|
snakeandbake posted:9/11ary Clinton https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLkFtfyWK3Q
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 22:57 |
|
|
rscott posted:My prediction is that Sanders loses by less than 5 points I predict Hillary being up by seven or eight points.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:28
|
|
|
I think the upper bound for Hillary is 60-40, but I predict 57-43.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:34
|
|
|
This is the thread for smashmouth you're an all star remixes right, htere's only one good one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAsPeY8BsQU
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:34
|
|
|
Clinton is gonna win NY by 6-10 points, imho
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
this_is_hard posted:Clinton is gonna win NY by 6-10 points, imho Why do you think that?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
this_is_hard posted:Clinton is gonna win NY by 6-10 points, imho yeah prob
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
Everyone will finally get the neocon candidate they sorely missed from the GOP side
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
I've got a friend in the military who seriously needed to die anyway.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
B B posted:Why do you think that? http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ny/new_york_democratic_presidential_primary-4221.html The polls show Clinton having an aggregate lead of 11.7 points over the last week with even the most favorable poll having Clinton still up by 6. Sanders has typically done about 1-2 points higher than he polls if you don't include Michigan (because  if you do) so a 6-10 point victory for Clinton is about right.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
TyrantWD posted:https://twitter.com/JordanChariton/status/722452495734321152 These fuckers are going to get me stuck in New York just like they bogged me down in Missouri, aren't they?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:51
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:These fuckers are going to get me stuck in New York just like they bogged me down in Missouri, aren't they? TYT is funded by predictit dollars and they need to sell their shares
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:52
|
|
|
New York's polls seem to be giving Clinton a double-digit lead. Just like the ones in Michigan were. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that they tie of she leads by 5%. This is going straight to the convention.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:55
|
|
|
B B posted:Why do you think that? polling data, experience in politics, a general recognition of reality
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:56
|
|
|
Mad Doctor Cthulhu posted:New York's polls seem to be giving Clinton a double-digit lead. Just like the ones in Michigan were. going to be lazy here and just say somewhere around Clinton +11.7 which is exactly what the poll aggregates currently say
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:57
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:These fuckers are going to get me stuck in New York just like they bogged me down in Missouri, aren't they? Hope and pray Hillary wins by 20% so the provisionals don't even need to be counted, lol.  Ride or die.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
Mad Doctor Cthulhu posted:New York's polls seem to be giving Clinton a double-digit lead. Just like the ones in Michigan were. Michigan was horribly polled and had a historically bad model though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
Remember Michigan! We just need a 1 in 1000 polling error in our candidates favor the rest of the way in every state! We got this!! I just emptied my bank account to Bernie!! MATCH ME!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
Where did the post about how the guy filing the lawsuit is a fraud? I swear it was in this thread but I can't find it. Doesn't look like it's in the general dem primary thread either.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:00
|
|
|
this_is_hard posted:polling data, experience in politics, a general recognition of reality Ah, okay. Cool. Thanks for clarifying. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:01
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Michigan was horribly polled and had a historically bad model though. Most of the polls I've read the methods for seem to be modeling turnout based on the 2004 and 2008 which I think are underestimating turnout for 18-29s a bit
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:03
|
|
|
rscott posted:Most of the polls I've read the methods for seem to be modeling turnout based on the 2004 and 2008 which I think are underestimating turnout for 18-29s a bit Pretty hard to underestimate millennial turnout. They can't even put the bong down long enough to register properly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
looks like the dem thread is pulling far ahead of the gop one.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:05
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Yeah, they can't call CA in the general until our polls close even though everyone knows it's going to the dems. I really like this approach since electoral results reporting while the polls are still open could, in theory, have an effect on how people vote. Or they could stay home if the news projected the winner and then the down ticket suffers. Plus, it's not like they've ever called it wrong. E: phone posting typos because I'm a moron.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:10
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:looks like the dem thread is pulling far ahead of the gop one. It's because this forum's full of godless liberals.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:11
|
|
|
Bloody Queef posted:I really like this approach since electoral results reporting while the polls are still open could, in theory, have an effect on how people vote. Or they could stay home if the news projects the winner and the down ticket surfers.  It's also fun a poo poo to watch CA completely obliterate the EV vote lead that republicans typically get from the Midwest / Texas a few hours earlier once polls close here.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:13
|
|
|
Bloody Queef posted:I really like this approach since electoral results reporting while the polls are still open could, in theory, have an effect on how people vote. Or they could stay home if the news projected the winner and then the down ticket suffers. I think we could save a lot of money on elections if only people in swing states voted, though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:13
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:looks like the dem thread is pulling far ahead of the gop one. Because a bunch of us want the schadenfreude of people melting down on twitter, reddit, and here when Bernie loses. Nobody is going to meltdown at the results of the GOP primary in NY. That thread is low energy!
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:15
|
|
|
We should think of some new bernie thread titles for after
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:16
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Hope and pray Hillary wins by 20% so the provisionals don't even need to be counted, lol. With Trump getting serious and the GOP race getting boring, I hope we get some court cases that rage on for another six weeks. Chaos must reign!
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:17
|
|
|
Bernie 2016: Left in the dust
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:17
|
|
|
Toast. Bernt Bread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:18
|
|
|
Homeless Friend posted:We should think of some new bernie thread titles for after i haven't studied how to win yet
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:20
|
|
|
Predicting 55-45 Clinton.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:20
|
|
|
If anyone cares, I can confirm voter registration is fubar. We've voted here and are registered to our party for the last, oh, six years. Today my wife was told the only registration they have was in Yonkers and she wasn't on the list, had her fill a provisional. While we were there two more people came in and couldn't vote, the staff claimed the party was 'angry' any time they called up to ask questions. We have never lived in Yonkers and she's been 'on the list' for the last six years, we vote in every election including local... I pulled her up online and confirmed the site claims 'registered Dem in Yonkers'. We have never, ever lived in Yonkers or had any Yonkers address associated with us.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
OAquinas posted:It'll be interesting if Sanders keeps her from reaching the nomination via pledged delegates, though--which he can easily do as long as he avoids losing by more than 10% for the remainder of the elections (including tonight). At that point it comes down to superdelegates to put her over and that will undoubtedly make some people salty. The nomination number is based on total delegates. Expecting to reach it without superdelegates is silly. All she has to crush that storyline is win the majority of elected delegates. No I'm not excluding the reality that Sanders supporters will blindly repost poo poo on facebook to the contrary.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:33
|
|
|
Atoramos posted:If anyone cares, I can confirm voter registration is fubar. We've voted here and are registered to our party for the last, oh, six years. Today my wife was told the only registration they have was in Yonkers and she wasn't on the list, had her fill a provisional. While we were there two more people came in and couldn't vote, the staff claimed the party was 'angry' any time they called up to ask questions. We have never lived in Yonkers and she's been 'on the list' for the last six years, we vote in every election including local... The only thing i took away from that is how funny the word yonkers is. Yonkers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:35
|
|
|
Atoramos posted:If anyone cares, I can confirm voter registration is fubar. We've voted here and are registered to our party for the last, oh, six years. Today my wife was told the only registration they have was in Yonkers and she wasn't on the list, had her fill a provisional. While we were there two more people came in and couldn't vote, the staff claimed the party was 'angry' any time they called up to ask questions. We have never lived in Yonkers and she's been 'on the list' for the last six years, we vote in every election including local... Who was she planning to vote for?
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:35
|
|
|
Atoramos posted:If anyone cares, I can confirm voter registration is fubar. We've voted here and are registered to our party for the last, oh, six years. Today my wife was told the only registration they have was in Yonkers and she wasn't on the list, had her fill a provisional. While we were there two more people came in and couldn't vote, the staff claimed the party was 'angry' any time they called up to ask questions. We have never lived in Yonkers and she's been 'on the list' for the last six years, we vote in every election including local... Is Yonkers even a real place? Sounds made up.
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 22:57 |
|
|
Bernice Anders posted:I deal in reality, not faith. It's why I'm not a Bernie voter. There is no such thing as reality outside cogito ergo sum, faith is all there is You're posting back and forth with figments of your imagination, life is but a dream, amigo
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2016 18:35
|
|