cover to lynch someone (because it's a plausible excuse for a vote). Not enough for me to actually vote for anyone in particular but still.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 19:48 |
|
Kashuno posted:The think about lynching all lurkers is that it is easier to justify lynching a lurker now, rather than if we get to the endgame and we have lurkers around when we cannot afford to mislynch Agree! As I said, there's a perfectly plausible explanation for those votes now, but doesn't that also provide a great cover for basically that same reason?
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 19:53 |
|
GulagDolls posted:lurking is not a valuable metric this game when a significant number of posters are high volume+low content (saying a lot and nothing.) in essence, there is too many people who are lurking, as in, not engaging, for it 2 matter Yeah, I think this is also sort of what I was getting at. Posting 200+ posts when 90% of them are meaningless doesn't really move the needle much more than lurking.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 19:54 |
|
Azuth0667 posted:The solution to your conundrum is to post more then you won't be classified as a lurker. Yeah, if I'm going to be lynched in my very first Mafia game I'd at least rather not be lynched for not posting enough.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 20:09 |
|
Friction.123 posted:Why are we still killing the don peters his recent posts have been far more helpful than half of you bandwagoners. This guy gets it.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 21:36 |
|
Azuth0667 posted:Until then lynch the lurkers is the plan. At what point in the game do we switch from lynching lurkers to lynching scum?
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 21:48 |
|
Also, seriously, do people not remember that ridiculous 15 pages or whatever on day one that was all noise and no content? gently caress post counts.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 21:50 |
|
Rarity posted:Of the people in this game I feel he's made more contribution than Meds, tpink, Gulag, WNM and Goku. Yeah, as I said I've been reading more than posting on the early side because (in large part because I am a total Mafia newbie) the posts from day 1 have given me no insight to contribute and I tried not to post just to make noise (though I am sure I did that too).
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 21:58 |
|
Also, just curious - obviously games vary but ballpark number, how many pages does an average Mafia game run?
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 22:08 |
|
Rarity posted:Yeah, I'm not buying Don as scum. He seems earnestly helpful in the early going with KK's puzzle, he breadcrumbs his flavour and I think he's too new to do that with a fakeclaim and his thoughts look like those of someone who doesn't really understand what's happening and is trying to make sense of it. I don't know what I am doing clearly but I also don't get why anyone would think he's scum. Of course this also might just be my "there but for the grace of God" thinking.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 22:15 |
|
Friction.123 posted:This is exactly what I'm saying, I have nothing against lynching lurkers, but Azuth has been single-minded in his pursuit of whatever target he picks (YPM, then Don) even when evidence begins to pile up that said target is not a good lynch. Every post he makes is focused on this, to the point where it strikes me as trying to keep the conversation focused entirely on said target. Right. It's one thing to say let's lynch poster X when that poster is just lurking. But it's another to keep going even when Poster X comes back and starts posting content and generally seems like maybe they shouldn't be the bandwagon target. (And this is not necessarily directed just at Azuth - think that might cover other people too, at least earlier on.)
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 22:54 |
|
Azuth0667 posted:What's wrong with standing by my vote unless there is some compelling evidence/reason? If the only original reason for the vote was that the lurker wasn't posting enough, and then they come back and post a bunch, isn't that a good reason to unvote?
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 22:55 |
|
*Now* Azuth stops posting?
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 23:20 |
|
Shadow0 posted:I don't think pushing for unpopular bandwagons is something scum would do, but it is what Azuth is doing. Why do you think it's an unpopular bandwagon? It's still got a bunch of votes for it and only a handful of people saying anything against it.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 23:28 |
|
GulagDolls posted:it sounds like pmachine could be bad. Why?
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 01:01 |
|
GulagDolls posted:they just freaking said Oops, somehow missed that, sorry.
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 01:17 |
|
Infinitum posted:Last night I was reading the thread and I wasn't getting a real good vibe off of the way Propaganda Machine was posting. PM, so are you going to respond to that question from Rascyc from a while ago about why you were suspicious about Infinitum like you said you would? Because Infinitum's post is kind of convincing...
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 16:11 |
|
Isn't this all pretty much a rehash of your earlier case against Infi? That's pretty weak. Anything else? Because otherwise I'm leaning toward a vote.
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 17:10 |
|
Propaganda Machine posted:I'll help you guys get this over with, then. I'm rusty and it hasn't been fun outside of jokephase. Hopefully any of this helps you nail scum before scum nails you. Good luck, town. Well now I don't know what to think.
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 17:41 |
|
Infinitum posted:Well there is one way to verify.. The Scum team roleblocker is dead, so someone could investigate you tonight and not be blocked to determine alignment. I mean if PM is not just saying "whatever lynch me," he's saying "whatever lynch me because my heart is not really in this anyway and I don't want to play." The former sounds like something he might say if he were trying to stop the bandwagon; the latter is more plausible and a reasonable explanation for a self-lynch vote. Ugh I JUST DON'T KNOW.
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 19:39 |
|
Propaganda Machine posted:Right, good shot. And now he unvoted himself, adding to my confusion. REVEAL YOURSELF PM.
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 19:41 |
|
Rascyc posted:##vote azuth I'm going to go back to this and just stand with Kash on this one. Is there a way to see the latest vote counts, or is this something that just regularly gets updated by the mod?
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 20:18 |
|
Screw it. ##vote propaganda machine
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 23:01 |
|
Well poo poo. And I wouldn't have voted for PM until he did the dumb self-vote which made it seem suspicious. Sorry PM
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2016 02:08 |
|
Tommunist posted:hello i have no idea whats going on I just looked at your posts, and bad news, I think you're next on the lurker / low content poasters bandwagon.
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2016 02:30 |
|
gannyGrabber posted:Haha we're pretty hosed now Time to form a murder-suicide pact?
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2016 06:18 |
|
Rarity posted:So these are the votes that rolled in after PMach claimed. My reason for voting an unconstested doctor claim was because it came on the heels of the suspicious self-lynch vote and because, as someone had pointed out, this claim only came out after PM had a bunch of lynch votes and it just sounded like PM was saying whatever to avoid a lynch after #unvoting himself.
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2016 15:53 |
|
King Burgundy posted:I like your SSV case. Would vote. (posting from page 52): I ultimately voted for PM after reading SSV suggesting that PM was faking the doctor claim, and coupled with the rest of your SSV case, I'm sort of seeing it.
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2016 21:12 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2024 00:12 |
|
Kashuno posted:I am just not keeping up with the game, clearly displayed by the fact that I am not remembering/reading the thread properly. I am a liability to town that scum will have an easy time pushing (see the 3 votes on me earlier with literally no content that no one batted an eye at) Didn't we just do this with PM?
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2016 21:18 |